Seema Sapra - General Electric corruption whistle-blower: the Truth prevails : Fwd: General Electric Company whistleblower Seema Sapra threatened & targeted by Starbucks employee Mitlesh at Cyberhub

A man in a green T Shirt sitting on my left with two other men and two women is targeting me.

He also appears to be in league with Starbucks employee Mitlesh.

He has been giving me dirty looks since he arrived and appears to know Mitlesh.

Seema Sapra

General Electric Company whistleblower

On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:28 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:

Please read below my complaints that Starbucks employee Mitlesh has been targeting me and is now threatening me.

I am going to sue Starbucks for this.

http://seemasapra.blogspot.com/2017/07/fwd-general-electric-company_853.html

Seema Sapra
General Electric Company whistleblower

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: General Electric Company whistleblower Seema Sapra being targeted at Starbucks in Cyberhub - re SEC Complaint TCR1439646785831
To: "sho-daryaganj-dl@nic.in" <sho-daryaganj-dl@nic.in>, "sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in" <sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in>, "dcbi@cbi.gov.in" <dcbi@cbi.gov.in>, "pmosb@nic.in" <pmosb@nic.in>, "sg.rmaithani@sci.nic.in" <sg.rmaithani@sci.nic.in>, "president@whitehouse.gov" <president@whitehouse.gov>, "sho-gk-dl@nic.in" <sho-gk-dl@nic.in>, "rg.dhc@nic.in" <rg.dhc@nic.in>, "sho-crpark-dl@nic.in" <sho-crpark-dl@nic.in>, "sho-ptstreet-dl@nic.in" <sho-ptstreet-dl@nic.in>, "EthicsAndCompliance@starbucks.com" <EthicsAndCompliance@starbucks.com>, "ny1@ic.fbi.gov" <ny1@ic.fbi.gov>, "sho-hauzkhas-dl@nic.in" <sho-hauzkhas-dl@nic.in>, "cp.ggn@hry.nic.in" <cp.ggn@hry.nic.in>, hschultz <hschultz@starbucks.com>, "banmali.agrawala@ge.com" <banmali.agrawala@ge.com>, "chairmanoffice@sec.gov" <chairmanoffice@sec.gov>, "fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov" <fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov>, "cp.amulyapatnaik@delhipolice.gov.in" <cp.amulyapatnaik@delhipolice.gov.in>, "Dimitrief, Alexander (GE, Corporate)" <alexander.dimitrief@ge.com>, "Suhel.Daud@ic.fbi.gov" <Suhel.Daud@ic.fbi.gov>, "cmdelhi@nic.in" <cmdelhi@nic.in>, "lggc.delhi@nic.in" <lggc.delhi@nic.in>, Ashish Sawkar <ashish.sawkar@gmail.com>, "ashish.sawkar@ic.fbi.gov" <ashish.sawkar@ic.fbi.gov>, "sho-safdarjung-dl@nic.in" <sho-safdarjung-dl@nic.in>, "lhelm@starbucks.com" <lhelm@starbucks.com>, "customercare@tatastarbucks.com" <customercare@tatastarbucks.com>, "sho-amarclny-dl@nic.in" <sho-amarclny-dl@nic.in>, "jeff.immelt@ge.com" <jeff.immelt@ge.com>, "sho-patelngr-dl@nic.in" <sho-patelngr-dl@nic.in>, "NDwebmail@state.gov" <NDwebmail@state.gov>, "jeffrey.immelt@ge.com" <jeffrey.immelt@ge.com>, "john.flannery@ge.com" <john.flannery@ge.com>, "sho-defenceclny-dl@nic.in" <sho-defenceclny-dl@nic.in>, "sumi.ghosh@starbucks.com" <sumi.ghosh@starbucks.com>, "sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in" <sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in>, sho-saket-dl@nic.in, sho-cp-dl@nic.in, akshat.jerath@tatastarbucks.com, rajiv.kumar@tatastarbucks.com, chetan.kapoor@tatastarbucks.com, shwetank.sharma@tatastarbucks.com, S035@tatastarbucks.com, S010@tatastarbucks.com, S013@tatastarbucks.com, S011@tatastarbucks.com, S012@tatastarbucks.com, S014@tatastarbucks.com, S015@tatastarbucks.com, S016@tatastarbucks.com, S017@tatastarbucks.com, S018@tatastarbucks.com, S019@tatastarbucks.com, S020@tatastarbucks.com, S021@tatastarbucks.com, S022@tatastabucks.com, S023@tatastarbucks.com, S024@tatastarbucks.com, S025@tatastarbucks.com, S026@tatastarbucks.com, S027@tatastarbucks.com, S028@tatastarbucks.com, S029@tatastarbucks.com, S030@tatastarbucks.com, S031@tatastarbucks.com, S032@tatastarbucks.com, S033@tatastarbucks.com, S034@tatastarbucks.com
Cc: seema sapra <seemasapra@hotmail.com>, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@gmail.com>

