Complaint dated 13 April 2014 to the CJI, the Supreme Court Secretary General and others from General Electric whistleblower Seema Sapra - Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 - in the matter of Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company and Ors.

Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone

-----Original Message-----
From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 22:32:49
To: <director@aiims.ac.in>; <lggc.delhi@nic.in>; rg.dhc@nic.in<rg.dhc@nic.in>; Bhim Sain Bassi<cp.bsbassi@nic.in>; <joe.kaeser@siemens.com>; <dch@nic.in>; <secypc@nic.in>; splcp-admin-dl@nic.in<splcp-admin-dl@nic.in>; splcp-intandops-dl@nic.in<splcp-intandops-dl@nic.in>; splcp-antiriotcell-dl@nic.in<splcp-antiriotcell-dl@nic.in>; splcp-security-dl@nic.in<splcp-security-dl@nic.in>; splcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in<splcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in>; splcp-crime-dl@nic.in<splcp-crime-dl@nic.in>; splcp-armed-dl@nic.in<splcp-armed-dl@nic.in>; splcp-operation-dl@nic.in<splcp-operation-dl@nic.in>; splcp-traffic-dl@nic.in<splcp-traffic-dl@nic.in>; splcp-pl-dl@nic.in<splcp-pl-dl@nic.in>; <splcp-trg-dl@nic.in>; splcp-splcell-dl@nic.in<splcp-splcell-dl@nic.in>; <jtcp-cr-dl@nic.in>; jtcp-nr-dl@nic.in<jtcp-nr-dl@nic.in>; <jtcp-ser-dl@nic.in>; <jtcp-swr-dl@nic.in>; splcp-pandi-dl@nic.in<splcp-pandi-dl@nic.in>; <jtcp-training-dl@nic.in>; jtcp-phq-dl@nic.in<jtcp-phq-dl@nic.in>; <jtcp-ga-dl@nic.in>; jtcpt_dtp@nic.in<jtcpt_dtp@nic.in>; jtcp-crime-dl@nic.in<jtcp-crime-dl@nic.in>; <jtcp-splcell-dl@nic.in>; <jtcp-sec-dl@nic.in>; jcpsec@rb.nic.in<jcpsec@rb.nic.in>; addlcp-eow-dl@nic.in<addlcp-eow-dl@nic.in>; <jtcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in>; <jtcp-sb-dl@nic.in>; <addlcp-crime-dl@nic.in>; addlcpt-dtp@nic.in<addlcpt-dtp@nic.in>; addlcp-caw-dl@nic.in<addlcp-caw-dl@nic.in>; addlcp-security-dl@nic.in<addlcp-security-dl@nic.in>; <addlcp-ptc-dl@nic.in>; addlcp-lic-dl@nic.in<addlcp-lic-dl@nic.in>; <dcp-west-dl@nic.in>; <addlcp-se-dl@nic.in>; dcp-southwest-dl@nic.in<dcp-southwest-dl@nic.in>; dcp-crime-dl@nic.in<dcp-crime-dl@nic.in>; <dcp-eow-dl@nic.in>; <dcp-splcell-dl@nic.in>; <dcp-east-dl@nic.in>; <dcp-northeast-dl@nic.in>; dcp-central-dl@nic.in<dcp-central-dl@nic.in>; <dcp-north-dl@nic.in>; <dcp-northwest-dl@nic.in>; dcp-south-dl@nic.in<dcp-south-dl@nic.in>; <dcp-outer-dl@nic.in>; dcp-newdelhi-dl@nic.in<dcp-newdelhi-dl@nic.in>; dcp-pcr-dl@nic.in<dcp-pcr-dl@nic.in>; dcp-southeast-dl@nic.in<dcp-southeast-dl@nic.in>; <dcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in>; <dcp-igiairport-dl@nic.in>; South Asia Initiative Harvard University<sainit@fas.harvard.edu>; sorina.tira@emdiesels.com<sorina.tira@emdiesels.com>; joanne.brozovich@emdiesels.com<joanne.brozovich@emdiesels.com>; customs@emdiesels.com<customs@emdiesels.com>; Mahesh Batra<itcphq-dl@nic.in>; janpathten@yahoo.com<janpathten@yahoo.com>; sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in<sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in>; sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in<sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in>; addl-dcp2-nd-dl@nic.in<addl-dcp2-nd-dl@nic.in>; acp-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in<acp-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in>; sho-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in<sho-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in>; office@rahulgandhi.in<office@rahulgandhi.in>; Arvind Nigam<nigamak@gmail.com>; sho-hndin-dl@nic.in<sho-hndin-dl@nic.in>; enquiries@in.g4s.com<enquiries@in.g4s.com>; arjun.wallia@securitas-india.com<arjun.wallia@securitas-india.com>; kris.van.den.briel@securitas.in<kris.van.den.briel@securitas.in>; contact.us@securitas-india.com<contact.us@securitas-india.com>; contact@securitasinc.com<contact@securitasinc.com>; dan.ryan@g4s.com<dan.ryan@g4s.com>; grahame.gibson@g4s.com<grahame.gibson@g4s.com>; nick.buckles@g4s.com<nick.buckles@g4s.com>; Madder, Emily<emily.madder@siemens.com>; banmali.agrawala@ge.com<banmali.agrawala@ge.com>; peter.loescher@siemens.com<peter.loescher@siemens.com>; cmukund@mukundcherukuri.com<cmukund@mukundcherukuri.com>; duadel@duaassociates.com<duadel@duaassociates.com>; ranji@duaassociates.com<ranji@duaassociates.com>; rajshekhar rao<rao.rajshekhar@gmail.com>; mail@aglaw.in<mail@aglaw.in>; vikram@duaassociates.com<vikram@duaassociates.com>; neeraj@duaassociates.com<neeraj@duaassociates.com>; sec-jus@gov.in<sec-jus@gov.in>; pk.malhotra@nic.in<pk.malhotra@nic.in>; ramakrishnan.r@nic.in<ramakrishnan.r@nic.in>; oo.prlsecypmo@gov.in<oo.prlsecypmo@gov.in>; pulok@gov.in<pulok@gov.in>; jmg.vc@nic.in<jmg.vc@nic.in>; r.sri_kumar@nic.in<r.sri_kumar@nic.in>; cvc@nic.in<cvc@nic.in>; hm@nic.in<hm@nic.in>; hshso@nic.in<hshso@nic.in>; complaintcell-ncw@nic.in<ncw@nic.in>; complaintcell-ncw@nic.in<complaintcell-ncw@nic.in>; sgnhrc@nic.in<sgnhrc@nic.in>; dg-nhrc@nic.in<dg-nhrc@nic.in>; newhaven@ic.fbi.gov<newhaven@ic.fbi.gov>; ny1@ic.fbi.gov<ny1@ic.fbi.gov>; usanys.wpcomp@usdoj.gov<usanys.wpcomp@usdoj.gov>; nalin.jain@ge.com<nalin.jain@ge.com>; amit.kumar@ge.com<amit.kumar@ge.com>; pradeep.gupta@ge.com<pradeep.gupta@ge.com>; sriram.nagarajan@ge.com<sriram.nagarajan@ge.com>; Wiltschek Susanne EDA WSU<susanne.wiltschek@eda.admin.ch>; helpline@eda.admin.ch<helpline@eda.admin.ch>; _EDA-Vertretung-New-Delhi<ndh.vertretung@eda.admin.ch>; _EDA-VISA New-Delhi<ndh.visa@eda.admin.ch>; _EDA-Etat Civil New Delhi<ndh.etatcivil@eda.admin.ch>; vertretung@ndh.rep.admin.ch<vertretung@ndh.rep.admin.ch>; beatrice.latteier@eda.admin.ch<beatrice.latteier@eda.admin.ch>; emb@rusembassy.in<emb@rusembassy.in>; indconru indconru<indconru@gmail.com>; web.