-----Original Message-----
From: seemasapra@hotmail.com
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 08:39:00
To: Seema<seema.sapra@gmail.com>; <hoteldeerparkk@gmail.com>; Bhim Sain Bassi<cp.bsbassi@nic.in>; <rg.dhc@nic.in>; CHAIRMANOFFICE<CHAIRMANOFFICE@SEC.GOV>; <dcbi@cbi.gov.in>; <pmosb@gov.in>
Reply-To: seemasapra@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Stay at hotel deer park in Safderjung Enclave
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
-----Original Message-----
From: <seemasapra@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:52:30
To: Seema<seema.sapra@gmail.com>; <hoteldeerparkk@gmail.com>; Bhim Sain Bassi<cp.bsbassi@nic.in>; <rg.dhc@nic.in>; CHAIRMANOFFICE<CHAIRMANOFFICE@SEC.GOV>; <dcbi@cbi.gov.in>; <pmosb@gov.in>
Cc: Sapra<seemasapra@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Stay at hotel deer park in Safderjung Enclave
Mr Rahul Chaudhary/ Hotel Deer Parkk,
I have emailed you earlier. I will be checking out today by 3 pm. I was offered the room @ Rs 2200 for the night inclusive of all taxes etc. I paid an advance last evening for Rs 2000 (and was given a receipt) and will be paying the balance of Rs 200 on check out. Pls keep the invoice ready showing that the bill has been settled.
Seema Sapra
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
-----Original Message-----
From: seema.sapra@googlemail.com
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 02:35:38
To: <hoteldeerparkk@gmail.com>; Sapra<seemasapra@hotmail.com>; Bhim Sain Bassi<cp.bsbassi@nic.in>; <rg.dhc@nic.in>; CHAIRMANOFFICE<CHAIRMANOFFICE@SEC.GOV>; <dcbi@cbi.gov.in>; <pmosb@gov.in>
Reply-To: seema.sapra@gmail.com
Subject: Stay at hotel deer park in Safderjung Enclave
I checked into the hotel deer park in Safderjung Enclave last evening.
I am being harassed by hotel staff for the last half hour by loud banging of doors outside my room. At 7 49 am, I was further harassed by someone who called my room from the hotel restaurant under the pretext of telling me that the breakfast buffet was ready. He told me his name was Vipin.
A man called Arif at the front desk tried to cover up when I complained about this call.
I am a lawyer who has filed a corruption case in the Delhi High Court and I refer to the following court order directing the Police Commissioner to provide me protection.
"IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 1280/2012 and CM APPL. Nos. 2770/2012, 7012/2012, 7175-
76/2012, 8677/2012, 8856/2012, 18642/2012, 19370/2012, 19501/2012,
19683/2012, 19820/2012, 105/2013, 326/2013, 428/2013, 522/2013,
1223/2013, 1679/2013, 2477/2013, 3380/2013, 3855/2013, 10492-93/2013
SEEMA SAPRA ..... Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person
versus
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. N. Ganpathy and Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Advocates for
respondent Nos.1, 6 and 7
Mr. A.K. Singh, proxy counsel for Mr. R.V. Sinha, Advocate for CVC/R-2
Mr. P.K. Singh, Advocate for
Mr. R.N. Singh, Advocate for R-4
Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ASC for Delhi Police with Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocate
Ms. Sapna Chauhan, Adv. for UOI
Mr. A.K. Singh and Mr. Bakul Jain, Advocates for Mr. P.K. Sharma,
Standing counsel for CBI
Mr. P.V. Saravana Raja and Mr. Abhilashattri, proxy counsels for
Mr. C. Mukuns and Mr. Firdouse Qutbwani, Advocates for R-13
Ms. Archna, Advocate for R-16
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
O R D E R
10.01.2014
Today, at the outset, the petitioner made a submission for adjourning
the matter as she has made a request to the Chief Justice of India as
well as to the Chief Justice of this Court for transfer of this writ
petition to the Hon?ble Supreme Court for hearing. We, however,
rejected the request for adjournment. So the petitioner has made
further submissions in the matter. Due to paucity of time matter is
adjourned to 24th January, 2014 for further submission.