Every Starbucks store has a Store manager and a deputy store manager.

The store manager here is Sowmya who I have been asking to meet for several days but I am not being allowed to meet her by Mitlesh.

The Deputy store manager is Vidit who was being used to target me by one Udit Malhotra of Burston Marsteller hired by GE.

Either Vidit or Sowmya should be in the store today but I have been told by Mitlesh that both are on leave.

Mitlesh has been targeting me here for sometime. Now she is being used to ensure that I do not come here.

Does she own this Starbucks store? Is it her personal property that she can threaten to have me evicted by security because I ate two biscuits after taking several medicine pills including a strong antibiotic?

Can she threaten to use security to have me evicted because I ask to speak to Vidit or Sowmya or because I tell I will be complaining against her and that I have complained against her in the past? Can she threaten to have me evicted because I tell her that I am entitled to eat two biscuits after taking medicine?

What kind of behavior is this? Who inside Starbucks India is encouraging Mitlesh to target me and to threaten me?

Seema Sapra
General Electric Company whistleblower

On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
Mitlesh is threatening me because I have made several complaints that she is targeting me.

She has threatened to call DLF security twice in the last half hour to have me evicted from the Starbucks at Cyberhub.

The first time was because I ate two small biscuits about 2 inches in diameter after taking a powerful antibiotic Augmentin, an anti-histamine and some other pills.

The second time was when I went to the counter and asked to speak to the store managers Vidit or Sowmya and when I told Mitlesh that I was entitled to eat a biscuit after taking medicine and that this did not amount to consuming outside food.

I have told her to stop threatening me.

Starbucks district manager Shwetank Sharma appears to be encouraging Mitlesh to target me.

Seema Sapra
General Electric Company whistleblower

On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
I have informed Mitlesh that I have complained about her. She tells me she does not care. She knows that I have made several complaints about her.

I asked to speak to Sownya again and am told she is not here.

Mitlesh has again threatened to call security to have me evicted from Starbucks.

I have told her that she should stop threatening me.

This is all planned because GE does not want me at Cyberhub or at this Starbucks.

Seema Sapra
General Electric Company whistleblower

On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
I have a complaint of deliberate targeting against Starbucks Cyberhub Shift supervisor Mitlesh.

I had medicines and needed to eat two small biscuits after that.

Mitlesh again comes to me and started hassling me about that.

I told her I had taken medicine and need to eat the biscuits because of that.

She threatened me that she would call security to have me removed from Starbucks.

She refused to call Sowmya the Starbucks store manager.

I am copying all the stores because I am not being allowed to speak to the store manager
This is deliberate targeting.

Seema Sapra
General Electric Company whistleblower

11.45 am

I am sitting at the Starbucks in Cyberhub in Gurgaon which is GE's backyard, with their offices being in Cybercity.

The Starbucks manager here is Sowmya. The Deputy manager is Vidit.

As usual, GE is having me targeted with poisonous chemicals here. Persons are being used to sit or come close to me and to poison me with chemicals.

I arrived here on the Delhi Metro and on the Gurgaon Rapid Metro.

I was targeted with chemicals at the Jorbagh Metro stop by a man waiting by the elevator. I was targeted at the Sikanderpur Rapid Metro stop by men following me and by Rapid Metro security/ ERT men. I was also targeted by a woman outside the washroom at the IndusInd Bank Rapid Metro stop.