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk<web.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk>; conqry.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk<conqry.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk>; LegalisationEnquiries@fco.gov.uk<LegalisationEnquiries@fco.gov.uk>; delegation-india@eeas.europa.eu<delegation-india@eeas.europa.eu>; re-india.commerce@international.gc.ca<re-india.commerce@international.gc.ca>; info@new-delhi.diplo.de<info@new-delhi.diplo.de>; Ambassaden New Delhi<ambassaden.new-delhi@foreign.ministry.se>; delamb@um.dk<delamb@um.dk>; emb.newdelhi@mfa.no<emb.newdelhi@mfa.no>; chinaemb_in@mfa.gov.cn<chinaemb_in@mfa.gov.cn>; InfoDesk@ohchr.org<InfoDesk@ohchr.org>; Press-Info@ohchr.org<Press-Info@ohchr.org>; civilsociety@ohchr.org<civilsociety@ohchr.org>; nationalinstitutions@ohchr.org<nationalinstitutions@ohchr.org>; webmaster@ambafrance-in.org<webmaster@ambafrance-in.org>; info_visa_delhi@ambafrance-in.org<info_visa_delhi@ambafrance-in.org>; VA@ndh.rep.admin.ch<VA@ndh.rep.admin.ch>; indne@unhcr.org<indne@unhcr.org>; ambasciata.newdelhi@esteri.it<ambasciata.newdelhi@esteri.it>; chinaconsul_kkt@mfa.gov.cn<chinaconsul_kkt@mfa.gov.cn>; chinaconsul_mum_in@mfa.gov.cn<chinaconsul_mum_in@mfa.gov.cn>; webmaster@mfa.gov.cn<webmaster@mfa.gov.cn>; in@mofcom.gov.cn<in@mofcom.gov.cn>; advocatesapnachauhan@yahoo.com<advocatesapnachauhan@yahoo.com>; sapnachauhan.chauhan192@gmail.com<sapnachauhan.chauhan192@gmail.com>; dcbi@cbi.gov.in<dcbi@cbi.gov.in>; Manpreet Lamba<manpreet.lamba@azbpartners.com>; mr@rb.railnet.gov.in<mr@rb.railnet.gov.in>; msrk@rb.railnet.gov.in<msrk@rb.railnet.gov.in>; edpgmsrk@rb.railnet.gov.in<edpgmsrk@rb.railnet.gov.in>; msrb@rb.railnet.gov.in<msrb@rb.railnet.gov.in>; crb@rb.railnet.gov.in<crb@rb.railnet.gov.in>; srppscrb@rb.railnet.gov.in<srppscrb@rb.railnet.gov.in>; osdpri@rb.railnet.gov.in<osdpri@rb.railnet.gov.in>; dsconf@rb.railnet.gov.in<dsconf@rb.railnet.gov.in>; fc@rb.railnet.gov.in<fc@rb.railnet.gov.in>; ppsfc@rb.railnet.gov.in<ppsfc@rb.railnet.gov.in>; edfc@rb.railnet.gov.in<edfc@rb.railnet.gov.in>; ml@rb.railnet.gov.in<ml@rb.railnet.gov.in>; ppsml@rb.railnet.gov.in<ppsml@rb.railnet.gov.in>; psml@rb.railnet.gov.in<psml@rb.railnet.gov.in>; osdml@rb.railnet.gov.in<osdml@rb.railnet.gov.in>; me@rb.railnet.gov.in<me@rb.railnet.gov.in>; ppsme@rb.railnet.gov.in<ppsme@rb.railnet.gov.in>; osdme@rb.railnet.gov.in<osdme@rb.railnet.gov.in>; mm@rb.railnet.gov.in<mm@rb.railnet.gov.in>; ms@rb.railnet.gov.in<ms@rb.railnet.gov.in>; ppsms@rb.railnet.gov.in<ppsms@rb.railnet.gov.in>; dpc1@rb.railnet.gov.in<dpc1@rb.railnet.gov.in>; mt@rb.railnet.gov.in<mt@rb.railnet.gov.in>; srppsmt@rb.railnet.gov.in<srppsmt@rb.railnet.gov.in>; ppsmt@rb.railnet.gov.in<ppsmt@rb.railnet.gov.in>; dtcord@rb.railnet.gov.in<dtcord@rb.railnet.gov.in>; secyrb@rb.railnet.gov.in<secyrb@rb.railnet.gov.in>; pssecyrb@rb.railnet.gov.in<pssecyrb@rb.railnet.gov.in>; dgrhs@rb.railnet.gov.in<dgrhs@rb.railnet.gov.in>; ppsdgrhs@rb.railnet.gov.in<ppsdgrhs@rb.railnet.gov.in>; dgrpf@rb.railnet.gov.in<dgrpf@rb.railnet.gov.in>; srppsdgrpf@rb.railnet.gov.in<srppsdgrpf@rb.railnet.gov.in>; edcc@rb.railnet.gov.in<edcc@rb.railnet.gov.in>; aml@rb.railnet.gov.in<aml@rb.railnet.gov.in>; legaladv@rb.railnet.gov.in<legaladv@rb.railnet.gov.in>; amm@rb.railnet.gov.in<amm@rb.railnet.gov.in>; amplg@rb.railnet.gov.in<amplg@rb.railnet.gov.in>; r_s_chidambaram@cat.com<r_s_chidambaram@cat.com>; sunand.sharma@alstom.com<sunand.sharma@alstom.com>; hiren.vyas@alstom.com<hiren.vyas@alstom.com>; jojo.alexander@alstom.com<jojo.alexander@alstom.com>; patrick.ledermann@alstom.com<patrick.ledermann@alstom.com>; rathin.basu@alstom.com<rathin.basu@alstom.com>; Dimitrief, Alexander (GE, Corporate)<alexander.dimitrief@ge.com>; Eglash, Jeffrey C (GE, Corporate)<jeffrey.eglash@ge.com>; Nanju Ganpathy<nanju.ganpathy@azbpartners.com>; bradford.berenson@ge.com<bradford.berenson@ge.com>; brackett.denniston@ge.com<brackett.denniston@ge.com>; jeffrey.immelt@ge.com<jeffrey.immelt@ge.com>; john.flannery@ge.com<john.flannery@ge.com>; delhihighcourt@nic.in<delhihighcourt@nic.in>; pmosb@nic.in<pmosb@nic.in>; askdoj@usdoj.gov<askdoj@usdoj.gov>; CHAIRMANOFFICE@SEC.GOV<CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov>; help@sec.gov<help@sec.gov>; fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov<fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov>; radhakrishnan.k@ge.com<radhakrishnan.k@ge.com>; tejal.singh@ge.com<tejal.singh@ge.com>; Sonali