Fwd: Message to Rohit Meena, DCP South West Delhi Police from Seema Sapra GE Aerospace whistleblower

Rohit Meena, you have been directed by the Delhi High Court to protect me. You have not complied. This Court order is binding on you. Even if Narendra Modi, Amit Shah, Chandrachud, the US Embassy, the Commissioner of Police or even the Judges who issued the order tell you not to comply with this order, you still have to comply.

Seema Sapra

On Thu, 29 Aug, 2024, 17:28 Seema Sapra, <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:

Writ Petition Civil 11164/2024 (Seema Sapra versus Usha Rangnani IPS AGMUT 2011 & Others), Writ Petition Civil 11165/2024 (Seema Sapra versus Alphabet Inc & Others), and Writ Petition Civil 11618/2024 (Seema Sapra versus Amit Kaushik DANIPS 2010 & Others) were listed for hearing in the Delhi High Court on 28 August 2024. I appeared.

The following orders have been passed.

Writ Petition Civil 11164/2024 (Seema Sapra versus Usha Rangnani IPS AGMUT 2011 & Others)

$~59

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 11164/2024

SEEMA SAPRA .....Petitioner

Through: Petitioner in person.

versus

USHA RANGNANI IPS AGMUT 2011 AND OTHERS

.....Respondents

Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

O R D E R

% 28.08.2024

1. Ms. Sapra vehemently submits that the protection order passed by this

Court on 01.06.2023 in W.P. (Crl.) No. 437/2018, wherein the Court after

recording her submissions that she was facing threat to her life, had directed

the DCP (South-West) to look into the matter and provide all possible

protection to her in accordance with law, is still not being implemented.

2. If that be the position, the DCP (South-West) will look into the matter

and ensure that the order passed by this Court on 01.06.2023 in W.P. (Crl.)

No. 437/2018 is strictly complied with.

3. List along with W.P.(C) No. 11618/2024 on 10.09.2024 at 2:30 pm.

4. A copy of this order be forwarded to DCP (South-West) for necessary

information and compliance.

REKHA PALLI, J

SHALINDER KAUR, J

AUGUST 28, 2024/ss

Writ Petition Civil 11165/2024 (Seema Sapra versus Alphabet Inc & Others)

$~60

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 11165/2024

SEEMA SAPRA .....Petitioner

Through: Petitioner in person.

versus

ALPHABET INC AND OTHERS .....Respondents

Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

O R D E R

% 28.08.2024

1. After some arguments, the petitioner, who appears in person, prays

that hearing be deferred to enable her to move an appropriate

application with a prayer for summoning of the record in W.P.(CRL)

437/2018.

2. At request, list at 2:30 pm on 23.10.2024.

REKHA PALLI, J

SHALINDER KAUR, J

AUGUST 28, 2024

kk

Writ Petition Civil 11618/2024 (Seema Sapra versus Amit Kaushik DANIPS 2010 & Others)

$~61

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 11618/2024

SEEMA SAPRA .....Petitioner

Through: Petitioner in person.

versus

AMIT KAUSHIK DANIPS 2010 AND OTHERS .....Respondents

Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

O R D E R

% 28.08.2024

1. Since the present petition primarily raises grievances regarding an

affidavit filed in W.P.(C) No. 13604/2023, which it is claimed by the

petitioner is forged, we are of the view that it would be appropriate that the

present petition is taken up with W.P.(C) No. 13604/2023, which is listed on

10.09.2024 before this Bench itself.

2. List along with W.P.(C) No. 13604/2023 at 02:30 PM on 10.09.2024.

REKHA PALLI, J

SHALINDER KAUR, J

AUGUST 28, 2024/ss

Copies of these writ petitions are attached. The relief sought in these three petitions is reproduced below.

Meanwhile I have been continuously poisoned in my rented premises in Rajokri since the evening of 28 August 2024. Attempts to murder me are on.

I have forwarded a copy of the Order dated 28 August 2024 passed in WP Civil 11164/2024 to the DCP South West who is presently Rohit Meena. I have received no reply to this email sent to him.

From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>

Date: Wed, 28 Aug, 2024, 21:59

Subject: Delhi High Court Order dated 28 August 2024 passed in WPC11618/2024

To: <dcp-southwest-dl@nic.in>, <cp.sanjayarora@delhipolice.gov.in>

To DCP South West Rohit Meena,

Attached is a copy of Order dated 28 August 2024 passed in WPC11618/2024.

I would like to meet you tomorrow to discuss compliance with this court order and to show you why and how Order dated 1 June 2024 has not been complied with. I would also like to discuss the reasons and evidence for the threat to my life.

I would also like to discuss with you and explain how I am being targeted and poisoned, including in my Rajokri premises.

Please reply to me on email.

