From: Seema Sapra <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:27 PM
Subject: audio of coughing attached -: Jeff Immelt having General Electric whistle-blower being poisoned with nerve agents who requests for witness protection from US Government - WP Civil 1280 of 2012, a corruption whistle-blower petition in the Delhi High Court (Seema Sapra v General Electric Company & Others)
To: pmosb <email@example.com>, Amit Shah <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Sanjay Jain <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Bhim Sain Bassi <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "Madder, Emily" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, rajshekhar rao <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, _EDA-Vertretung-New-Delhi <email@example.com>, _EDA-VISA New-Delhi <firstname.lastname@example.org>, _EDA-Etat Civil New Delhi <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, indconru indconru <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "LegalisationEnquiries@fco.gov.uk" <LegalisationEnquiries@fco.gov.uk>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Ambassaden New Delhi <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "InfoDesk@ohchr.org" <InfoDesk@ohchr.org>, "Press-Info@ohchr.org" <Press-Info@ohchr.org>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "VA@ndh.rep.admin.ch" <VA@ndh.rep.admin.ch>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, "Dimitrief, Alexander (GE, Corporate)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "Eglash, Jeffrey C (GE, Corporate)" <email@example.com>, Nanju Ganpathy <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "CHAIRMANOFFICE@SEC.GOV" <CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "NDwebmail@state.gov" <NDwebmail@state.gov>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "Loretta_A._Preska@nysd.uscourts.gov" <Loretta_A._Preska@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Directors@corporate.ge.com, Siemens Ombudsman COM <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, CATshareservices@cat.com, BusinessPractices@cat.com, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Jean-David.email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, Jonah Spector <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, "Warin, F. Joseph" <email@example.com>, "Chesley, John" <JChesley@gibsondunn.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Priyanka Tyagi <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, kkmanan <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Rajiv Khosla <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, puneet mittal <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>, Attorneynitin@yahoo.com, Rajesh Mishra <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, deepak verma <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Om Prakash <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Jatan Singh <email@example.com>, Abhijat Bal <firstname.lastname@example.org>, asutosh lohia <email@example.com>, Vikram Singh Panwar <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Aruna Tiku <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Sunil Mittal <email@example.com>, Meghna Sankhla <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Amit Sharma with khosla <email@example.com>, Pankaj Kapoor <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "P.H. Parekh" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, abhay kumar verma <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Manan Mishra <email@example.com>, ZAFAR AHMED Khan <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Nilesh Kumar <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, raj mohan singh tanwar <email@example.com>, Rohinton Nariman <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Satish Abarao Deshmukh <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, CP@ohchr.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Ranjit Kumar <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, Narasimha Pamidighantam <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Jual Oram <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, SS Ahluwalia <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, Balbir Punj <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Kiran Maheshwari <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, "T. C. Gehlot" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, Dharmendra Pradhan <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Tapir Gao <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Anand Chaudhary <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Satish Velankar <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, Bhupender Yadav <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "P.K Krishnadas" <email@example.com>, "Dr. Anil Jain" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, TRIVENDRA SINGH RAWAT <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Rameshwar Chaurasia <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Sudha Malaiya <email@example.com>, Poonam Mahajan R <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Arun Jain <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, "V. Shanmuganathan" <email@example.com>, PRAKASH JAVADEKAR <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, Nirmala Sitharaman <email@example.com>, "Dr. B S Shastri" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Meenakshi Lekhi <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Captain Abhimanyu <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, kk manan <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Usama Siddiqui <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Mukul Rohatgi <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, Senator@mccain.senate.gov, suresh prabhu <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, Manpreet Lamba <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "email@example.com" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, Commandant 11 rac <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Kent Walker <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Eric Schmidt <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, David Drummond <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, Jeff Huber <email@example.com>, Patrick Pichette <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Jonathan Rosenberg <email@example.com>, Daniel Alegre <firstname.lastname@example.org>, John Fitzpatrick <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org
Cc: Seema Sapra <email@example.com>, Seema Sapra <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To the President of the United States, the SEC, the FBI and the United States' Department of Justice,AndTo the President and Prime Minister of India, and the Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court,AndTo all others,Last night and this morning nerve and chemical agents were again released into my current accommodation between midnight and 8 am while I was asleep. These included nerve agents or a muscle relaxant which caused numbness in the hands, nausea, breathlessness, sudden bowel movement, and cough with mucus upon movement. Acrid irritating fumes and a gas/fumes smelling like a solvent were also released which caused severe respiratory irritation, pain in the abdomen, cough, nausea and mucus in the airways.These chemicals were again released into my accommodation through the day at intervals and particularly towards the evening.I am recording the coughing and will produce the recordings in court/Attempts to murder me continue.I once again request that the US government provide me with witness protection.Jeffrey Immelt wants me dead.Seema Sapra
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Seema Sapra <email@example.com> wrote:
To the President of the United States, the SEC, the FBI, the DOJ, Mr John Kerry (Secretary of State), and Mr Richard Verma (US Ambassador to India),AndTo the President and Prime Minister of India, and the Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court,AndTo all others,
Since the evening of 22 January 2015, various toxic chemicals are being released into my apartment, through the day, at night and even while I am asleep.