Today Mr. Dayan Krishnan, learned counsel for the Delhi Police
submitted that on an independent assessment of the situation the
police has come to the conclusion that there is no immediate threat
perception to the petitioner as she has been projecting every now and
then and therefore, now it should be left to the discretion of the
police authorities as to whether any protection is to be provided to
her or not depending upon the inputs which the police may get. The
petitioner strongly refutes this submission. Considering all the facts
and circumstances we are not inclined to withdraw our earlier orders
directing the police to extend full protection to the life and liberty
of the petitioner till further orders of this Court.
P.K. BHASIN, J
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JANUARY 10, 2014"
Hotel staff here is now being used to harass me.
Seema Sapra
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
-----Original Message-----
From: seema.sapra@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 02:32:52
To: <hoteldeerparkk@gmail.com>; Seema<seema.sapra@gmail.com>; Sapra<seemasapra@hotmail.com>; Bhim Sain Bassi<cp.bsbassi@nic.in>; <rg.dhc@nic.in>; CHAIRMANOFFICE<CHAIRMANOFFICE@SEC.GOV>
Reply-To: seema.sapra@gmail.com
Subject: Stay at hotel deer park in Safderjung Enclave
I checked into the hotel deer park in Safderjung Enclave last evening.
I am being harassed by hotel staff for the last half hour by loud banging of doors outside my room. At 7 49 am, I was further harassed by someone who called my room from the hotel restaurant under the pretext of telling me that the breakfast buffet was ready. He told me his name was Vipin.
A man called Arif at the front desk tried to cover up when I complained about this call.
I am a lawyer who has filed a corruption case in the Delhi High Court and I refer to the following court order directing the Police Commissioner to provide me protection.
"IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 1280/2012 and CM APPL. Nos. 2770/2012, 7012/2012, 7175-
76/2012, 8677/2012, 8856/2012, 18642/2012, 19370/2012, 19501/2012,
19683/2012, 19820/2012, 105/2013, 326/2013, 428/2013, 522/2013,
1223/2013, 1679/2013, 2477/2013, 3380/2013, 3855/2013, 10492-93/2013
SEEMA SAPRA ..... Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person
versus
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. N. Ganpathy and Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Advocates for
respondent Nos.1, 6 and 7
Mr. A.K. Singh, proxy counsel for Mr. R.V. Sinha, Advocate for CVC/R-2
Mr. P.K. Singh, Advocate for
Mr. R.N. Singh, Advocate for R-4
Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ASC for Delhi Police with Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocate
Ms. Sapna Chauhan, Adv. for UOI
Mr. A.K. Singh and Mr. Bakul Jain, Advocates for Mr. P.K. Sharma,
Standing counsel for CBI
Mr. P.V. Saravana Raja and Mr. Abhilashattri, proxy counsels for
Mr. C. Mukuns and Mr. Firdouse Qutbwani, Advocates for R-13
Ms. Archna, Advocate for R-16
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
O R D E R
10.01.2014
Today, at the outset, the petitioner made a submission for adjourning
the matter as she has made a request to the Chief Justice of India as
well as to the Chief Justice of this Court for transfer of this writ
petition to the Hon?ble Supreme Court for hearing. We, however,
rejected the request for adjournment. So the petitioner has made
further submissions in the matter. Due to paucity of time matter is
adjourned to 24th January, 2014 for further submission.
Today Mr. Dayan Krishnan, learned counsel for the Delhi Police
submitted that on an independent assessment of the situation the
police has come to the conclusion that there is no immediate threat
perception to the petitioner as she has been projecting every now and
then and therefore, now it should be left to the discretion of the
police authorities as to whether any protection is to be provided to
her or not depending upon the inputs which the police may get. The
petitioner strongly refutes this submission. Considering all the facts
and circumstances we are not inclined to withdraw our earlier orders
directing the police to extend full protection to the life and liberty
of the petitioner till further orders of this Court.
P.K. BHASIN, J
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JANUARY 10, 2014"
Hotel staff here is now being used to harass me.
Seema Sapra
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
No comments:
Post a Comment