Seema Sapra

Advocate

Seema Sapra

Relief sought in WP Civil 11164/2024

(i)              Direct the constitution of a CBI Special Investigative Team headed by a Senior Officer (and by someone who has not been used to target the Petitioner in the past) to conduct a court monitored investigation into the role of Usha Rangnani IPS AGMUT 2011, presently DCP IGIA, in obstructing the protection order passed by the Delhi High Court on 1 June 2023 in WP Crl 437/2018 and into her role in facilitating the ongoing poisoning of the Petitioner which has continued even after the Court protection order of 1 June 2023 passed in WP Crl 437/ 2018, and into the creation and use of the memo sent to the Petitioner on 7 August 2024 (from the email  dcp.igia@delhipolice.gov.in) in targeting the Petitioner and in the criminal conspiracy and multiple attempts to murder the Petitioner by poisoning in her rented premises in Rajokri;

(ii)           Direct the Commissioner of Police and the Ministry of Home Affairs to immediately provide full protection to the Petitioner so as to ensure that the Petitioner is not harmed in any manner including by Policemen;

(iii)         Enforce the Petitioner's fundamental right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India by directing the Government of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs to immediately provide Z+ security to the Petitioner;

(iv)          To pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

Relief sought in WP Civil 11165/2024

(i)              Direct the registration of an FIR against lawyers Hemant Singh BCD Enrolment No. D/107/1982, Mamta Rani Jha BCD Enrolment No. D/3007/1999, Shruttima Ehersa BCD Enrollment No. D/364/2017, and other unknown co-conspirators for forgery of the document annexed to this Writ Petition at Annexure A-2 which was filed by lawyer Mamta Rani Jha Advocate BCD Enrolment No. D/3007/1999 in Delhi High Court WP Crl 437/ 2018 on 10 May 2019 under diary number 431938/2019 and which has been falsely described as Certificate of Ms. Lily Kley under section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 filed on behalf of Google LLC;

(ii)           Direct the registration of an FIR against lawyers Hemant Singh BCD Enrolment No. D/107/1982, Mamta Rani Jha BCD Enrolment No. D/3007/1999, Shruttima Ehersa BCD Enrollment No. D/364/2017, and other unknown co-conspirators for fabrication of evidence in respect of the document annexed to this Writ Petition at Annexure A-2 which was filed by lawyer Mamta Rani Jha Advocate BCD Enrolment No. D/3007/1999 in Delhi High Court WP Crl 437/ 2018 on 10 May 2019 under diary number 431938/2019 and which has been falsely described as Certificate of Ms. Lily Kley under section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 filed on behalf of Google LLC;

(iii)         Direct the registration of an FIR against lawyers Hemant Singh BCD Enrolment No. D/107/1982, Mamta Rani Jha BCD Enrolment No. D/3007/1999, Shruttima Ehersa BCD Enrollment No. D/364/2017, and other unknown co-conspirators for filing a forged document in Delhi High Court WP Crl 437/ 2018 falsely described as Certificate of Ms. Lily Kley under section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 filed on behalf of Google LLC for Offences committed and attracting the following provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita - 463 IPC Forgery, 464 IPC Making a false document, 465 IPC Punishment for forgery, 466 IPC Forgery of document used in Court proceedings, 470 IPC Forged document, 471 IPC Using as genuine a forged document, 191 IPC Giving false evidence, 192 IPC Fabricating false evidence, 193 IPC Punishment for false evidence in a judicial proceeding, 196 IPC Using evidence known to be false, 197 IPC Issuing or signing false certificate, 198 IPC Using as true a certificate known to be false, 199 IPC False statement made in declaration which is by law receivable as evidence, 200 IPC Using as true such declaration knowing it to be false, 201 IPC Causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen offender, 202 IPC Intentional omission to give information of offence by person bound to inform, 203 IPC Giving false information respecting an offence committed, 204 IPC Secretion or Destruction of document to prevent its production as evidence, 335 BNS Making a false document, 336 BNS. Forgery for Making a false document with intent to cause damage or injury, to the public or to any person or with intent to commit fraud, 337 BNS forgery for misuse in judicial proceedings, 339 BNS Knowingly possessing forged document and intending its fraudulent use as genuine, 340 BNS dishonest use as genuine of forged document, 227 BNS Giving false evidence, 228 BNS Fabricating false evidence, 229 BNS Giving false evidence and fabricating false evidence for use in judicial proceeding and intentionally giving false evidence and intentionally fabricating false evidence, 233 BNS corruptly using as genuine evidence known to be false or fabricated, 234 BNS Issuing or signing false certificate to be used as evidence, 235 BNS Giving false evidence by corrupt use of false certificate as true certificate, 236 BNS Giving false evidence by making false declaration, 237 BNS Giving false evidence by corrupting using false declaration as true, 238 BNS Causing evidence of offence to disappear and giving false information concerning offence with intent to screen offender, 239 BNS Intentionally omitting to give information concerning offence despite being legally bound to do so, 240 BNS Giving false information respecting an offence known to have been committed, 241 BNS Secreting or destroying evidence to prevent its production as evidence;