These include nerve agents, acrid poisonous fumes and poisonous gases.Montek Singh Ahluwalia & Jeff Immelt continue to have me poisoned while Judge Valmiki Mehta and Judge P S Teji are being used to sabotage the writ petition.I fear for my life and might be murdered before 3 Feb 2015, the next date of hearing in the matter.I again request that the US government provide me witness protection.Seema Sapra
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Seema Sapra <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
To the President of the United States, the SEC, the FBI, the DOJ, Mr John Kerry (Secretary of State), and Mr Richard Verma (US Ambassador to India),AndTo the President and Prime Minister of India, and the Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court,AndTo all others,After a hearing which lasted about an hour, Writ Petition Civil 1280/ 2012 has been adjourned to 3 February 2015. I will comment upon today's hearing and the order passed today in due course. I do point out that Judge Valmiki Mehta's conduct today confirmed for me that he has been approached by General Electric and he is attempting to cover up the corruption complaints against General Electric and that he intends to deny me a hearing in this matter. Judge P S Teji, recently appointed to the High Court is going along with Judge Valmiki Mehta in this corrupt attempted cover-up.I request the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court to ensure that the order for today's hearing is uploaded on the Delhi High Court website at the earliest.Meanwhile toxic chemical fumes were again released into my accommodation this evening. And I was again targeted in the Delhi High Court before the hearing today.Seema SapraOn Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Seema Sapra <email@example.com> wrote:
To the President of the United States, the SEC, the FBI, the DOJ, Mr John Kerry (Secretary of State), and Mr Richard Verma (US Ambassador to India),AndAndTo all others,I attach written submissions dated 22 January 2015 which have been filed by me in Writ Petition Civil 1280/ 2012. I will be relying upon these written submissions during today's court hearing scheduled for 3 30 pm.These are also reproduced hereinbelow.Seema SapraIn the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at New DelhiCivil Writ JurisdictionWrit Petition No. 1280 of 2012IN THE MATTER OF:Seema Sapra …PetitionerversusGeneral Electric Company and Others ….RespondentsWRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER DATED 22 JANUARY 2015 RESPONDING TO THE HEARING OF THIS WRIT PETITION BEFORE A DIVISION BENCH OF JUDGE VALMIKI MEHTA AND JUDGE P S TEJI ON 19 AND 20 JANUARY 2015 AND THE ATTEMPT TO COVER UP THE CORRUPTION COMPLAINTS AGAINST GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AND TO COVER UP THAT A FRAUD HAS BEEN PLAYED ON THIS COURT AND AN IMPERSONATOR HAS FALSELY REPRESENTED HIMSELF AS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY OF THE GENERAL ELECTRIC RESPONDENTS AND HAS BEEN USED TO FILE FALSE AND PERJURIOUS AFFIDAVITS, FABRICATE EVIDENCE AND TO TARGET THE PETITIONER-WITNESS-WHISTLEBLOWER1. This matter has been listed before a Special Division Bench comprised of Judge Valmiki Mehta and Judge P S Teji on 19 and 20 January 2015. On both those days, this matter was taken up between 3 30 pm and 4 30 pm. The matter is now listed before this Bench on 22 January 2015 at 3 30 pm. These written submissions are being filed because of the nature of the hearings before this Bench on 19 and 20 January 2015.2. On both 19 and 20 January 2015, Judge Valmiki Mehta & Judge P S Teji repeatedly prevented the Petitioner from making her submissions or from arguing pending applications in this matter and kept suggesting that because the 2010 tenders had been cancelled, they need not decide the writ petition on merits.3. Whenever the petitioner sought to make submissions, Judge Valmiki Mehta would interrupt the petitioner, and when the petitioner submitted that she had a right to be heard, Judge Vamiki Mehta repeatedly threatened the Petitioner that he "controlled" the court proceedings.4. The stratagem adopted by the Bench appears to be to prevent the petitioner from arguing her applications, or arguing on the merits of the writ petition by interrupting her and changing the subject every time the petitioner attempts to make her submissions by suddenly asking the petitioner to address another unrelated question. Then if the petitioner attempts to continue with her original submission, Judge Valmiki Mehta repeatedly interrupts her and starts issuing her warnings in an intimidating tone that she was not answering his question which question it is submitted was raised only to interrupt the petitioner in