Attempts to poison me were again made when I was walking from the Rapid Metro station to Cyberhub. Cyberhub staff and security guards were involved.

Shift supervisor at Starbucks Mitlesh and Starbucks employees Krishna especially are being used to target me.

Seema Sapra
General Electric Company whistleblower

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:18 PM
Subject: Cover-up of complaint of forgery against General Electric Company made by whistleblower Seema Sapra - re SEC Complaint TCR1439646785831
To: "sho-daryaganj-dl@nic.in" <sho-daryaganj-dl@nic.in>, "sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in" <sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in>, "dcbi@cbi.gov.in" <dcbi@cbi.gov.in>, "pmosb@nic.in" <pmosb@nic.in>, "sg.rmaithani@sci.nic.in" <sg.rmaithani@sci.nic.in>, "president@whitehouse.gov" <president@whitehouse.gov>, "sho-gk-dl@nic.in" <sho-gk-dl@nic.in>, "rg.dhc@nic.in" <rg.dhc@nic.in>, "sho-crpark-dl@nic.in" <sho-crpark-dl@nic.in>, "sho-ptstreet-dl@nic.in" <sho-ptstreet-dl@nic.in>, "EthicsAndCompliance@starbucks.com" <EthicsAndCompliance@starbucks.com>, "ny1@ic.fbi.gov" <ny1@ic.fbi.gov>, "sho-hauzkhas-dl@nic.in" <sho-hauzkhas-dl@nic.in>, "cp.ggn@hry.nic.in" <cp.ggn@hry.nic.in>, hschultz <hschultz@starbucks.com>, "banmali.agrawala@ge.com" <banmali.agrawala@ge.com>, "chairmanoffice@sec.gov" <chairmanoffice@sec.gov>, "fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov" <fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov>, "cp.amulyapatnaik@delhipolice.gov.in" <cp.amulyapatnaik@delhipolice.gov.in>, "Dimitrief, Alexander (GE, Corporate)" <alexander.dimitrief@ge.com>, "Suhel.Daud@ic.fbi.gov" <Suhel.Daud@ic.fbi.gov>, "cmdelhi@nic.in" <cmdelhi@nic.in>, "lggc.delhi@nic.in" <lggc.delhi@nic.in>, Ashish Sawkar <ashish.sawkar@gmail.com>, "ashish.sawkar@ic.fbi.gov" <ashish.sawkar@ic.fbi.gov>, "sho-safdarjung-dl@nic.in" <sho-safdarjung-dl@nic.in>, "lhelm@starbucks.com" <lhelm@starbucks.com>, "customercare@tatastarbucks.com" <customercare@tatastarbucks.com>, "sho-amarclny-dl@nic.in" <sho-amarclny-dl@nic.in>, "jeff.immelt@ge.com" <jeff.immelt@ge.com>, "sho-patelngr-dl@nic.in" <sho-patelngr-dl@nic.in>, "NDwebmail@state.gov" <NDwebmail@state.gov>, "jeffrey.immelt@ge.com" <jeffrey.immelt@ge.com>, "john.flannery@ge.com" <john.flannery@ge.com>, "sho-defenceclny-dl@nic.in" <sho-defenceclny-dl@nic.in>, "sumi.ghosh@starbucks.com" <sumi.ghosh@starbucks.com>, "sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in" <sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in>, sho-saket-dl@nic.in, sho-cp-dl@nic.in, "cvc@nic.in" <cvc@nic.in>, "advamit.sharma@gmail.com" <advamit.sharma@gmail.com>, "kirti_uppal@yahoo.com" <kirti_uppal@yahoo.com>, Scba India <scbaec@gmail.com>, "mr@rb.railnet.gov.in" <mr@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "crb@rb.railnet.gov.in" <crb@rb.railnet.gov.in>, gopi krishnan <jgopikrishnan@yahoo.com>, rajiv.vc@nic.in, tmb.vc@nic.in, fmo@nic.in, "hm@nic.in" <hm@nic.in>, "help@sec.gov" <help@sec.gov>, "newhaven@ic.fbi.gov" <newhaven@ic.fbi.gov>, Subramanian Swamy <swamy39@gmail.com>, Prashant Bhushan <prashantbhush@gmail.com>
Cc: seema sapra <seemasapra@hotmail.com>, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@gmail.com>