Mathur<sonali.mathur@azbpartners.com>; <eric.holder@usdoj.gov>; preet.bharara@usdoj.gov<preet.bharara@usdoj.gov>; NDwebmail@state.gov<NDwebmail@state.gov>; Denise_L._Cote@nysd.uscourts.gov<Denise_L._Cote@nysd.uscourts.gov>; ruby_krajick@nysd.uscourts.gov<ruby_krajick@nysd.uscourts.gov>; Leonard_B._Sand@nysd.uscourts.gov<Leonard_B._Sand@nysd.uscourts.gov>; gloria_rojas@nysd.uscourts.gov<gloria_rojas@nysd.uscourts.gov>; william_donald@nysd.uscourts.gov<william_donald@nysd.uscourts.gov>; edward_friedland@nysd.uscourts.gov<edward_friedland@nysd.uscourts.gov>; richard_wilson@nysd.uscourts.gov<richard_wilson@nysd.uscourts.gov>; robert_rogers@nysd.uscourts.gov<robert_rogers@nysd.uscourts.gov>; kdonovan-maher@bermandevalerio.com<kdonovan-maher@bermandevalerio.com>; rcohen@lowey.com<rcohen@lowey.com>; ffetf@usdoj.gov<ffetf@usdoj.gov>; Harold_Baer@nysd.uscourts.gov<Harold_Baer@nysd.uscourts.gov>; Jed_S._Rakoff@nysd.uscourts.gov<Jed_S._Rakoff@nysd.uscourts.gov>; Cathy_Seibel@nysd.uscourts.gov<Cathy_Seibel@nysd.uscourts.gov>; Victor_Marrero@nysd.uscourts.gov<Victor_Marrero@nysd.uscourts.gov>; fja@federaljudgesassoc.org<fja@federaljudgesassoc.org>; supremecourt@nic.in<supremecourt@nic.in>; Loretta_A._Preska@nysd.uscourts.gov<Loretta_A._Preska@nysd.uscourts.gov>; Ronald J. Keating<RKeating@bermandevalerio.com>; <jtabacco@bermandevalerio.com>; <bhart@lowey.com>; <rharwood@hfesq.com>; Joseph Guglielmo<jguglielmo@scott-scott.com>; <drscott@scott-scott.com>; ombudsperson@corporate.ge.com<ombudsperson@corporate.ge.com>; <Directors@corporate.ge.com>; Siemens Ombudsman COM<mail@siemens-ombudsman.com>; <Sunder.Venkat@aero.bombardier.com>; <compliance.office@bombardier.com>; <nilesh.pattanayak@aero.bombardier.com>; <pierre.beaudoin@bombardier.com>; <djohnson@mccarthy.ca>; <douglas.oberhelman@caterpilllar.com>; <william.ainsworth@caterpillar.com>; <CATshareservices@cat.com>; <BusinessPractices@cat.com>; <patrick.kron@alstom.com>; <keith.carr@alstom.com>; <Jean-David.barnea@usdoj.gov>; <reed.brodsky@usdoj.gov>; <andrew.michaelson@usdoj.gov>; <ellen.davis@usdoj.gov>; <eric.glover@usdoj.gov>; <paul.murphy@usdoj.gov>; <sandra.glover@usdoj.gov>; <robert.spector@usdoj.gov>; <christopher.connolly@usdoj.gov>; <joseph.cordaro@usdoj.gov>; <david.jones6@usdoj.gov>; <daniel.filor@usdoj.gov>; <amy.barcelo@usdoj.gov>; <christopher.harwood@usdoj.gov>; <michael.byars@usdoj.gov>; <benjamin.torrance@usdoj.gov>; <sarah.normand@usdoj.gov>; <elizabeth.shapiro@usdoj.gov>; <alicia.simmons@usdoj.gov>; <joyce.vance@usdoj.gov>; <kenyen.brown@usdoj.gov>; <karen.loeffler@usdoj.gov>; <andre.birotte@usdoj.gov>; <melinda.haag@usdoj.gov>; <laura.duffy@usdoj.gov>; <john.walsh@usdoj.gov>; <david.weiss@usdoj.gov>; <ronald.machen@usdoj.gov>; <robert.o'neill@usdoj.gov>; <pamela.marsh@usdoj.gov>; <wifredo.ferrer@usdoj.gov>; <michael.moore@usdoj.gov>; sally yates<sally.yates@usdoj.gov>; <edward.tarver@usdoj.gov>; <alicia.limtiaco@usdoj.gov>; <florence.nakakuni@usdoj.gov>; <wendy.olson@usdoj.gov>; <james.lewis@usdoj.gov>; <patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov>; <stephen.wigginton@usdoj.gov>; <david.capp@usdoj.gov>; <joseph.hogsett@usdoj.gov>; <stephanie.rose@usdoj.gov>; <nick.klinefeldt@usdoj.gov>; <kerry.harvey@usdoj.gov>; <david.hale@usdoj.gov>; <stephanie.finley@usdoj.gov>; <rod.rosenstein@usdoj.gov>; <carmen.ortiz@usdoj.gov>; <barbara.mcquade@usdoj.gov>; <b.todd.jones@usdoj.gov>; <william.martin@usdoj.gov>; <richard.callahan@usdoj.gov>; <beth.phillips@usdoj.gov>; <michael.cotter@usdoj.gov>; <deborah.gilg@usdoj.gov>; <daniel.bogden@usdoj.gov>; <john.kacavas@usdoj.gov>; <paul.fishman@usdoj.gov>; <kenneth.gonzales@usdoj.gov>; <loretta.lynch@usdoj.gov>; <richard.hartunian@usdoj.gov>; <william.hochul@usdoj.gov>; <john.stone@usdoj.gov>; <anne.tompkins@usdoj.gov>; <tim.purdon@usdoj.gov>; <steve.dettelbach@usdoj.gov>; <carter.stewart@usdoj.gov>; <sandy.coats@usdoj.gov>; <zane.memeger@usdoj.gov>; <peter.smith@usdoj.gov>; <david.hickton@usdoj.gov>; <peter.neronha@usdoj.gov>; <bill.nettles@usdoj.gov>; <william.killian@usdoj.gov>; <jerry.martin@usdoj.gov>; <edward.stanton@usdoj.gov>; <jose.moreno@usdoj.gov>; <carlie.christensen@usdoj.gov>; <tristram.coffin@usdoj.gov>; <ronald.sharpe@usdoj.gov>; <neil.macbride@usdoj.gov>; <timothy.heaphy@usdoj.gov>; <bill.ihlenfeld@usdoj.gov>; <booth.goodwin@usdoj.gov>; <james.santelle@usdoj.gov>; <john.vaudreuil@usdoj.gov>; <christopher.crofts@usdoj.gov>; <bprao@bhel.in>; <opb@bhel.in>; <akhatua@bhel.in>; <csverma@bhel.in>; <vpandhi@bhel.in>; Atul Saraya<saraya@bhel.in>; <ajay.sinha@emdiesels.com>; Rajeeve