her original submission.5. Judge Valmiki Mehta has used this stratagem several times over the last two hearings. He has also repeatedly attempted to use this stratagem to get the petitioner to react and say something which he could then use against her to deny her a hearing. For instance, he has been saying things that if the petitioner does not want to answer the court's questions then she should say so. The petitioner has avoided falling into this trap. Judge Valmiki Mehta and Judge P S Teji have deployed a planned strategy to disrupt the petitioner's submissions and to frustrate her right to be heard.6. Also, for both the hearings, a large posse of policemen and policewomen (from Delhi High Court Police security) have been used to harass and target the petitioner outside the court room both before the start of the hearing and after the conclusion of the hearing. On both days, RAC guards have been used to release toxic chemicals near the petitioner just before the hearing. The policemen placed outside court 9 are also preventing lawyers from entering the court room during the hearing essentially converting an open court hearing into a secret session. Further a captive and prearranged audience has been placed in the court room on both hearings comprised of groups of 3-4 legal interns. There appears to a nefarious purpose behind this and a pre-planned conspiracy to use this prearranged audience to misrepresent court proceedings at a later time.7. On both 19 and 20 January, Judge Valmiki Mehta and Judge P S Teji have not permitted the petitioner to even move beyond reading and discussing the prayer clause of the writ petition.8. It is pointed out that the cancellation of the 2010 tenders does not affect the issues before the court in the writ petition and in pending applications except that the prayer for disqualification of General Electric from the 2010 tenders need not be granted. All the other prayers and issues arising from the composite court record and pleadings are not affected in any manner by the cancellation of the 2010 tenders. Also there are pending applications and several procedural issues which require to be addressed by the court before the writ petition can be heard on merits and finally decided.9. The writ petition raises the issue that the Railway Ministry, the PMO, the CVC, and the CBI have ignored and failed to deal with the corruption complaints and evidence against General Electric in accordance with law. Documents, affidavits and evidence filed in this writ petition not only establish this but also establish multiple desperate attempts by the Railway Ministry, the PMO, the CVC and the CBI to cover up the corruption complaints against General Electric and Montek Singh Ahluwalia. These cover up attempts have included filing of false, unauthorised and perjurious affidavits by the State respondents, fabrication of evidence, and a desperate cancellation of the tenders by the Railway Ministry in a colourable exercise of power whose sole purpose is to cover up the corruption complaints and an attempt to avoid a decision of this writ petition on merits. This cover up has been expressly pleaded by the Petitioner and this Court cannot avoid ruling on the issue of the cover up. It appears as if Judge Valmiki Mehta and Judge P S Teji also want to facilitate a cover up of these corruption complaints by avoiding looking at these affidavits, documents, and evidence on the court record.10. This writ petition is also a right to life petition where the petitioner has sought witness and whistleblower protection. Unfortunately, the petitioner has continued to be targeted, drugged, poisoned and has even been deformed during the pendency of this writ petition with judges either being mute spectators or in multiple cases actively participating in targeting the petitioner and in conspiracies to cover up her corruption complaints and in conspiracies to eliminate her.11. The petitioner continues to be poisoned and toxic chemical fumes and gases were released into her current accommodation and car even on 19, 20, 21 and 22 January 2015 with intent to poison the petitioner.12. Some (but not all) of the pending issues, procedural issues, applications which need to be decided before the writ petition can be heard on merits include the following:(i) General Electric Company and its two subsidiaries have failed to appear before this court and an impersonator (Mr K Radhakrishnan) has been used to impersonate as authorised signatory of these three respondents using false, invalid and fabricated authority documents. Lawyers claiming to represent these respondents are appearing without valid vakalatnamas. This issue which has been raised by the Petitioner since October 2012 but has still not