20 July 2017

Dear Prime Minister Narendra Modi,
Let me present below some additional facts in connection with my complaint that the customer certificate for Kazakhstan Railway submitted by GE with its RFQ application to the Railway Ministry on 12 July 2010 for the second (aborted) tender for the Marhowra diesel locomotive factory was a tampered and therefore forged document.
I made this complaint to the CVC by email dated 11.01.2011.

The Central Vigilance Commission registered a complaint on this email complaint, numbered the complaint as complaint no. 107/11/1 and informed me about it by CVC letter dated 30.5.2011. This letter is attached.

No further action took place on this letter.

Thus, when I filed Writ Petition 1280/ 2012 in the Delhi High Court against GE, the Railway Ministry and the CVC, I also pleaded that the CVC had not acted further after registering a complaint.

Notice was issued to both the Railway Ministry and the CVC (among other respondents) by the Delhi High Court on 7 March 2012.

Note that initially no lawyer appeared for the CVC and no affidavit was filed for the CVC despite service of the court notice.

On 2 July 2012, a counter affidavit signed by a Railway Officer Nihar Ranjan Dash was filed for the Railway Ministry which was respondent no. 4. This was filed through a lawyer R N Singh, who claimed to be the Standing Counsel for Railways.

First fraud – This affidavit was described as an affidavit not only on behalf of the Railway Ministry but also as an affidavit on behalf of the CVC.
A railway officer has no authority or legal standing to file an affidavit on behalf of the CVC and the description of this affidavit as the CVC affidavit constitutes perjury, fraud and deception of the highest order committed against the Delhi High Court.

Paragraph 3 of this Railway Affidavit dated 2 July 2012 read as under:
"3. That the Central Vigilance Commission vide its letter No. 117/RLY/16/124624 dated 11.04.2011 had forwarded to Railway Board a copy of e-mail complaint dated 11.01.2011 received in the Commission from Ms. Seema Sapra, Advocate, New Delhi in which the complainant alleged that fake Customer Certificate was submitted by M/s. GE Global Sourcing India Pvt. Ltd. in connection with Request for Qualification (RFQ) for setting up Diesel Locomotive Factory at Marhowra, District – Saran, Bihar. On receipt of the complaint, the matter was got thoroughly investigated and the investigation has revealed that Clause 3.2 related to "Technical Capacity', inter-alia, mentioned that the applicant firm should have manufactured and supplied at least 1000 Mainline Diesel Electric Locomotives over the period of last ten years. Scrutiny of the tender file revealed that as per the Customers' Certificate attached at page 63 to 113 of the RFQ submitted by M/s. GE Global Sourcing India Pvt. Ltd., the company had designed, manufactured and supplied total 2326 mainline Diesel Electric Locomotives over a period of last ten years. Thus, it is noticed that even if the Customer Certificate issued by Kazakhstan Railway for 10 No. of locomotives supplied by M/s. GE Global Sourcing India Pvt. Ltd. is discarded, the firm was fulfilling the 'Technical Capacity' criteria, as the requirement as per clause 3.2 of the RFQ is only 1000 locomotives over the period of last ten years. Thus, investigation has found that the firm M/s. Global Sourcing India Pvt. Ltd. has not derived any advantage by submitting the scanned copy. Therefore, no substance was found in the allegation. The report of investigation was sent to the Central Vigilance Commission and the Central Vigilance Commission after perusal of the Investigation Report and the comments of the administrative authorities thereon has advised closure of the case vide CVC's ID No. 117/RLY/16/145435 dated 19.09.20111 (Annexure R-1).

Annexure R-1 to this affidavit is a single page numbered as internal page 14 in the affidavit and is attached.

Note that this alleged CVC document is not on the CVC letter-head. It is signed by one R C Arora described merely as "Director".
Note that this alleged CVC document does not mention the complaint number assigned by the CVC to my complaint of forgery, i.e., complaint no. 107/11/1.