(iv)          Direct the Commissioner of Police and the Ministry of Home Affairs to immediately provide full protection to the Petitioner so as to ensure that the Petitioner is not harmed in any manner including by Policemen;

(v)            Enforce the Petitioner's fundamental right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India by directing the Government of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs to immediately provide Z+ security to the Petitioner;

(vi)          To pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

Relief sought in WP Civil 11618/2024

(i)              Direct the registration of an FIR against lawyers Mehak Nakra Advocate BCD enrolment no. D/1729/2012, Anand Khatri Advocate, Sanjay Lao Advocate BCD Enrolment No. D/362/1994, Santosh Kumar Tripathi Advocate, Debajyoti Behuria Advocate and Notary, Police Officers DCP Manoj C., Inspector Sahdev Kumar Rana SHO Vasant Kunj South, Sub Inspector Chetan Rana, Sub Inspector Ram Prasad Meena, and other unknown co-conspirators for forgery of the document filed as affidavit of DCP Amit Kaushik on 20 July 2024 in Delhi High Court Writ Petition Civil 13604/2023 and for filing of a forged affidavit and for fabrication of evidence;

(ii)           Direct the registration of an FIR against lawyers Mehak Nakra Advocate BCD enrolment no. D/1729/2012, Anand Khatri Advocate, Sanjay Lao Advocate BCD Enrolment No. D/362/1994, Santosh Kumar Tripathi Advocate, Debajyoti Behuria Advocate and Notary, Police Officers DCP Manoj C., Inspector Sahdev Kumar Rana SHO Vasant Kunj South, Sub Inspector Chetan Rana, Sub Inspector Ram Prasad Meena, and other unknown co-conspirators for filing a forged document in Delhi High Court WP Civil 13604/2023 falsely described as affidavit of Amit Kaushik DCP Special Cell SR for Offences committed and attracting the following provisions of the Indian Penal Code and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita - 463 IPC Forgery, 464 IPC Making a false document, 465 IPC Punishment for forgery, 466 IPC Forgery of document used in Court proceedings, 470 IPC Forged document, 471 IPC Using as genuine a forged document, 191 IPC Giving false evidence, 192 IPC Fabricating false evidence, 193 IPC Punishment for false evidence in a judicial proceeding, 196 IPC Using evidence known to be false, 197 IPC Issuing or signing false certificate, 198 IPC Using as true a certificate known to be false, 199 IPC False statement made in declaration which is by law receivable as evidence, 200 IPC Using as true such declaration knowing it to be false, 201 IPC Causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen offender, 202 IPC Intentional omission to give information of offence by person bound to inform, 203 IPC Giving false information respecting an offence committed, 204 IPC Secretion or Destruction of document to prevent its production as evidence, 335 BNS Making a false document, 336 BNS. Forgery for Making a false document with intent to cause damage or injury, to the public or to any person or with intent to commit fraud, 337 BNS forgery for misuse in judicial proceedings, 339 BNS Knowingly possessing forged document and intending its fraudulent use as genuine, 340 BNS dishonest use as genuine of forged document, 227 BNS Giving false evidence, 228 BNS Fabricating false evidence, 229 BNS Giving false evidence and fabricating false evidence for use in judicial proceeding and intentionally giving false evidence and intentionally fabricating false evidence, 233 BNS corruptly using as genuine evidence known to be false or fabricated, 234 BNS Issuing or signing false certificate to be used as evidence, 235 BNS Giving false evidence by corrupt use of false certificate as true certificate, 236 BNS Giving false evidence by making false declaration, 237 BNS Giving false evidence by corrupting using false declaration as true, 238 BNS Causing evidence of offence to disappear and giving false information concerning offence with intent to screen offender, 239 BNS Intentionally omitting to give information concerning offence despite being legally bound to do so, 240 BNS Giving false information respecting an offence known to have been committed, 241 BNS Secreting or destroying evidence to prevent its production as evidence;

(iii)         Direct the Commissioner of Police and the Ministry of Home Affairs to immediately provide full protection to the Petitioner so as to ensure that the Petitioner is not harmed in any manner including by Policemen;

(iv)          Enforce the Petitioner's fundamental right to life guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India by directing the Government of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs to immediately provide Z+ security to the Petitioner;

(v)            To pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

Seema Sapra - General Electric corruption whistle-blower: the Truth prevails

Pages

Saturday 7 September 2024

Fwd: Message to Rohit Meena, DCP South West Delhi Police from Seema Sapra GE Aerospace whistleblower

No comments:

Post a Comment

My Blog List