Mehra<mehralaw@gmail.com>; <mehralaw@yahoo.co.in>; <lajita.rajesh@alstom.com>; <francois.carpentier@alstom.com>; <armin.bruck@siemens.com>; <sunil.mathur@siemens.com>; <benoit.martel@bombardier.com>; <luis.ramos@bombardier.com>; <harsh.dhingra@bombardier.com>; <glen.lehman@caterpillar.com>; <john.newman@caterpillar.com>; <peter.solmssen@siemens.com>; <roland.busch@siemens.com>; <michael.suess@siemens.com>; <klaus.helmrich@siemens.com>; <daniel.desjardins@bombardier.com>; <james.buda@caterpillar.com>; <adam.smith@emdiesels.com>; <glen.lehman@progressrail.com>; <duane.cantrell@progressrail.com>; <craig.johnson@caterpillar.com>; <alert.procedure@alstom.com>; Zia Mody (zia.mody@azbpartners.com)<zia.mody@azbpartners.com>; Warin, F. Joseph<fwarin@gibsondunn.com>; Chesley, John<JChesley@gibsondunn.com>; <pk65sharma@yahoo.co.in>; <confidential@sfo.gsi.gov.uk>; <public.enquiries@sfo.gsi.gov.uk>; ohhdl@dalailama.com<ohhdl@dalailama.com>; <stephen.vogt@ic.fbi.gov>; <luis.quesada@ic.fbi.gov>; <steven.kessler@ic.fbi.gov>; <henry.gittleman@ic.fbi.gov>; <renn.cannon@ic.fbi.gov>; <stephen.gaudin@ic.fbi.gov>; <eric.peterson@ic.fbi.gov>; <jeff.bedford@ic.fbi.gov>; <david.brooks@ic.fbi.gov>; <robert.clifford@ic.fbi.gov>; <mary.warren@ic.fbi.gov>; <bill.nicholson@ic.fbi.gov>; <frank.teixeira@ic.fbi.gov>; <richard.cavalieros@ic.fbi.gov>; <timothy.langan@ic.fbi.gov>; <sharon.kuo@ic.fbi.gov>; <kingman.wong@ic.fbi.gov>; <daniel.bodony@ic.fbi.gov>; <christopher.mcmurray@ic.fbi.gov>; <ralph.hope@ic.fbi.gov>; <eric.metz@ic.fbi.gov>; <daniel.baldwin@ic.fbi.gov>; <alejandro.barbeito@ic.fbi.gov>; <cary.gleicher@ic.fbi.gov>; <paul.haertel@ic.fbi.gov>; <greg.cox@ic.fbi.gov>; <lazaro.andino@ic.fbi.gov>; <gabriel.ramirez@ic.fbi.gov>; <tom.sobocinski@ic.fbi.gov>; <benjamin.walker@ic.fbi.gov>; <kirk.striebich@ic.fbi.gov>; Snyder, David<david.snyder@ic.fbi.gov>; <gregory.cox@ic.fbi.gov>; <katherine.andrews@ic.fbi.gov>; <carolyn.willson@ic.fbi.gov>; <mark.nowak@ic.fbi.gov>; <stuart.wirtz@ic.fbi.gov>; <lesley.buckler@ic.fbi.gov>; <daniel.dudzinski@ic.fbi.gov>; <william.peterson@ic.fbi.gov>; <connally.brown@ic.fbi.gov>; <leo.navarette@ic.fbi.gov>; <lawrence.futa@ic.fbi.gov>; <gregory.shaffer@ic.fbi.gov>; <daniel.clegg@ic.fbi.gov>; <adishaggarwala@yahoo.com>; <adishaggarwala@hotmail.com>; <vsondhi@luthra.com>; <muraritiwari.adv@gmail.com>; <adv.priyankatyagi@gmail.com>; <sarlakaushik@yahoo.com>; <goswamiandassociates@yahoo.co.in>; <vedbaldev@rediffmail.com>; <rakeshtikuadvocate@yahoo.com>; <kkmanan@rediffmail.com>; <ars.chauhan.co@gmail.com>; Usama Siddiqui<musiddiqui@gmail.com>; Rajiv Khosla<advrajivkhosla@gmail.com>; <rakeshkochar@hotmail.com>; <khatri.surya@hotmail.com>; puneet mittal<puneetmittal9@gmail.com>; advamit.sharma@gmail.com<advamit.sharma@gmail.com>; <Attorneynitin@yahoo.com>; Rajesh Mishra<attorney.rmishra@gmail.com>; <jaibirnagar@gmail.com>; <Sho-lodhicolony-dl@nic.in>; <csrhw@csrhw.com.cn>; <cnriec@chinacnr.com>; <raymond.l.conner@boeing.com>; <timothy.keating@boeing.com>; deepak@adlakha.com<deepak@adlakha.com>; deepak verma<justicedverma@gmail.com>; <dridzu@nic.in>; <radiology@primushospital.com>; Manish Sisodia<msisodia@gmail.com>; NDBox Library Reference<Libdel@state.gov>; <office@vinoddiwakar.com>; Om Prakash<oplawassociates@gmail.com>; Jatan Singh<jatan_singh@yahoo.com>; Abhijat Bal<abhijat.bal@gmail.com>; asutosh lohia<lasutosh@gmail.com>; Vikram Singh Panwar<vikrampanwar2010@gmail.com>; Anoop Bagai<anoopbagai@gmail.com>; <ashok.bhasin@yahoo.co.in>; Aruna Tiku<arunatikuadvocate@yahoo.com>; Sunil Mittal<sunilmittaladvocate@gmail.com>; Meghna Sankhla<meghna@sankhla.in>; <kadambari@ucolindia.com>; Kimmi Brara<kbrara@rediffmail.com>; Amit Sharma with khosla<advocateas@gmail.com>; Laxmi Chauhan<laxmichauhanmalhan@gmail.com>; Pankaj Kapoor<lawyerpankaj@gmail.com>; P.H. Parekh<pravin.parekh@pravinparekh.com>; <rakesh.sherawat@yahoo.com>; <jagdev_advocate@yahoo.com>; abhay kumar verma<akvadvocates@gmail.com>; <aman_sareen169@yahoo.com>; Manan Mishra<manankumarmishra@gmail.com>; ZAFAR AHMED Khan<zakhan52@gmail.com>; <anirveda_04@sifymail.com>; <prabakaran.president.tnaa@gmail.com>; <vbhatt.adv@gmail.com>; <goolamev@vsnl.net>; <faisalrizvi@hotmail.com>; <birisinghsinsinwar@indiatimes.com>; <advajithts@gmail.com>; <n_ramchanderrao@yahoo.com>; <agrnilesh73@gmail.com>; <kunals777@yahoo.com>; <chairman@ses-surat.org>; <bhojcthakur@yahoo.com>; <rmsinghadvocate@gmail.com>; Rohinton Nariman<rohintonnariman@gmail.com>; Satish Abarao Deshmukh<satish.adeshmukh@gmail.com>; <info@group30.org>; <poststelle@sta.berlin.de>; <public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk>; <webmaster.greco@coe.int>; <info@eurojust.europa.eu>; <poststelle@generalbundesanwalt.de>; <jthuy@eurojust.europa.eu>; <ejn@eurojust.europa.eu>; <collegesecretariat@eurojust.europa.eu>; <poststelle@bgh.bund.de>; <secretariat@cepol.europa.eu>
Cc: Seema Sapra<seema.sapra@gmail.com>; Seema Sapra<seemasapra@hotmail.com>
Subject: Complaint dated 13 April 2014 to the CJI, the Supreme Court Secretary
General and others from General Electric whistleblower Seema Sapra - Writ
Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 - in the matter of Seema Sapra v. General
Electric Company and Others in the Delhi High Court

