Sunday, 27 April 2014

How do the US DOJ and UK SFO investigations of Alstom and General Electric's attempted takeover of Alstom impact the Indian Railway's open 2013 tender for the proposed electric locomotive factory at Madhepura where the bidders include Siemens, Alstom, Bombardier and General Electric

Read the The Financial Times report at http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/3360c854-cc89-11e3-9b5f-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3005V4l2S


April 25, 2014 5:39 pm

UK SFO investigators questioned Alstom executives

Officials from the UK’s Serious Fraud Office travelled to Paris this month to question senior executives of Alstom as part of a corruption investigation into the French conglomerate that is in bid talks with General Electric of the US.
The SFO conducted its interviews this month with the assistance of an investigating magistrate in France, said people familiar with the investigation.

The SFO’s five-year probe – which could result in criminal charges in the near future – is only one of many worldwide of Alstom as prosecutors, including those in the US and Brazil, among others, inquire whether the company bribed officials to secure lucrative contracts in countries from India to Poland to Indonesia.
Uncertainty about the outcome of these investigations could weigh on any bid offered by General Electric or any white knight promoted by the French government.
The biggest outstanding risk lies with the US Department of Justice, investigating whether the company breached the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits payments to any foreign government official in an attempt to win or retain business. The highest FCPA fine was $800m paid by Siemens in 2008.
The DoJ charged four current and former Alstom executives in 2013, alleging that they had bribed Indonesian officials to win power contracts. Two have pleaded guilty, and a third faces a jury trial in June.
By so-called successor liability laws in the US, a new owner of a company must abide by any admissions or agreements made by a legacy component.
Alstom has said it is co-operating with the DoJ, and as settlement talks have not started it would be “sheer speculation” to put a figure on a potential fine.
The uncertainty of the outcome of the DoJ’s probe “means GE will get Alstom cheap,” one lawyer said. “It’s just such a huge risk that will have to be factored into the price.”
The SFO’s investigation is more advanced and may finally be reaching a conclusion just as the company has become the subject of fevered rumours of a €10bn bid by GE.
The SFO, probing allegations of bribery, false accounting and money-laundering, has sent its file to the UK attorney-general, Dominic Grieve, said people familiar with the investigation.
This indicates the SFO wants to file criminal charges against the company under the UK’s antiquated bribery laws – which were overhauled in 2011 – as the attorney-general must approve SFO charges relating to overseas corruption as a first step.
The move comes three years after an unsuccessful legal challenge brought by two UK-based Alstom executives – a third suspect died – effectively froze the SFO’s probe. The agency subsequently dropped its investigation into the two executives because of lack of evidence but carried on investigating the company.
The decision from the executives’ judicial review revealed that the SFO suspects that a UK Alstom unit, Network UK, was a “cell” used to pay €90m to “companies suspected of having acted as consultants” to conceal “the payment of bribes to secure the award of state contracts in power, transport and other markets around the world”.
Indian investigators were alerted by the SFO in February to separate allegations that the company paid £3m of bribes to secure a Delhi Metro contract, according to press reports in India.
Ultimate sanctions emanating from the SFO’s investigation could include a fine – corporate criminal penalties in the UK are typically in the tens of millions of pounds, although there are plans to make them more severe – against the company, if it still exists.
Successor liability laws are not as well developed in the UK, and legal experts expressed doubt whether it would be possible to file charges against a corporate entity that no longer exists.
Alstom said it was co-operating with the SFO investigation and declined to comment further. The SFO declined to comment.
Additional reporting by Michael Stothard in Paris


No comments:

Post a Comment