been taken up by the Court. Pending applications on this issue include CM 18642 of 2012; CM 19370/2012; CM 19863 of 2012; CM 522 of 2013; CM 10493 of 2013; CM 18969 of 2014 and CM 20069 of 2014. This is a very serious fraud on the court which has made a mockery of these proceedings and constitutes impersonation and perjury and the court cannot avoid a ruling on this issue, Lawyers cannot be allowed to represent the General Electric respondents without vakalatnamas. Further fresh notice is required to be issued to the three General Electric respondents who have failed to appear before the Court through an authorised representative and it is obvious that the writ petition cannot be decided until the General Electric respondents appear before this Court. This fraud personally affects the petitioner as it further endangers her life, also the impersonator has been used to target and defame the petitioner in affidavits and applications in the most vicious and vile manner resulting in further violation of her fundamental right to life.(ii) Siemens AG a bidder in the Madhepura Project tenders during 2009, 2010 and 2013 is not present before the court despite being a necessary and required party. The petitioner's applications for impleadment and issuance of notice to Siemens AG (CM 3380/ 2013 and 3855/ 2013) on this issue need to be taken up and decided. Siemens AG continues to be a necessary party despite cancellation of the 2010 Madhepura tender. Notice has been issued to all other bidders who have all appeared except in the case of General Electric as described above. Any order passed in this matter will affect the rights of Siemens AG in connection with its bid for the Madhepura Project.(iii) The Railway Ministry has filed unauthorised, false and perjurious affidavits and has attempted to cover up the corruption complaints and to protect General Electric and this has been exposed by the Petitioner in her rejoinder affidavits and in CM 19501/2012, CM 19820/ 2012 and in CM 7197/ 2013. These issues of cover up by the Railway Ministry and the conduct of the State respondents before this court cannot be avoided by the Bench.(iv) The petitioner's application (CM 6417/ 2013) on the issue of fraudulent representation of the Rail Ministry and the CVC before this court and on the need for proper affidavits from these respondents needs to be decided first.(v) The Petitioner's applications on the threat to her life, physical harm caused and continuing to be caused to her and her prayer for witness protection need to be decided first before the Petitioner should be asked to argue the petition on merits. These include CM 2770/ 2012; CM 8677/ 2012; CM 326/ 2013; CM 428/ 2013; CM 1223/ 2013; CM 2477/2013; CM 5007/ 2013; CM 5008/2013; and CM 19473/2014. The Petitioner cannot be expected to argue this matter while she continues to be poisoned and targeted. In addition, the Petitioner has filed voluminous documents including medical records, pictures, videos, audio recordings, affidavits and complaints made over 20111, 2012, 2013 and 2014 in connection with her being targeted. Further the Petitioner is being forced to make daily complaints about the relentless targeting she is being subjected to and these are being sent to several authorities including the Police Commissioner, the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court and to several US authorities. The petitioner's left foot and ankle were deliberately twisted by a doctor in June 2014 in an attempt to force her into surgery as part of the conspiracy to eliminate her. The Petitioner still has a dislocated ankle. She has been permanently deformed. (And this happened while Judge Sistani and Judge Pathak were hearing this matter who subsequently attempted to cover this up). The police affidavits and status reports are also false and unauthorised and the petitioner has exposed this in her affidavits. The Police has failed to protect the petitioner and has only been used to facilitate the attacks on the petitioner. These issues and the contempt of court committed by the Commissioner of Police also need to be gone into by the court in detail.13. The Petitioner submits that the proper course for this Court would be to first issue notice on and take up the Petitioner's applications on the issue of impersonation of General Electric before this Court as that will end the attempt at cover up of the Petitioner's complaints and the attempted sabotage of this writ petition. This order will also in fact be most effective in helping safeguard the Petitioner's life and will compel the appearance of General Electric Company before this Court through an authorised and accountable representative.14. The Petitioner asked this Bench on 19 January 2015 to take