The night before last night, one of the dogs (he is named Tiger Baby) I feed at the Delhi High court and who I have adopted was deliberately trapped by some men inside the Delhi High Court near gate 8. He was being beaten and terrorized after I got to the High Court. The intent was to target me, I heard glass bottles being thrown at him. When I saw him later, he had some problem with his eyes. Last night the same thing happened. The same dog was deliberately trapped in the same place and after I reached there some men started to beat and torture the dog. Attempts were made to kill this dog in front of me with a large stone. I managed to click pictures of one of the men involved.
This dog usually waits for me outside gate 8. Last night when he managed to come to me, he was heavily traumatized, in pain and something was terribly wrong with his eyes. He can see alright though. After a few minutes, one of the caretakers of the Delhi High Court came and fed this dog something. This dog is friendly with both the caretakers of the Delhi High Court and plays with them. But one of them has been used to target this dog in the past in order to target me.
This is the same dog who was deliberately hurt by a CRPF man outside gate 7 in my presence with a projectile from a slingshot on 26 December 2018. His eye was hurt but it healed fully. Then he was again beaten inside the Delhi High Court on 7/8 March and his front right leg was hurt. This was a direct retaliation against me for complaining to the Supreme Court that I was beaten by two policemen outside the Delhi High Court in the early morning of 1 March. His leg was also healing and until two days ago, he was very happy and playful.
Now again with my cases being listed in the Supreme Court on 11 April 2019, he has been targeted, beaten and traumatized only in order to target me. He is one of my adopted dogs. I have been repeatedly threatened over the last two years that the dogs I feed and look after at the Delhi High Court will be harmed and killed. And now just a week before my cases are listed in the Supreme Court he is again being beaten, tortured and traumatized.
This is completely despicable and unacceptable. Innocent animals are being targeted in order to target me. As I have said before, I will never forgive or forget this.
Pictures of the man who was trying to kill this dog last night and of two policemen who appear to have been involved in this criminal conspiracy are attached. The dog was terrified and hiding from this man. The man was trying to kill this dog.
CCTV records need to be preserved both by the Delhi High Court and Delhi Police. I will make sure these acts of animal cruelty are punished.
I take care of these dogs. And these dogs are being targeted only because of this. This is despicable. But be sure, I will continue with my cases against GE, Raian Karanjawala and Soli Sorabjee irrespective. It is despicable that these dogs are being threatened, beaten, tortured and inflicted with pain only in order to target me. Remember very well, I will never forgive or forget this. And irrespective of what you may do to these dogs, I will survive and I will continue with my cases. I never accept being threatened or intimidated. I am going to come after you.
I will be mentioning all of this before the Supreme Court on 11 April 2019. And I will be asking for protection orders for me and these dogs.
I am also asking the Police Commissioner and DCP Madhur Verma to ensure that neither I nor the dogs I have adopted are harmed or killed. Give us protection in terms of the Supreme Court order of 1 March 2019.
Later, CRPF men in a Police vehicle with licence number JH01AE2245 attempted to run over me and the dogs outside gate 8 of the Delhi High Court. This SUV then entered the Delhi High Court. CCTV records must be preserved.
So this place I am staying at, the staff is now being used to target me very openly. I am already being poisoned here and my room has been rigged to poison me with chemical agents. Pesticides, anesthetic agents and even nitrous oxide is being released into my room here. This was also done today.
My cases were last listed in the Supreme Court on 29 March. On 23 March, the Saturday before that, the only day I actually get to spend in my room, two men landed up outside my room without warning to service the ACs there. I requested a staff member that the ACs be serviced during the weekday Monday to Friday when I am not in my room as I would get disturbed. This was expressly agreed to by a man named Rahul Peters. It has been two weeks since then and I presumed the ACs had been serviced.
Today, again on the Saturday before my cases are listed in the Supreme Court on 11 April, the same men turned up to service the ACs. I called the maintenance head, the housekeeping supervisors and head, the reception. All of them refused to help and I was told that Vincent the maintenance head had ordered this. I was lied to that Vincent was not available or was in a meeting. All in all, I was forced to leave my room for the day because the intent was to target me.
After I went downstairs, I was able to meet the maintenance head. He and the two AC maintenance men (from I was told one M K Air-conditioners in Yusuf Sarai) then attempted to lie and said I had said Vincent kaun hai. I told Vincent that the next time I would record the conversation. Vincent denied that Rahul Peters had told him of my request from two weeks ago.
