-----Original Message-----
From: seema.sapra@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 07:59:01
To: Sapra<seemasapra@hotmail.com>; Seema Sapra<seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Reply-To: seema.sapra@gmail.com
Cc: Rajiv Khosla<advrajivkhosla@gmail.com>; Jatan Singh<jatan_singh@yahoo.com>; Abhijat Bal<abhijat.bal@gmail.com>; Ashutosh lohia<lasutosh@gmail.com>; Vikram Singh Panwar<vikrampanwar2010@gmail.com>; Anoop Bagai<anoopbagai@gmail.com>; <ashok.bhasin@yahoo.co.in>; Aruna Tiku<arunatikuadvocate@yahoo.com>; Sunil Mittal<sunilmittaladvocate@gmail.com>; Meghna Mittal Sankhla<meghna@sankhla.in>; <kadambari@ucolindia.com>; Amit Sharma with khosla<advocateas@gmail.com>; Laxmi Chauhan<laxmichauhanmalhan@gmail.com>; Pankaj Kapoor<lawyerpankaj@gmail.com>; rg.dhc@nic.in<rg.dhc@nic.in>; Bhim Sain Bassi<cp.bsbassi@nic.in>; sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in<sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in>; dcp-newdelhi-dl@nic.in<dcp-newdelhi-dl@nic.in>; dcp-central-dl@nic.in<dcp-central-dl@nic.in>; <director@aiims.ac.in>; <cp.ggn@hry.nic.in>; <jtcp.ggn@hry.nic.in>; <dcphq.ggn@hry.nic.in>; supremecourt@nic.in<supremecourt@nic.in>; <secy-mines@nic.in>; <cvo@airindia.in>; <sundari@airindia.in>; <Ashutosh.Dumbare@airindia.in>
Subject: Judges who cannot hear WP Civil 1280 of 2012 - Further Message dated 25 April 2014 to the CJI, the Supreme Court Secretary General and others from General Electric whistleblower Seema Sapra - Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012
25 April 2014
To
The Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India
The Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court
The Registrar General, Delhi High Court
The Chairman, Bar Council of Delhi
All other members of the Bar Council of Delhi
The Chairman and all members of the Bar Council of India
The Delhi Police Commissioner
The Registrar Vigilance, Delhi High Court
Ref: Whistle-blower corruption and right to life Writ Petition pending in the Delhi High Court since February 2012 - Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 - in the matter of Seema Sapra versus General Electric Company & Others
The reasons why the following judges cannot hear WP Civil 1280 of 2012, OMP 647 of 2012, and Criminal Contempt Case 3 of 2012 are listed below;
Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed - recused - brother Dr Parvez Ahmed involved in my complaints against Max Hospitals
Justice Pradeep Nandrajog - recused
Justice Gita Mittal- recused - was attempting to sabotage writ petition and was targeting me
Justice Ravindra Bhat - recused
Justice P K Bhasin - recused
Justice Manmohan - recused
Justice Hima Kohli - recused
Justice Mukta Gupta - complaint against her of attempt to sabotage Writ Petition at inception in February 2012
Justice Indermeet Kaur - recused
Justice Rajiv Shakdher - recused
Justice Manmohan Singh - recused
Justice Veena Birbal - recused
Justice R V Easwar - recused
Justice Suresh Kait - recused
Justice V K Jain - my complaint that sexual harassment complaint against him by intern was covered up
Justice V P Vaish - involved in matter as Registrar General, some questionable actions as RG
Justice Sunita Gupta - recused
Justicec Reva Khetrapal - recused
Justice Vipin Sanghi - request for not before when petition filed - because of his connection to Anupam Sanghi
Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw - recused
Justice Kailash Gambhir - recused
Justice Pratibha Rani - recused
Justice Sudershan Kumar Misra - recused
Justice J R Midha - complaint about judicial corruption by his Division Bench with Justice Gita Mittal
Justice Deepa Sharma - recused - complaint about judicial corruption by her Division Bench with Justice Gita Mittal
Justice Muralidhar - complaint against him of judicial corruption and attempt to sabotage writ petition
Justice Najmi Waziri - appeared in matter as counsel
Justice Sanjiv Khanna - recused
Justice Sunil Gaur - recused
Justice V Kameswar Rao - objection because of his close ties to Justice A K Sikri - involved in targeting me as a lawyer
Justice A K Pathak - objection because of his connection to Justice Indermeet Kaur - J. Indermeet Kaur was inciting her husband J. Pathak against me during the farewell tea for J. Ramana
Justice Jayant Nath - had requested his support when he was lawyer and distributed material to him
Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva - had requested his support when he was lawyer and distributed material to him - he had refused support stating he was in line for elevation as judge
Justice Siddhartha Mridul - has repeatedly targeted me sitting with J. Sanjiv Khanna, J. P K Bhasin and J. Badar Durrez Ahmed - attempt to cover up the fact that I had been poisoned
Justice V K Shali - objection because of his family ties to Mrs Rita Kaul
Justice G S Sistani - objection because of close ties to A S Chandhiok, was my father's lawyer in 1989 and badly let down my father by colluding with other side
Justice Valmiki J Mehta - targeted me when this matter was listed before him because J. P K Bhasin was on leave - heard tender matter sitting singly in violation of rules
Justice S P Garg - recused
Seema Sapra
25 April 2014
To
The Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India
The Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court
The Registrar General, Delhi High Court
The Chairman, Bar Council of Delhi
All other members of the Bar Council of Delhi
The Chairman and all members of the Bar Council of India
The Delhi Police Commissioner
The Registrar Vigilance, Delhi High Court
Ref: Whistle-blower corruption and right to life Writ Petition pending in the Delhi High Court since February 2012 - Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 - in the matter of Seema Sapra versus General Electric Company & Others
I am an advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi since 1995.
I have filed the captioned corruption petition producing complaints and evidence of corruption, fraud, forgery, bribery and other illegal practices committed by General Electric Company, its subsidiaries, its employees and agents in connection with two Railway Ministry tenders for Projects to set up diesel and electric locomotive factories at Marhowra and Madhepura respectively. These two Projects with long term purchase and service contracts are together worth over Rs 127,000 crores to the selected bidder. Not only are these Projects against the national and public interest but as described by me in the writ petition these tenders are tainted with corruption, illegal lobbying, fraud, forgery, and bribery with high level Government of India functionaries including Montek Singh Ahluwalia conspiring with General Electric to create and award these lucrative tenders to General Electric.
I had in an earlier email dated 18 March 2014, brought to your attention the names of Judges of the Delhi High Court who cannot hear this and two other connected matters (i.e., OMP 647 of 2012 and Criminal Contempt Case 3 of 2012).
On 24 March 2014, Judge Sudershan Kumar Misra and Judge S P Garg passed an order stating that they would not hear WP Civil 1280 of 2012 and directing that this matter be listed before another Bench on 29 April 2014 subject to orders of the Chief Justice.
I bring to your attention that the following Judges of the Delhi High Court cannot hear Writ Petition Civil 1280 of 2012, and the connected matters OMP 647 of 2012 and Criminal Contempt Case 3 of 2012
Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed
Justice Pradeep Nandrajog
Justice Gita Mittal
Justice Ravindra Bhat
Justice P K Bhasin
Justice Manmohan
Justice Hima Kohli
Justice Mukta Gupta
Justice Indermeet
Justice Rajiv Shakdher
Justice Manmohan Singh
Justice Veena Birbal
Justice R V Easwar
Justice Suresh Kait
Justice V K Jain
Justice V P Vaish
Justice Sunita Gupta
Justicec Reva Khetrapal
Justice Vipin Sanghi
Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
Justice Kailash Gambhir
Justice Pratibha Rani
Justice Sudershan Kumar Misra
Justice J R Midha
Justice Deepa Sharma
Justice Muralidhar
Justice Najmi Waziri
Justice Sanjiv Khanna
Justice Kailash Gambhir
Justice Sunil Gaur
Justice V Kameswar Rao
Justice A K Pathak
Justice Jayant Nath
Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva
Justice Siddhartha Mridul
Justice V K Shali
Justice G S Sistani
Justice Valmiki J Mehta
Justice S P Garg
The two judges who are left out of the above list are:
Justice Gorla Rohini
Justice G P Mittal
I have been poisoned since 2010 and continue to be poisoned. I fear for my life and will be murdered unless these matters are taken up expeditiously and unless I am protected.
