-----Original Message-----
From: <seemasapra@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:49:23
To: Seema Sapra<seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Reply-To: seemasapra@hotmail.com
Cc: Seema<seema.sapra@gmail.com>; Rajiv Khosla<advrajivkhosla@gmail.com>; Jatan Singh<jatan_singh@yahoo.com>; Abhijat Bal<abhijat.bal@gmail.com>; Ashutosh lohia<lasutosh@gmail.com>; Vikram Singh Panwar<vikrampanwar2010@gmail.com>; Anoop Bagai<anoopbagai@gmail.com>; <ashok.bhasin@yahoo.co.in>; Aruna Tiku<arunatikuadvocate@yahoo.com>; Sunil Mittal<sunilmittaladvocate@gmail.com>; Meghna Mittal Sankhla<meghna@sankhla.in>; <kadambari@ucolindia.com>; Amit Sharma with khosla<advocateas@gmail.com>; Laxmi Chauhan<laxmichauhanmalhan@gmail.com>; Pankaj Kapoor<lawyerpankaj@gmail.com>; rg.dhc@nic.in<rg.dhc@nic.in>; Bhim Sain Bassi<cp.bsbassi@nic.in>; sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in<sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in>; dcp-newdelhi-dl@nic.in<dcp-newdelhi-dl@nic.in>; dcp-central-dl@nic.in<dcp-central-dl@nic.in>; <director@aiims.ac.in>; <cp.ggn@hry.nic.in>; <jtcp.ggn@hry.nic.in>; <dcphq.ggn@hry.nic.in>; supremecourt@nic.in<supremecourt@nic.in>; <secy-mines@nic.in>; <cvo@airindia.in>; <sundari@airindia.in>; <Ashutosh.Dumbare@airindia.in>
Subject: Justice Shali - from General Electric whistleblower Seema Sapra - Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 - in the matter of Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company
After sending the following message on email, I asked Justice Shali at 2:30 when the Special DB would sit. His reply was shocking. He told me it would sit at 4:30. Court rises at 4:30. What hearing will this Bench provide if it sits at 4:30 pm?
This is exactly the tactic used earlier by the Division Bench of Judges S K Misra and Suresh Kait.
It is for the judges to handle their board in a manner that the Special DB matter can be heard and there is sufficient time allocated to the matter.
I apprehend Judges Shali and G P Mittal will also try to prevent this matter from being heard by posting it to a Friday.
Earlier Justice Nandrajog had acting in capacity of Acting CJ posted this matter on a tuesday in March 2014 after noting that it would never get heard on a friday.
Seema Sapra
"The fraudulent and unauthorized OMP 647 of 2012 purporting to have been filed on behalf of GE India as part of the conspiracy to subvert the administration of justice in my whistle-blower corruption writ petition against General Electric Company was listed today before Delhi High Court Judge Vipin Sanghi. I informed the Judge that he ought not to hear this matter because there were existing registry directions in WP Civil 1280 of 2012 (a connected matter) that that matter not be placed before Judge Vipin Sanghi as his relative, a lawyer called Anupam Sanghi has issued threats in 2011 to me on instructions from GE lawyers including telling me that if I approached a court with my complaints against General Electric, then I would find that "judges were harassing me".
I find it surprising that despite my communications to the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court and the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court setting out the objection to these connected matters being listed before
Justice Vipin Sanghi, OMP 647 of 2012 was again listed before J. Vipin Sanghi.
I pointed out the above to Justice Vipin Sanghi and he has directed OMP 647 of 2012 to be placed before a different Bench on 12 May 2012.
I also point out that WP Civil 1280 of 2012 is listed in the Delhi High Court before a Division Bench of Justice Shali and Justice G P Mittal.
I also find it surprising that despite my communications to the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court and the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court setting out the objection to these connected matters being listed before Justice Shali, WP 1280 of 2012 has been listed before a Division Bench comprising of J. Shali.
I have earlier made complaints about how Ms Rita Kaul was targeting me on the instructions of Mr A S Chandhiok, how she attempted to fraudulently obtain my signatures on a piece of paper, and how she told me that if I authorised her in writing, she could speak to Justice Gita Mittal "for me" before whom WP Civil 1280 of 2012 was then listed. This "offer" was entirely unsolicited from my side.
Rita Kaul has close family ties to Justice Shali and I had overheard her tell someone in the ladies bar room, that her daughter was married into Justice Shali's family. She added that her daughter was married to the son of Justice Shali's real brother.
Given Rita Kaul's past conduct concerning WP Civil 1280 of 2012 and my complaints against Rita Kaul, which are on the court record of WP Civil 1280 of 2012, it will not be appropriate for Justice Shali to hear this matter given his close family ties to Rita Kaul.
Further, It has come to my notice that Justice Shali's spouse and child both hold shares of BHEL. BHEL is a party in WP Civil 1280 of 2012 and its financial outlook and share price is liable to be affected by the final decision in WP Civil 1280 of 2012. This is an additional reason why Justice Shali cannot hear WP Civil 1280 of 2012.
Justice Shali's wife works as an officer in an Indian Navratna PSU. Does she work in BHEL? And does she have dealings with BHEL officers who might be implicated in the corruption complaints which are the subject matter of WP Civil 1280 of 2012?
I will be seeking recusal by Justice Shali for the aforementioned reasons.
I also point out that Dilip Namrani the present court master in Justice Shali's court was earlier a dealing assistant handling the court files of WP Civil 1280 of 2012. At that time he had corruptly tampered with the court record, deliberately destroyed and damaged parts of the court record, and secreted certain documents filed by parties from the court record, and added unfiled documents to the court record without authority until I had complained about all of this to the Court in writing. The court record of WP Civil 1280 of 2012 was taken away from Dilip Namrani after my complaints. However instead of a vigilance inquiry being initiated against him, he was promoted to a court master post as a reward for his corrupt deeds by then Registrar General V P Vaish.
Today I was shocked to find that Dilip Namrani was again handling the court record in WP Civil 1280 of 2012 as court master in Justice Shali's court. When I informed Dilip Namrani before 10:30 am today that I had an objection to his handling the court record in WP Civil 1280 of 2012 and would inform the court about it, Dilip Namrani got aggressive and defensive and stated the following: that I was also making complaints even against the Chief Justice; and that this was my "aadat".
I refused to respond to Dilip Namrani and informed him that I would be recording what he had stated in my further complaints against him.
There is clear documentary evidence that in 2012 Dilip Namrani corruptly tampered with the court record of WP Civil 1280 of 2012.
Plus Dilip Namrani's statements to me in court 22 today show that he acted and continues to act with impunity and because he believes he enjoys the protection of senior registry officials who were part of the conspiracy to tamper with the court record, Dilip Namrani displayed belligerence by his statements to me.
I request that Dilip Namrani not be permitted to touch the Court record in WP Civil 1280 of 2012 or to handle this matter in any capacity.
I also seek the initiation of Delhi High Court vigilance proceedings against Dilip Namrani and the registration of an FIR against him for tampering with, damaging and falsifying a court record.
Seema Sapra"
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
No comments:
Post a Comment