up her application CM 18969/ 2014 on this issue of impersonation of General Electric but Judge Valmiki Mehta did not allow this. Instead the Petitioner was told to first respond to the fact that the 2010 tenders had been cancelled. The Petitioner was not even permitted to make her submissions on this issue by Judge Valmiki Mehta who kept interrupting her, cutting her off and diverting the topic every time the petitioner tried to point out facts or submissions. Judge Valmiki Mehta kept repeating that the 2010 tenders had been cancelled suggesting that he is not interested in deciding the matter on merits. Judge Valmiki Mehta prevented CM 18969/2014 on the issue of impersonation of General Electric from being taken up for hearing. At 4 30 pm, Judge Valmiki Mehta adjourned the matter to 20 January at 3 30 pm and then attempted to pass an order misrepresenting that the petitioner had made her arguments. When the Petitioner objected stating that she had not made her arguments, Judge Valmiki Mehta refused to dictate the order in court and insisted that he would dictate the order in his chambers. It is pointed out that court orders are required to be passed in open court.15. Further the Petitioner was prevented from reading the order passed by Judge Valmiki Mehta in his chamber before the hearing on 20 January, even though the Petitioner has the right to read the order before any further hearing in the matter. On 20 January the Petitioner repeatedly requested JudgeValmiki Mehta before the lunch break that she be permitted to read the court order for the hearing on 19 January before the scheduled hearing at 3 30 pm. However, Judge Valmiki Mehta refused to allow the Petitioner to read the order. The Petitioner's right to read the order dated 19 January 2015 was deliberately defeated by Judge Valmiki Mehta with intent to obstruct her from appealing against the said order before the Supreme Court of India. The order had not been uploaded on the Delhi High Court website and neither could the Petitioner inspect the file as it was lying in Judge Valmiki Mehta's court-room.16. Finally as a result of the Petitioner written protests she was read out the order dated 19 January 2015 in court when the hearing commenced on 20 January 2015.17. On 20 January 2015, the Petitioner was again not permitted by the Bench to make her submissions in the matter and the entire one hour was taken up discussing the prayer clause of the writ petition and the impact of cancellation of the 2010 tenders. The matter was adjourned to 22 January.18. The orders dated 19 and 20 January 2015 have now been uploaded on the website of the Delhi High Court and are reproduced below.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIW.P.(C) 1280/2012SEEMA SAPRA ..... PetitionerThrough: Petitioner in person.versusGENERAL ELECTRIC CO AND ORS. ..... RespondentsThrough: Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Adv. for R-1, 6and 7.Mr. Om Prakash, Adv. with Ms.Honey Kolawan, Adv. for Ministry ofRailways.Ms. Firdouse Qutbwani and Ms.Yaamni Sharma, Advs. for R-13.Ms. Zehra Khan, Adv. for R-14CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. TEJIO R D E R19.01.2015Petitioner has been heard with respect to the writ petition and itsprayers. Thus part arguments have been heard.To come up for further arguments tomorrow ie 20.1.2015 at 3.30 PM.VALMIKI J. MEHTA, JP.S. TEJI, JJANUARY 19, 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIW.P.(C) 1280/2012SEEMA SAPRA ..... PetitionerThrough: Petitioner in person.versusGENERAL ELECTRIC CO AND ORS. ..... RespondentsThrough: Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Adv. for R-1, 6and 7.Mr. Om Prakash, Adv. with Ms.Honey Kolawar, Adv. for Ministry ofRailways.Ms. Firdouse Qutbwani Adv. for R-13.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTAHON?BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. TEJIO R D E R20.01.20151. We have heard the petitioner further.2. List for further arguments on behalf of the petitioner on 22nd January, 2015 at 3.30 P.M.VALMIKI J. MEHTA, JP.S. TEJI, JJANUARY 20, 201519. Note that both the orders dated 19 and 20 January fail to even mention the several miscellaneous applications which are pending and which were listed before the Court on 19 and 20 January 2015 along with the writ petition.20. Note that both these orders record the appearance of Mr Manpreet Lamba as counsel for respondents 1, 6 and 7, i.e., the three General Electric respondents. These orders are therefore illegal as no Court can permit a lawyer to represent a party without a valid and proper vakalatnama. As stated above, on both 19 and 20 January, the Petitioner's applications on this issue including CM 18969/ 2014 were not taken up for hearing despite the Petitioner's