---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: Legal Notice to Intercept Editor-in-Chief Betsy Reed about procured and planned whistleblower retaliation against General Electric Company whistleblower Seema Sapra by and on the Intercept website
To: Charlotte Greensit <charlotte.greensit@theintercept.com>, laura.poitras@theintercept.com, jeremy.scahill@theintercept.com, roger.hodge@theintercept.com, betsy.reed@theintercept.com, sam.biddle@theintercept.com, matthew.cole@theintercept.com, alleen.brown@theintercept.com, cora.currier@theintercept.com, ryan.devereaux@theintercept.com, alex.emmons@theintercept.com, lee.fang@theintercept.com, dan.froomkin@theintercept.com, ryan.gallagher@theintercept.com, murtaza.hussain@theintercept.com, zaid.jilani@theintercept.com, andrea.jones@theintercept.com, peter.maass@theintercept.com, robert.mackey@theintercept.com, morgan@firstlook.org, jenna.mclaughlin@theintercept.com, sheelagh.mcneill@theintercept.com, mattathias.schwartz@theintercept.com, liliana.segura@theintercept.com, jon.schwarz@theintercept.com, alice.speri@theintercept.com, jordan.smith@theintercept.com, ryan.tate@theintercept.com, moiz.syed@theintercept.com, sharon.weinberger@theintercept.com, margot.williams@theintercept.com, glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com, ti-media@firstlook.org, Travis Mannon <travis.mannon@theintercept.com>, legal@firstlook.org, rubina.fillion@theintercept.com, michael.bloom@firstlook.org, john.temple@firstlook.org, pierre.omidyar@firstlook.org, randy.ching@firstlook.org, todd.green@firstlook.org, carrie.lieberman@firstlook.org, lydia.cheuk@firstlook.org, josh.epstein@firstlook.org, lynn.oberlander@firstlook.org, oberlander@firstlook.org
Cc: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@gmail.com>, "jeffrey.immelt@ge.com" <jeffrey.immelt@ge.com>, ashish.sawkar@ic.fbi.gov, "fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov" <fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov>, "chairmanoffice@sec.gov" <chairmanoffice@sec.gov>, "Dimitrief, Alexander (GE, Corporate)" <alexander.dimitrief@ge.com>, "ny1@ic.fbi.gov" <ny1@ic.fbi.gov>, "pmosb@nic.in" <pmosb@nic.in>, "hm@nic.in" <hm@nic.in>, CP Delhi <cp.alokkumarverma@delhipolice.gov.in>, "preet.bharara@usdoj.gov" <preet.bharara@usdoj.gov>, sg.rmaithani@sci.nic.in, president@whitehouse.gov, "help@sec.gov" <help@sec.gov>
From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: Legal Notice to Intercept Editor-in-Chief Betsy Reed about procured and planned whistleblower retaliation against General Electric Company whistleblower Seema Sapra by and on the Intercept website
To: Charlotte Greensit <charlotte.greensit@theintercept.com>, laura.poitras@theintercept.com, jeremy.scahill@theintercept.com, roger.hodge@theintercept.com, betsy.reed@theintercept.com, sam.biddle@theintercept.com, matthew.cole@theintercept.com, alleen.brown@theintercept.com, cora.currier@theintercept.com, ryan.devereaux@theintercept.com, alex.emmons@theintercept.com, lee.fang@theintercept.com, dan.froomkin@theintercept.com, ryan.gallagher@theintercept.com, murtaza.hussain@theintercept.com, zaid.jilani@theintercept.com, andrea.jones@theintercept.com, peter.maass@theintercept.com, robert.mackey@theintercept.com, morgan@firstlook.org, jenna.mclaughlin@theintercept.com, sheelagh.mcneill@theintercept.com, mattathias.schwartz@theintercept.com, liliana.segura@theintercept.com, jon.schwarz@theintercept.com, alice.speri@theintercept.com, jordan.smith@theintercept.com, ryan.tate@theintercept.com, moiz.syed@theintercept.com, sharon.weinberger@theintercept.com, margot.williams@theintercept.com, glenn.greenwald@theintercept.com, ti-media@firstlook.org, Travis Mannon <travis.mannon@theintercept.com>, legal@firstlook.org, rubina.fillion@theintercept.com, michael.bloom@firstlook.org, john.temple@firstlook.org, pierre.omidyar@firstlook.org, randy.ching@firstlook.org, todd.green@firstlook.org, carrie.lieberman@firstlook.org, lydia.cheuk@firstlook.org, josh.epstein@firstlook.org, lynn.oberlander@firstlook.org, oberlander@firstlook.org
Cc: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@gmail.com>, "jeffrey.immelt@ge.com" <jeffrey.immelt@ge.com>, ashish.sawkar@ic.fbi.gov, "fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov" <fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov>, "chairmanoffice@sec.gov" <chairmanoffice@sec.gov>, "Dimitrief, Alexander (GE, Corporate)" <alexander.dimitrief@ge.com>, "ny1@ic.fbi.gov" <ny1@ic.fbi.gov>, "pmosb@nic.in" <pmosb@nic.in>, "hm@nic.in" <hm@nic.in>, CP Delhi <cp.alokkumarverma@delhipolice.gov.in>, "preet.bharara@usdoj.gov" <preet.bharara@usdoj.gov>, sg.rmaithani@sci.nic.in, president@whitehouse.gov, "help@sec.gov" <help@sec.gov>
My comments in this thread are again being suppressed.
The suppressed comments are reproduced below. Because they are being suppressed, no one can reply to them. So I am cut off from the interaction.
Seema Sapra @SeemaSapraLaw
January 9 2017, 10:17 a.m.
FBI Quietly Releases 300 Pages Of Hillary Clinton Investigation Records
Hillary Clinton should continue to be investigated not only for corruption and her email server linked violation of US law, but also for obstruction of justice and for corrupting Loretta Lynch, Comey etc. and thereby subverting the administration of justice.
Hope Judicial Watch does not give up.
↪ Reply
Seema Sapra @SeemaSapraLaw
January 9 2017, 10:11 a.m.
So Huma Abedin is not a Saudi agent, but Donald Trump is a Russian agent. Lets compare the evidence cited.
↪ Reply
Seema Sapra @SeemaSapraLaw ↪ Vic Perry
January 9 2017, 9:58 a.m.
Trump is waiting till the inauguration until he is in charge and Obama can no longer target him. Then Trump will say what he wants to.
↪ Reply
Benito Mussolini ↪ bahhummingbug
January 9 2017, 9:53 a.m.
I fail to see the distinction. ..
The distinction is that Russia could never have imagined that Trump would win. The point of the propaganda was that in the US, the 'good' candidates (Trump and Sanders according to RT) would lose – proving the US system was corrupt. As the article I linked stated:
The official party line disparaging collusion in America could carry a lot of weight in Mother Russia.
"They might say, 'Look what they're doing in their own country,'" Graham says. "'Why does the U.S. think that it should tender election monitors and determine what's free and fair?'"
Instead, the 'good' candidate won, vindicating US democracy and reducing the Russian propaganda effort to a pile of smoking rubble. They therefore had to call upon their friends in the CIA to hype the hacking that may or may not have occurred in order to deepen political rifts within the US and try to salvage a propaganda victory. Or at least that is one possibility.
↪ Reply
Seema Sapra @SeemaSapraLaw ↪ Benito Mussolini
January 9 2017, 9:49 a.m.
Having a good relationship with Russia is a good thing, not a bad thing. Only "stupid" people, or fools, would think that it is bad! We…..— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) January 7, 2017
↪ Reply
No comments:
Post a Comment