Tonight I am sleeping in my car parked outside gate 8 of the Delhi
High Court. Delhi High Court orders in WP 1280/ 2012 direct the police
to protect my life and property. The Police has failed to provide me
with any security/ protection. CP Bassi must comply with the courts
directions and provide me with Z+ security.

The threat to my life issues from General Electric, the Indian State
including the police and the judiciary, Montek Ahluwalia, Gajendra
Haldea, A S Chandhiok, Gibson Dunn And Crutcher, Joseph Warin, John
Chesley, Jeffrey Immelt, John Rice, Brackett Denniston, Jeffrey
Eglash, Alexander Dimitrief, John Flannery, Bradford Berenson, Lorenzo
Simonelli, Tara Plimpton, Puneet Mahajan, Soli Sorabjee, Raian
Karanjawala, A K Sikri, Gita Mittal, P K Bhasin, Swatanter Kumar,
Sudershan Kumar Misra, Najmi Waziri, Suresh Kait, Badar Durrez Ahmed,
Maninder Singh,
Rajeeve Mehra, Arvind Nigam, Deepak Adlakha, Ruby Anand, Pratyush
Kumar, Ashfaq Nainar, Himali Arora, Gaurav Negi, Ashish Malhotra,
Inderjit Singh, Vinod Sharma etc because of my whistleblower
complaints in WP 1280/ 2012.