requests. It is clear that Judge Valmiki Mehta and Judge P S Teji are attempting to cover up this fraud on the court, the Government of India and on the Petitioner and are deliberately preventing these applications from being taken up and this issue from being decided. This is also the reason why these Judges are scrambling for a way to dispose of this writ petition without deciding any of the issues arising therein.21. [In May 2012, Judge Valmiki Mehta heard the matter sitting in a single Bench although the roster required this matter to be heard by a Division Bench. Such conduct has been described by the Supreme Court of India as corrupt and improper conduct by a Judge. At that time, Judge Valmiki Mehta participated in a conspiracy effectuated by Judge P K Bhasin to prevent any counter affidavits from being filed in this matter and to facilitate the petitioner being harmed and eliminated over the 2012 summer vacations by preventing this matter from being heard in May 2012.]22. Judge Valmiki Mehta obstructed the Petitioner's right to approach the Supreme Court of India against the order dated 19 January 2015 in a Special Leave Petition, again pointing towards judicial corruption. This is another reason why Judge Valmiki Mehta should not hear this matter.23. Note that the order dated 19 January 2015, does not record the limited nature of the hearing on 19 January 2015. It seeks to misrepresent that the petitioner had made part arguments when in fact the petitioner was not permitted to make any submissions on that date on account of being actively prevented from doing so by Judge Valmiki Mehta as described hereinabove.24. On 19 January 2015, when the petitioner was trying to get the court to take up CM 18969/2014, Judge Valmiki Mehta stopped her from doing so and told her to address the court on the threat to her life. When the Petitioner continued to press for CM 18969/2014 to be heard, Judge Valmiki Mehta misrepresented that the petitioner had refused to answer his questions on the threat to her life and had no evidence except what he described as her "self-serving statements". The petitioner was therefore compelled to shift to the issue of the threat to her life and when she started taking the court through CM 5008/2013 referencing medical records establishing that she had been poisoned, Judge Valmiki Mehta abruptly interrupted her and adjourned the matter to the next day. So in effect the petitioner made no arguments on 19 January 2015 because she was not permitted to do this, yet Judge Valmiki Mehta has misrepresented in the order that the petitioner has made part arguments with respect to the writ petition and its prayers.25. The order dated 20 January also mis-records that the Petitioner was heard. Once again she was not permitted to make her submissions on the pending applications or on the merits of the writ petition.26. It is submitted that the Petitioner intends to approach the Supreme Court of India against the orders dated 19 and 20 January 2015 and that she be permitted to do so before any further hearing of the writ petition on merits.27. Also, it is submitted that the court first hear the petitioner on pending procedural issues and on the other issues and applications which are pending and some of which have been mentioned hereinabove.28. The petitioner would also like to respond to any queries from the Bench on the issue of the effect of the cancellation of the 2010 tenders on the writ petition by way of an affidavit so that the petitioner's submissions are on record.29. Further, it is pointed out that a summary disposal of this writ petition without going into the merits of the various issues is not possible and any attempt to do so appears prima facie to be an attempt at cover up by avoiding consideration of the court record.30. Further it is also pointed out that the corruption complaints are now before the court, evidence of cover up is also before the court and the court cannot now refuse to look at the affidavits, documents and evidence on record by saying that the State authorities will investigate the complaints. This is because the evidence on record clearly establishes multiple attempts by the State respondents to cover up these complaints and the court is bound to go into the conduct of the State respondents and into the demonstrated failure of the State respondents to respond to and act upon the Petitioner's complaints in accordance with law.31. Unfortunately for all the reasons set out above, the Petitioner is constrained to record her apprehensions about the conduct and intent of the Division Bench comprising Judge Valmiki Mehta and Judge P S Teji and to express her reasonable doubts about this Bench and her consequent lack of faith in this Bench.