So, this is how I was forced out of my room. What is interesting is how all the staff refused to listen to my request that the ACs not be serviced today and that two weeks ago, I had requested that this not be done on a Saturday and that request was agreed to.
I am paying money to stay here as a guest. I made a very reasonable request two weeks ago that the ACs not be serviced on a Saturday as the area outside my room would get obstructed, I would be disturbed etc. Now two weeks later the same situation was created today. I was forced to leave the room because of this. False complaints were attempted to be made against me.
I have pictures of these AC men taken both on 23 March and today on 6 April. Apparently, the management at this place does not want me to take pictures. They sent me a letter after 23 March saying taking pictures was prohibited. I will certainly continue to take pictures if I am targeted and of persons used to target me. This is my legal right. I will now also maintain audio records of all my interactions with the management and staff of this place.
They are basically trying to create a situation where either I leave, or they can ask me to leave. I have been and am being poisoned here and there is evidence for this. They are trying to intimidate me and ganging up against me.
I am being poisoned to prevent me from appearing in my cases before the Supreme Court.
I have again been repeatedly poisoned in my guesthouse room last night and during the morning, day and evening today. Some kind of pesticides, poisonous gas and acidic chemical fumes/ gas have/has been released into my room. The staff and management of the guesthouse I am staying in is involved in my being poisoned here.
The Organization I am staying at and its affiliated organizations and influential members are since last year involved in a dispute being litigated before the Delhi High Court since last year. This coincides with my stay here. I have reason to believe that lawyers are being used to influence persons connected to this organization to enable my being harmed and poisoned. Some lawyers involved in that case have been involved in targeting me and are close to the Arun Jaitley cabal. Persons connected to the organization I am staying at are being blackmailed and controlled using these lawyers.
I was also poisoned last night outside gate 8 of the Delhi High Court. Nerve agents and pesticides in large quantities and poisonous gases were released into the area I was in. This was done by persons inside one or more of these houses - C1/49, C1/51, C2/50, C2-52 and C1/
59 Bapa Nagar. Or there were persons behind the Delhi High Court boundary wall who were responsible.
I was also targeted again including by the persons residing in C2/48.
Police in PCR vehicle 3602 was also used to target me outside Delhi High Court last night.
Text messages and calls were sent/ made by me to the SHO Tilak Marg and to DCP Madhur Verma. See attached.
Pictures of persons used to attack and target me last night are attached.
The following three cases filed by me were listed before the Supreme Court on 29 March - Criminal Appeal Diary No. 10342/2016, Writ Petition Civil no. 13/2018 and Writ Petition Civil No. 1027/2018. These were listed before J. A.M. Khanwilkar and J. Ajay Rastogi. I requested for an adjournment for one week. At my pointing out the urgency in the cases, all three matters have been adjourned to 11 April 2019. During the hearing, I questioned the hostility of the Bench toward a woman lawyer who has filed a writ petition under Article 32 complaining of sexual harassment against two powerful lawyers Soli J Sorabjee and Raian Karanjawala. Justice Khanwilkar was not allowing me to speak. I also questioned the completely inadequate institutional response of the Supreme Court to this sexual harassment complaint and case, where the woman lawyer victim of sexual harassment is being poisoned, has been rendered homeless since 2012, has been forced to sleep in her car for over three years and live in sleazy hotels all over the city where she has been poisoned, Where the woman complainant has been forced to beg for money to live since 2012 and where the woman lawyer has been repeatedly defamed including in the media by both Soli Sorabjee and Raian Karanjawala. Where the woman lawyer has been physically beaten by two policemen. And all this time the sexual harassment writ petition was not being listed. I also told the Court that I will prove that I was poisoned in the past and that I continue to be poisoned. Both J. Khanwilkar and J. Ajay Rastogi remained silent on my stating this. Is this not odd?
I do not think Justice Khanwilkar should hear my cases. He is from Bombay and has practiced as a lawyer in both the Bombay High Court and primarily in the Supreme Court of India. He would certainly have a relationship with Soli Sorabjee, Raian Karanjawala and with Zia Mody and their friends. J. Khanwilkar would have known several persons involved in my complaints including Nandini Gore and Ruby Singh Ahuja. J. Khanwilkar was completely hostile to me on 29 March and without cause. Did Justice Khanwilkar attend Tahira and Niharika Karanjawala's wedding events?
Several lawyers were present in Court during the hearing on 29 March 2019 either as counsel for Raian Karanjawala and Soli Sorabjee or as their "supporters". These included Ruby Singh Ahuja, Tahira Karanjawala, Niharika Karanjawala, Sidharth Luthra, Sidharth Bhatnagar, Gopal Jain, Mukul Rohatgi, Nisha Bagchi, Arvind Datar, Ajay Kapoor and several others.