Necessary FIRs need to be registered
for past and ongoing conspiracies
and attempts to murder/ eliminate me.

I apprehend that I might be murdered/ eliminated or incapacitated
during the Delhi High Court holiidays and before 15
April 2014 when the captioned matter is listed before court. .

I have previously mentioned political and judicial abuse of psychiatry
in the Delhi High Court to target whistleblowers like S K Srivastava
and Nisha Bhatia. Please read more below in this connection.

When I read Delhi High Court Judge Bharihoke's order directing that
RAW officer Nisha Bhatia be admitted to a psychiatric facility, the
order struck me as strange. The order states that Bhatia partially
stripped in court in the morning, and therefore the judge posted the
matter in his chamber after lunch when Bhatia again stripped and
therefore had to physically removed and the hearing took place in her
absence with a lawyer Rita Kaul representing Bhatia.
Why would a judge post a matter in chamber when a woman litigant had
stripped before him in open court. The reasonable and expected
procedure would have been for Judge Bharihoke to hold a hearing in
open court and to surround Bhatia with policewomen to prevent her from
stripping again. How is it that Bhatia managed to strip a second time
before Judge Bharihoke in his chamber? Something about the order does
not ring true.

I met Nisha Bhatia in the Delhi High Court who is now enrolled as an
advocate (attorney) with the Bar Council and asked her what had
actually happened. She told me that while she did strip before J.
Bharihoke in open court the first time round, she did not strip or
attempt to strip before him during the chamber hearing. Judge
Bharihoke falsified his order to create this as the false reason to
have Bhatia removed and to hold the chamber hearing in her absence
when he passed the order directing that she be admitted to a
psychiatric facility.

Bhatia told me that Rita Kaul was never her lawyer. She told me that
she was taken to IHBAS (a government mental hospital) by the police
and without any examination by a doctor was locked up in a ward for
chronically ill mental patients and that she was drugged there. Her
forced incarceration there lasted a month. Bhatia told me that while
she was being drugged, Rita Kaul came to IHBAS and obtained Bhatia's
signatures on a vakalatnama. Bhatia also told me that the intent was
to incarcerate her and to destroy and damage her brain and
neurological system by forcing her to take psychotropic drugs, however
Bhatia refused medication after a few days.

Bhatia also told me that she never attempted suicide in the PMO and
that the police levelled a false allegation against her. She was
simply picked up from the PMO where she had gone seeking a meeting
with the Prime Minister and she was admitted to a government hospital
using a fabricated story that she had swallowed rat poison. It is
obvious that doctors at the government hospital colluded with the
police and State authorities targeting Bhatia in propagating this
false story and that Bhatia was most likely drugged during this
hospital stay.

Bhatia also confirmed to me that she was arrested and imprisoned in
jail by the Gurgaon police on false complaints by her neighbours that
she was harassing and threatening them.

Bhatia's ordeal discloses three ways in which attempts have been made
to similarly target me.

When I started complaining again in January 2012 that I was being
poisoned and when I named certain neighbours as being involved in
targeting me, some false complaints against me were procured from
those very neighbours and their servants. I was never informed about
those complaints. The first time that I became aware of those
complaints was when these were filed in court in my writ petition by
the Delhi Police along with its false counter affidavit dated July
2012. These complaints contained false statements that I was mentally
ill and that I was likely to harm myself or others. Bhatia also faced
similar targeting, however in her case she was actually arrested and
imprisoned based upon false complaints by her neighbours. Bhatia also
confirmed to me that she too had never been informed about these
complaints against her before her arrest.