32. The Petitioner was exposed to toxic chemicals after the hearing on 20 January, throughout the day on 21 January, and today on 22 January including while she was preparing these written submissions. The intent is to prevent the petitioner from pursuing and prosecuting this writ petition. These short written submissions are therefore being filed and the Petitioner reserves her right to further supplement her submissions including by producing relevant case law on the material points as to how the Court must proceed in this writ petition.Place: New Delhi Petitioner in Person22 January 2015 Seema SapraRendered homeless since May 30, 2012 as a result of corruption complaints against General Electric and as a result of this whistle-blower corruption petition (W.P. (C) 1280/ 2012) and presently homeless9582716748
In the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at New DelhiCivil Writ JurisdictionWrit Petition No. 1280 of 2012IN THE MATTER OF:Seema Sapra …PetitionerversusGeneral Electric Company and Others ….RespondentsINDEX
No. Particulars Page 1 WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER DATED 22 JANUARY 2015 RESPONDING TO THE HEARING OF THIS WRIT PETITION BEFORE A DIVISION BENCH OF JUDGE VALMIKI MEHTA AND JUDGE P S TEJI ON 19 AND 20 JANUARY 2015 AND THE ATTEMPT TO COVER UP THE CORRUPTION COMPLAINTS AGAINST GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AND TO COVER UP THAT A FRAUD HAS BEEN PLAYED ON THIS COURT AND AN IMPERSONATOR HAS FALSELY REPRESENTED HIMSELF AS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY OF THE GENERAL ELECTRIC RESPONDENTS AND HAS BEEN USED TO FILE FALSE AND PERJURIOUS AFFIDAVITS, FABRICATE EVIDENCE AND TO TARGET THE PETITIONER-WITNESS-WHISTLEBLOWER 1-11Place: New Delhi Petitioner in Person22 January 2015 Seema SapraRendered homeless since May 30, 2012 as a result of corruption complaints against General Electric and as a result of this whistleblower corruption petition (W.P. (C) 1280/ 2012) and presently homeless9582716748Note: All 17 respondents have been served with an advance copy of this document by email dated 22 January 2015.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Seema Sapra <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
AndAndTo all others,Fumes of very toxic chemical agents are being released into my apartment since 6 30 am this morning.I am being poisoned. Persons who want me dead are Jeff Immelt, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, John Rice, Brackett Denniston, etc.I am being poisoned like vermin.Can you please get Jeff Immelt to stop having me poisoned.Seema Sapra
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Seema Sapra <email@example.com> wrote:
AndAndTo all others,Writ Petition Civil 1280/ 2012 has been adjourned to 22 January 2015 after some arguments.I continue to be poisoned. Pesticides were introduced into my car while it was parked outside the Delhi High Court today. Also some poisonous gas/ chemical fumes are being released into my apartment since the last 2 hours. The poisoning has intensified because I have indicated my intention to approach the Supreme Court of India.I was also targeted today in the Delhi High Court.If you read the court record, it becomes clear why I am being targeted and the threat that I pose to top level leadership at General Electric because of my having exposed corruption, fraud, bribery, forgery, illegal lobbying, tender manipulation, FCPA violations and obstruction of justice by General Electric executives and lawyers in connection with multi-billion USD Indian rail tenders, and specifically the project and tenders for the proposed diesel locomotive factory at Marhowra.Read also how General Electric has failed to respond to a Delhi High Court summons and someone has been used to file unauthorized & false affidavits without authority documents. This itself is a very grave obstruction of justice and corporate mis-governance charge and clearly implicates lawyers working for General Electric including Brackett Denniston, Alexander Dimitrief and Bradford Berenson.I request you to first read the following 4 court documents.I was threatened by Jeff Eglash a lawyer from General Electric in January 2011. I was threatened by an Indian lawyer Soli Sorabjee in March 2011 & told that if I pursued my complaints against General Electric, my health would be destroyed. Soli Sorabjee's daughter Zia Mody is purportedly General Electric's lawyer for my case.The threat to my life includes the threat to destroy my health, my organs and my body in order to incapacitate me.I have been drugged and poisoned since June 2010.My foot was deliberately dislocated in June 2014 by a doctor in an attempt to force me into surgery as part of attempts to eliminate me. I still have a dislocated ankle.An attempt was made to falsely diagnose me with thyroid cancer using doctors in August 2011 after I complained of poisoning. My medical records at the time indicated ethylene glycol poisoning. And there is much more.Evidence for all of the above is on the court record.I have also been targeted with nerve agents and organophosphates.I ask all of you to read the attached court documents, my blog at http://seemasapra.blogspot.com/ and my tweets at @SeemaSapraLawJeffrey Immelt wants me dead.I again request for witness protection from the United States government.The court record in the whistleblower corruption case against General Electric Company is attached.Seema SapraThe captioned matter Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 – in the matter of Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company and Others is now next listed before the Delhi High Court on 22 January 2014.The court record in this whistle-blower corruption petition can be read below.Pending applications in Writ Petition Civil No. 1280/2012
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Seema Sapra <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
AndAndTo all others,I have requested JudgeValmiki Mehta repeatedly this morning, that I be permitted to read the court order for yesterday's hearing before the hearing today at 3 30 pm. I have a right to read the order. It has not been uploaded on the Delhi High Court website and neither can I inspect the file as it is in court.Judge Valmiki Mehta has refused to allow me to read the order which also appears to have still not been signed.Judge Valmiki Mehta is obstructing my right to approach the Supreme Court of India against this order in a Special Leave Petition, again pointing towards judicial corruption. This is another reason why Judge Valmiki Mehta should not hear this matter.Seema Sapra
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Seema Sapra <email@example.com> wrote:
AndAndTo all others,Writ Petition Civil 1280/ 2012 was listed today in the Delhi High Court before Judge Valmiki Mehta and Judge P S Teji.