I reproduce below the order passed in WP Civil 1280 of 2014 on 23 April 2014 by Justice S K Misra and Justice S P Garg:
"Today the petitioner, who appears in person, states as follows:
"I have claimed a grave threat to my life from the State including the police. I have informed this Court in writing that since January 2014. I have been sleeping in my car outside Gate No.8 of the Delhi High Court. I have also been informing this Court in writing and through affidavits filed in this matter that the police has failed to comply with the protection orders issued by this Court; and that I am not only being harassed and targeted with police complicity during the night but I am also being poisoned by deliberate exposure to toxic chemical, including nerve agents and organophosphates, during the night. I fear for my life. I have been waking up breathless during the night on account of such poisoning, and I apprehend that if this continues, it will result in cessation of breathing and will cause death; and I further apprehend that the police will then be used to cover up such murder. I have been making police complaints about these incidents since January 2014 in writing but the police has failed to even respond to these complaints. In view of this, I am making an oral request to this Hon?ble Court that it issue the directions to the Registrar General of this Court; to the Delhi Police Commissioner; and to the local SHO; to ensure that the CCTV security camera recordings maintained both by the Court and by the police in the area where I am parking my car at night and along the roads leading to that spot; be preserved, because this will be valuable evidence in support of my complaints to the police. I have been informed by the Delhi Police security that such recordings are normally preserved only for a month.
I am, therefore, seeking directions from this Court that these recordings be preserved for longer than that until my complaints are addressed and investigated. I am also submitting that such an order will also result in providing me some measure of protection because those harming me, including the police, will get the message that the evidence of what is going on around my car during the night is being preserved pursuant to the directions of this Court. This is my request orally.
Further, I have also requested the Hon'ble Court to direct the Registrar General to preserve CCTV footage from the three court lobbies today because I noticed that a policeman was instructing two other policemen to target me; and CCTV footage might provide evidence of contact between the General Electric lawyers and those policemen. Further, one Sub Inspector Umed Singh from Police Station Nizamuddin, who is present in Court, was also seen by me speaking with General Electric lawyers outside the Court."
We have recorded the above verbatim so that there may be no doubt about the submissions of the petitioner, who also happens to be a qualified and practicing Advocate registered at the Bar.
This matter has been pending for some time. There is extensive controversy raised by the petitioner on almost every aspect of the matter. Apparently, she is also making serious allegations against the respondents including the Police Authorities to the extent of alleging a deliberate intent to murder her in a premeditated conspiracy.
Under the circumstances, it is open to the petitioner to file an appropriate application seeking specific reliefs so that an appropriate response can also be obtained from the concerned respondents on every allegation made by the petitioner. As and when such an application is moved, the same shall be duly considered by this Court.
We have now invited the petitioner to continue where she left off on the previous date of hearing.
We have heard the petitioner from 3:50 PM to 5:31 PM.
Re-notify on 24.04.2014 at 3:30 PM."
On 24 April 2014, Justice S K Misra and Justice S P Garg recused from hearing WP Civil 1280 of 2012 without indicating any reason.
I repeat my request that these matters be brought to the attention of the Chief Justice of India with a request that the Chief Justice of India transfer these matters to the Supreme Court of India for hearing. I repeat and reiterate the contents of my letter addressed to the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court dated 10 January 2014.
On several earlier occasions, registry officials including listing Registrar Lorren Bamniyal have in corrupt collusion with lawyers representing General Electric (without proper authority documents), conspired to mislead the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court and have got this matter listed before Benches which are disqualified from hearing this matter. For instance, in March 2014, this matter was listed before a Bench comprising of Justice Najmi Waziri who earlier appeared in this matter as counsel for the Delhi Police Commissioner.
I am therefore writing to you to bring to your attention that the only judges of this Court who are not disqualified from hearing this matter are Justice Gorla Rohini and Justice G P Mittal. I may add that I am at present not aware of any reason disqualifying them.
Seema Sapra
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
No comments:
Post a Comment