Second, Rita Kaul attempted to reprise her deplorable, fraudulent and
unethical role in facilitating the incarceration of Bhatia in a
psychiatric facility in my case as well. In April - May 2013, she
conspired to obtain my signatures on a sheet of paper which stated
that an un-named entity/ person had given me an undisclosed amount of
money for my "help". I refused to sign such a document realising its
potential for misuse. DHCBA staff were used to facilitate this attempt
and A S Chandhiok was master-minding this. Another time, on 31 May
2013, Rita Kaul again suggested that I give her a letter stating that
she was authorised to speak on my behalf and that she would speak to
Delhi High Court Judge Gita Mittal. I later learnt from a public
prosecuter (Ms Ritu Gaba) that Judge Gita Mittal had asked her in
February 2013 whether the lady would help the judge to incarcerate me
in a mental asylum if the judge appointed her as an amicus curie in my
writ petition. To her credit, Ms Gaba told me that she had refused to
participate in this conspiracy to eliminate me.

Third, on the night of 1-2 October 2012, I stayed the entire night at
Police HQ after telling then Commissioner of Police Neeraj Kumar that
I had no place to stay. Around midnight, policemen acting on
instructions from someone called an ambulance to the police HQ after
making a false report that there was a medical emergency. The attempt
appears to have been to harm me and/or then remove me to a government
hospital on a false pretext that I had harmed myself in police HQ.
Again this would have been similar to the false complaint against
Bhatia that she had swallowed rat poison in the PMO. I foiled this
conspiracy by refusing to accept any offers of food or drink that
night from policemen and by emailing/ texting lawyers and journalists
about what was going on.

The political and judicial abuse using psychiatry of honest revenue
officer S K Srivastava who was blowing the whistle on money
laundering by a prominent media company NDTV also appears to have
inspired similar attempts to silence me. Mr Rakesh Tiku is a lawyer
who played an important role in the planned conspiracy to silence S K
Srivastava. Mr Rakesh Tiku has also been openly helping and advising
General Electric's lawyers (Nanju Ganpathy et al) in connection with
my corruption petition against GE. .

Mr S K Srivastava's whistleblowing activities also implicate a General
Electric subsidiary NBCU which transferred over Rs 800 crores to NDTV
in 2007-2008 in what Indian income tax authorities have found to be
sham and non genuine transactions with no commercial purpose or
economic substance and whose sole objective was to cause this gain to
NDTV and a concomitant loss to NBCU. Further Mr S K Srivastava was
also making complaints that NDTV was involved in laundering bribe
money for Mr P Chidambaram, a senior cabinet minister who was minister
for home affairs and is at present the minister for finance.

Mr S K Srivastava was targeted using women revenue officers who lodged
false complaints against him for sexual harassment and even rape. He
was suspended from work. He approached the Central Administrative
Tribunal (CAT) which reinstated him.

Mr S K Srivastava's ordeal intensified in the Delhi High Court. The 2
IRS women officers targeting him filed a petition seeking deletion of
adverse remarks regarding them in the CAT order. This was achieved
after Rakesh Tiku acting as counsel for Srivastava agreed to a consent
order. This order resulted in expunging from the judicial record the
entire bqckground of Srivastava's whistleblowing and his complaints of
corruption against these 2 women officers. The case history of this
matter shows that Rakesh Tiku had not produced any vakalatnama for
Srivastava yet he agreed to a consent order that was not in
Srivastava's interest.

Once the material in Srivastava's favor was expunged from the court
record, the 2 women were used to launch an onslaught against
Srivastava in the Delhi High Court. Writ petitions were filed against
him seeking investigation of the false sexual harassment complaints
against him. In these proceedings a strange ex parte court injunction
was issued against Srivastava by Judge Muralidhar restraining him from
writing any communications that mirrored a letter on the court record.
What was contained or objectionable in that letter was never spelt
out. One can assume that this injunction also effectively restrained
Srivastava from pursuing his whistleblowing complaints or from
defending himself against the false complaints made against him for
rape and sexual harassment. Srivastava continued to pursue his
complaints however and his subsequent communications were treated as
contempt of court.

How could Judge Muralidhar in a writ petition restrain a private party
from making complaints against his colleagues of corruption and of
sexual favors being rendered in lieu of bribes. This amounted to an
ex-parte restriction on Srivastava's fundamental right to freedom of
speech and conscience. If the women were agrieved they ought to have
instituted criminal and civil proceedings against Srivastava for
defamation. How could Srivastava's corruption complaints against 2
corrupt IRS women officers accusing them additionally of moral
turpitude amount to sexual harassment, on which basis the first
injunction order was passed by Judge Muralidhar. And how could such
complaints amount to contempt of court which resulted in the
initiation of multiple contempt proceedings against Srivastava even
after the original writ petition was disposed off with no finding of
sexual harassment by Srivastava.

I have looked at the orders passed in these matters and in other
proceedings initiated by Srivastava and at the case histories of these
proceedings which are publicly available. There are several disturbing
red flags about how Srivastava's whistleblowing was sought to be
silenced in a clear and planned conspiracy involving several lawyers
and judges. First anything that Srivastava filed in his defence or
describing the larger whistleblowing background as to why he was being
targeted was "withdrawn" by counsel who were purporting to represent
him. In most cases, no vakalatnamas were filed by these lawyers to
establish their authority to represent Srivastava. Statements were
made on behalf of Srivastava by these lawyers without producing
vakalatnamas. An apology was tendered on Srivastava's behalf
(amounting to an admission of guilt that he had committed contempt of
court) by counsel purporting to represent him and without his
instructions. Srivastava confirmed to me that several acts were done
on his behalf in court without his instructions. In his words, several
mistakes were made but he did not want to cross swords with lawyers
and turn them all against him and he strategically wanted to retain
focus on his complaints against Chidambaram.

In the multiple adverse orders passed in the contempt cases,
Srivastava is depicted as writing letters targeting Shumana Sen and
Ashima Neb and as having used explicit language accusing them of
providing sexual favors in lieu of bribes and calling them
prostitutes. Srivastava confirmed to me that some letters had been
circulated under his name with his signatures having been forged.
However even if Srivastava used explicit language against these women
in complaints against them to authorities, how would that by itself
amount to sexual harassment or to contempt of court.