The Division Bench convened at 3 30 pm. I was told to argue but was not permitted to do so by Judge Valmiki Mehta who kept interrupting me, cutting me off and diverting the topic every time I tried to point out facts or submissions.Judge Valmiki Mehta kept repeating that the tenders I had impugned had been cancelled. He is not interested in deciding the matter on merits.I asked the Bench to take up CM 18969/ 2014 on the issue of impersonation of General Electric Company but this was not permitted. Judge Valmiki Mehta is preventing this application from being heard.At 4 30 pm, Judge Valmiki Mehta adjourned the matter to tomorrow at 3 30 pm and then attempted to pass an order misrepresenting that I had made my arguments. When I objected stating that I had not made my arguments he refused to dictate the order in court and insisted that he would dictate the order in his chambers.I point out that court orders are supposed to be passed in open court. Further I have a right to read the order before any further hearing in the matter tomorrow.I will be filing an SLP in the Supreme Court from today's order which has again permitted Manpreet Lamba to represent General Electric Company without a valid vakalatnama and which was passed without permitting me to argue.Seema Sapra
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Seema Sapra <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
AndAndTo all others,Writ Petition Civil 1280/ 2012 is listed tomorrow for hearing in the Delhi High Court before a Special Division Bench of Judge Valmiki Mehta and Judge P S Teji. I hope the lawyers for EMD, Siemens, Bombardier and Alstom will attend the hearing.I continue to be poisoned. Some poisonous gases/ fumes are being released into my apartment since around 7 am this morning and have been introduced at intervals through the day.If you read the court record, it becomes clear why I am being targeted and the threat that I pose to top level leadership at General Electric because of my having exposed corruption, fraud, bribery, forgery, illegal lobbying, tender manipulation, FCPA violations and obstruction of justice by General Electric executives and lawyers in connection with multi-billion USD Indian rail tenders, and specifically the project and tenders for the proposed diesel locomotive factory at Marhowra.Read also how General Electric has failed to respond to a Delhi High Court summons and someone has been used to file unauthorized & false affidavits without authority documents. This itself is a very grave obstruction of justice and corporate mis-governance charge and clearly implicates lawyers working for General Electric including Brackett Denniston, Alexander Dimitrief and Bradford Berenson.I request you to first read the following 4 court documents.I was threatened by Jeff Eglash a lawyer from GE in January 2011. I was threatened by an Indian lawyer Soli Sorabjee in March 2011 & told that if I pursued my complaints against GE, my health would be destroyed. Soli Sorabjee's daughter Zia Mody is purportedly GE's lawyer for my case.The threat to my life includes the threat to destroy my health, my organs and my body in order to incapacitate me.I have been drugged and poisoned since June 2010.My foot was deliberately dislocated in June 2014 by a doctor in an attempt to force me into surgery as part of attempts to eliminate me. I still have a dislocated ankle.An attempt was made to falsely diagnose me with thyroid cancer using doctors in August 2011 after I complained of poisoning. My medical records at the time indicated ethylene glycol poisoning. And there is much more.Evidence for all of the above is on the court record.I have also been targeted with nerve agents and organophosphates.I ask all of you to read the attached court documents, my blog at http://seemasapra.blogspot.com/ and my tweets at @SeemaSapraLawJeffrey Immelt wants me dead.I again request for witness protection from the United States government.The court record in the whistleblower corruption case against General Electric Company is attached.Seema SapraThe captioned matter Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 – in the matter of Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company and Others is next listed before the Delhi High Court on 19 January 2014.The court record in this whistle-blower corruption petition can be read below.Pending applications in Writ Petition Civil No. 1280/2012