Note also that this document has an internal page number printed on top by hand which reads "-10-".

It is quite clear that this single page is the last page (page no. 10) of a 10-page document. The first nine pages of this document are missing.
It is also quite clear that the Railway Ministry affidavit has fraudulently produced before the Delhi High Court the last page of a 10-page CVC letter issued with respect to some other complaint (not complaint no. 107/11/1 pertaining to GE), as a complete CVC document advising closure of the forgery complaint against GE. This against constitutes perjury, forgery, fraud and deception of the highest order against the Delhi High Court.

Note also that this alleged CVC document does not mention the complaint number, does not mention the undersigned (the complainant) or GE, does not mention the word forgery or the words Kazakhstan customer certificate. It has no discussion of the complaint of forgery or of any alleged investigation of that complaint.

This alleged document mentions an investigation report, the comments of the administrative authorities thereon, and a Railway Board communication dated 12.08.2011, none of which were produced with this affidavit.

Also note that paragraph 3 of the Railway Affidavit dated 2 July 2012, which has been reproduced above itself contains several false and misleading statements.

Paragraph 3 states that GE did not require the Customer Certificate issued by Kazakhstan Railway for 10 No. of locomotives for fulfilling the 'Technical Capacity' criteria, toward meeting the RFQ requirement for supply of 1000 locomotives over the period of last ten years.

This statement is misleading and false. GE did need the Kazakhstan certificate to meet the additional RFQ requirement that the 1000 locomotives should be of different variants, i.e., locomotives of 6000 HP must be with either gauge or service application variations. GE does not meet the requirement for two variants prescribed by Clause 3.2.1 of the RFQ without the Kazakhstan Railways customer certificate.
Therefore, the following statements in paragraph 3 of the Railway Ministry are misleading and false.
1. That the complaint of fake customer certificate was thoroughly investigated.
2. That the fake Kazakhstan certificate could simply have been discarded by the Railway Ministry.
3. That GE did not derive any advantage by submitting the Kazakhstan Railway customer certificate.
4. That therefore and for the above reasons alone there was no substance found in the allegation of forgery.

In addition, as already described above, the Railway Ministry officer Nihar Ranjan Dash was used to deceive the Delhi High Court by fraudulently filing an affidavit on behalf of the CVC and by fraudulently producing a fake CVC letter advising closure of the forgery complaint against GE.

There has been no investigation by the CVC of this complaint of forgery.

The judgment issued by the Delhi High Court in Writ Petition 1280/2012 dated March 2, 2015 which I have contended before the Supreme Court of India was issued without affording me a hearing, refers to and reproduces this very paragraph 3 in the Railway Affidavit dated 2 July 2012 after stating the following :-
"In fact, the petitioner had filed a complaint with CVC with regard to some of her allegations made in this petition, and the records of this court show that after replying to the petitioner that the complaint has been looked into, CVC ultimately had advised closure of the case and this is so stated in the counter- affidavit of respondents no. 2 and 4/Railways dated 2.7.2012 and the relevant para of the counter-affidavit is para 3 which reads as under:- "

It is therefore clear that a grave fraud has been committed on the Delhi High Court and Railway Ministry officials were used to collude in covering of this complaint against GE.

I only add that it will be clear to the Government of India that forgery of a customer certificate submitted with a Government tender is a serious matter and cannot be brushed under the carpet even if the 2010 Marhowra tender was cancelled.

Further, the perjury, fraud, forgery and deception committed by the Railway Ministry in its affidavit dated 2 July 2012 against the Delhi High Court to save and protect GE is also a very serious matter which also cannot be brushed under the carpet.

I would like to know Mr. Prime Minister Narendra Modi what action you intend to take on the facts presented by me above.

Seema Sapra
General Electric Company whistleblower

Seema Sapra - General Electric corruption whistle-blower: the Truth prevails

Pages

Sunday 23 July 2017

Fwd: General Electric Company whistleblower Seema Sapra threatened & targeted by Starbucks employee Mitlesh at Cyberhub - re SEC Complaint TCR1439646785831

No comments:

Post a Comment

My Blog List