Eventually the contempt cases resulted in court orders finding
Srivastava guilty of contempt of court for sending complaints against
Shumana Sen and Ashima Neb to the authorities. An order was passed
sentencing Srivastava to two weeks imprisonment.

This order was appealed on behalf of Srivastava. On the first hearing
of his appeal, a lawyer claiming to represent Srivastava, Kamini
Jaiswal, further betrayed Srivastava by telling the court that her
client was willing to undergo a psychiatric evaluation as an in-house
patient in VIMHANS, a privately run mental hospital. Such a submission
by Kamini Jaiswal on behalf of Srivastava is indefensible and was
totally contrary to her client's interest and in fact facilitated his
psychiatric abuse which followed. The court therefore postponed his
sentence until after Srivastava's psychiatric evaluation.

Srivastava appears to have been admittted to VIMHANS against his wishes.

A report on Srivastava's psychiatric evaluation was sent by VIMHANS to
the 0elhi High Court in sealed cover without providing Srivastava with
a copy. The judges hearing his matter (Judge Sanjay Kishan Kaul and
Judge Indermeet Kaur) refused to provide a copy of this medical
report to Srivastava or to disclose its contents to Srivastava and
instead declared in their order that he had been found to be mentally
ill and there were serious concerns regarding his mental health and
therefore he should not be assigned any work by the government and no
one should pay any attention to any communication sent by Srivastava.
This was a gross denial by these judges of Srivastava's human rights.

Srivastava told me that it was unethical for Judge Sanjay Kishan Kaul
to hear his contempt appeal because the judge's brother Neeraj Kishan
Kaul was representing and advising Shumana Sen and Ashima Neb. Also it
was unethical for Judge Indermeet Kaur to hear Srivastava's contempt
appeal because she had earlier passed orders against him sitting
singly in one of the contempt petitions filed against him.

Srivastava approached the Supreme Court of India which directed that
he be provided with a copy of his medical report by VIMHANS.

Srivastava also complained to the Medical Councils against the
psychiatrists and doctors at VIMHANS who were forced to admit that the
report sent by them to the Delhi High Court about Srivastava was
misleading and liable to be misinterpreted. They signed an affidavit
saying that Srivastava did not suffer from any psychiatric disorder.

Despite this about-turn by the doctors from VIMHANS, the judges of the
Delhi High Court (first a Division Bench of J. Sanjay Kishan Kaul and
J. Indermeet Kaur and later a Division Bench of J. Badar Durrez Ahmed
and J. Vibhu Bakhru) refused to pass an order withdrawing their
earlier "judicial finding" about Srivastava's mental illness and their
directions that his communications be ignored by everyone and that he
not be allocated any work.

Instead, Judge Badar Durrez Ahmed and Judge Vibhu Bakhru targeted
Srivastava further by passing an order dismissing his contempt appeal
and directing that he serve the prison sentence of 2 weeks imposed
upon him for contempt since he was now claiming to be medically fit.

Srivastava's appeal from this decision to the Supreme Court of India
is still to be heard.

A similar strategy was adopted for my complaints against General
Electric and the advice was visibly being given to GE's Indian lawyers
by Rakesh Tiku.

I filed my writ petition against General Electric in February 2012. In
July 2012, a fraudulent petition was filed purporting to be on behalf
of GE in the Delhi High Court invoking the Indian Arbitration and
Conciliation Act and seeking an injunction against me restraining me
from disclosing confidential information about GE. The petition did
not disclose the nature of the writ petition or that the injunction
would interfere with the administration of justice in the writ
petition. This injunction order was also passed by Judge Muralidhar
and in fact he stated while passing it that the order was incapable of
being implemented and that GE would be back with a contempt petition.
A contempt petition was filed against me and Judge Muralidhar issued
notice on it without permitting me to speak and point out why notice
should not be issued.

I was then compelled to seek recusal by Judge Muralidhar and stated in
an application filed by me in OMP 647 of 2012 that it appeared he had
been approached by General Electric and that he was knowingly passing
orders in the OMP that would interfere with the administration of
justice in the whistleblower writ petition.

I followed it up with a complaint to the Chief Justice of India
against Judge Muralidhar.

After researching how whistleblower Srivastava was deliberately netted
in questionable and legally untenable contempt cases and was
eventually sought to be silenced misusing the Delhi High Court's
contempt jurisdiction, and the initial enabling role played by Judge
Muralidhar in Srivastava's case, I cannot but notice similarities in
my case where I am also being targeted using criminal contempt
proceedings. The fact that Judge Muralidhar has been instrumental in
initiating a criminal contempt proceeding against me (where my
position is that no show cause notice has been issued to me or indeed
could have been issued to me by Judge Muralidhar) and that he played a
similar role in targeting Srivastava is very revealing.
This further butresses my complaint against Juidge Muralidhar that he
had been approached by General Electric.


Last night I was harassed outside gate 8 of the Delhi High Court at
night by several men.

I was again poisoned during the day today in three different incidents
when poisonous chemicals were deliberately released near me.

Also I have sent the following email yesterday to the police and
others including to the address mentioned in the email below.

"To seemasapraalert@gmail.com,

Can you identify yourself. Who are you? You are anonymously targeting
me on the internet at http://seemasapraalert.blogspot.in/. I attach a
document containing the trash and lies you have published about me.

I have taken screen shots of your post. I will be making police
complaints against you and seeking criminal prosecution against you.
Your statements also amount to contempt of the Delhi High Court as
they are intended to interfere with the administration of justice in
Writ Petition 1280 of 2012 being heard by the Delhi High Court against
General Electric Company for corruption, fraud, forgery, bribery etc.
You are targeting a whistle-blower and a witness in a corruption case.

Seema Sapra"


Seema Sapra


--
Seema Sapra