Tuesday, 6 February 2018

Fwd: Message to Supreme Court Registrar regarding non-compliance with Order dated 29 January 2018 passed in Writ Petition Civil No. 1200 of 2017 by the Supreme Court


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:26 AM
Subject: Message to Supreme Court Registrar regarding non-compliance with Order dated 29 January 2018 passed in Writ Petition Civil No. 1200 of 2017 by the Supreme Court
To: "sci@nic.in" <sci@nic.in>, "dyreg.meenasarin@sci.nic.in" <dyreg.meenasarin@sci.nic.in>, "bo.anitabhatia@sci.nic.in" <bo.anitabhatia@sci.nic.in>, "Section-1B, Branch Officer" <sec.ib@sci.nic.in>, "sec.ii@sci.nic.in" <sec.ii@sci.nic.in>, "reg.sanjayparihar@sci.nic.in" <reg.sanjayparihar@sci.nic.in>, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@gmail.com>, Sapra Consultants <sapraconsultants@gmail.com>, "dyreg.rakeshsharma@sci.nic.in" <dyreg.rakeshsharma@sci.nic.in>, "ib-extension@sci.nic.in" <ib-extension@sci.nic.in>, "reg.ramkumarchoubey@sci.nic.in" <reg.ramkumarchoubey@sci.nic.in>, "reg.pradeepkumarsharma@sci.nic.in" <reg.pradeepkumarsharma@sci.nic.in>, "reg.deepakjain@sci.nic.in" <reg.deepakjain@sci.nic.in>, "reg.kapilmehta@sci.nic.in" <reg.kapilmehta@sci.nic.in>, "sg.rmaithani@sci.nic.in" <sg.rmaithani@sci.nic.in>, "reg.rajeshkumargoel@sci.nic.in" <reg.rajeshkumargoel@sci.nic.in>, "rg.dhc@nic.in" <rg.dhc@nic.in>, seema sapra <seemasapra@hotmail.com>, "II C Appeal & SLP (CM)" <sec.ii-c@sci.nic.in>


Dear Mr Ravindra Maithani and Mr Ramkumar Choubey, 

I request you to ensure that the order dated 29 January 2018 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Writ Petition Civil No. 1200/ 2017 is complied with by the Supreme Court Registry and that the record is transferred to the Delhi High Court so that the writ petition can be heard. The order is attached. 

This Writ Petition Civil No. 1200 of 2017 was listed for hearing before the Supreme Court of India on 29 January 2018. The following order was passed. 

"In the nature of the prayers made in this writ petition and having heard the petitioner, who appeared in person, we find no special reason as to why the petitioner should not pursue the grievances before the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Petitioner prays that the petition itself may be sent to the Delhi High Court for being registered as a Writ Petition.
We see no reason to deny such a request. Therefore, the Registry is directed to transmit the papers to the Delhi High Court for being appropriately dealt with.
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of."

Seema Sapra
General Electric Company whistle-blower 

No comments:

Post a Comment