Sidharth Luthra had once appeared in my case in the Delhi High Court in Seema Sapra versus General Electric Company & Others (Writ Petition Civil No. 1280/2012) as the Assistant Solicitor General and his "brief" was to get the Court to recall its orders directing the Police to protect me. This did not happen. But who engaged/ instructed Sidharth Luthra to appear in this case and for this purpose?
According to Bar Council Rules, a lawyer cannot appear in a case if he is likely to be a witness in that case. Some of these persons including Ruby Singh Ahuja, Nisha Bagchi, Sidharth Bhatnagar, Gopal Jain, Ajay Kapoor and even Mukul Rohatgi cannot appear for Soli Sorabjee or Raian Karanjawala in Writ Petition Civil 1027/2018 as they will end up as witnesses as a result of this case. They will be hostile witnesses with me having the right to cross-examine them.
The order passed by J. Mukta Gupta on 20 March 2019 in Criminal Writ Petition No. 437/2018 is reproduced below.
$~26
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 437/2018
SEEMA SAPRA ..... Petitioner
Represented by: Petitioner in person
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents
Represented by: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with Mr.Chaitanya Gosain and Mr. Amanpreet Singh, Advocates and SI Pramod, Cyber Cell, Crime Branch, Delhi
Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Mr.Nikhil Bhardwaj and Mr.Prateek Rai, Advocates for R-1 and R-2
Ms.Shruttima Ehersa, Advocate for R-5
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 20.03.2019
1. Petitioner who appears in person seeks time to file response to the communication placed on record by respondent No.5 as also the status report filed by the State. The same be filed within four weeks.
2. A perusal of the status report filed by the DCP, Cyber Cell, Crime Branch dated 18th March, 2019 in para h reveals that request was made by the investigating agency on 2nd March, 2019 to Google to provide other information i.e. recovery e-mail id, recovery mobile number and log-in /logW.P.(CRL) out IP address details with specific date and time. Despite a reminder being sent on 11th March, 2019 no reply has been received.
3. Learned counsel for respondent No.5 will ensure that the details as sought by the police for investigating the matter as noted in para h of the status report filed by the DCP concerned are made available to the DCP, Cyber Cell, Crime Branch within three weeks.
4. The DCP Cyber Cell, Crime Branch will also find out from the Airtel as to whether data beyond one year is available or not because even if under the license agreement issued by DoT the Airtel may destroy data beyond one year, it has to be clarified in this case whether the said data has been destroyed or is available. Respondent No.5 had placed the basic subscriber information and registration details associated with
seemasapraalert@gmail.com in a sealed cover on 18th January, 2019 which seal cover was opened. Respondent No.5 is directed to file the said documents along with certificate under Section 65(B) of the Indian Evidence Act.
5. The State will also file the documents referred to in the status report along with the next status report within two weeks with advance copy to the petitioner who appears in person.
6. Henceforth any status report filed in this case would be under the signatures of the DCP concerned and after approval of the Special Commissioner of Police, Crime Branch.
7. List on 14th May, 2019.
8. Order dasti.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
MARCH 20, 2019/mamta
The following order was passed by the Supreme Court on 1 March 2019 in Writ Petition Civil No. 13 of 2018 and in Writ Petition Civil No. 1027/2018.
1
ITEM NO.801 COURT NO.3 SECTION II-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition (Civil) No.13/2018
SEEMA SAPRA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH W.P.(C) No.1027/2018 (X)
Date : 01-03-2019 These matters were mentioned today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
For Appellant(s) Ms. Seema Sapra, Petitioner-in-person
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Ms. Seema Sapra, Advocate, who is appearing as the petitioner-in-person in these writ petitions, has mentioned before this Court today that she has been assaulted by some policemen outside the High Court of Delhi last night.
It would be appropriate if Ms. Sapra, petitioner-inperson, files an First Information Report (FIR) to that effect in the Office of appropriate Deputy Commissioner of Police who is in-charge of the Tilak Marg Police Station, New Delhi. She may also seek police protection since she apprehends danger to her life.
As prayed for, liberty is also granted to Ms. Sapra, petitioner-in-person, to file interlocutory application for directions in the main writ petitions.
(SANJAY KUMAR-II) (INDU KUMARI POKHRIYAL)
COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Seema Sapra
General Electric Company whistle-blower
No comments:
Post a Comment