Seema Sapra - General Electric corruption whistle-blower: the Truth prevails : Complaint to the President of India seeking impeachment of Supreme Court Judge A K Sikri and Delhi High Court Judge R S Endlaw for participation in conspiracy & attempt to murder me on 17 Feb 2012 - from Seema Sapra, General Electric whistle-blower in WP Civil 1280 of 2012, a corruption whistle-blower petition in the Delhi High Court (Seema Sapra v General Electric Company and Others)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 3:36 PM
Subject: Complaint to the President of India seeking impeachment of Supreme Court Judge A K Sikri and Delhi High Court Judge R S Endlaw for participation in conspiracy & attempt to murder me on 17 Feb 2012 - from Seema Sapra, General Electric whistle-blower in WP Civil 1280 of 2012, a corruption whistle-blower petition in the Delhi High Court (Seema Sapra v General Electric Company and Others)
To: pmosb <pmosb@gov.in>, Amit Shah <amitshah.bjp@gmail.com>, sanjayjain.chamber@gmail.com, "director@aiims.ac.in" <director@aiims.ac.in>, lggc.delhi@nic.in, "rg.dhc@nic.in" <rg.dhc@nic.in>, Bhim Sain Bassi <cp.bsbassi@nic.in>, joe.kaeser@siemens.com, dch@nic.in, "splcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in" <splcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in>, "splcp-crime-dl@nic.in" <splcp-crime-dl@nic.in>, jtcp-cr-dl@nic.in, "jtcp-nr-dl@nic.in" <jtcp-nr-dl@nic.in>, jtcp-ser-dl@nic.in, jtcp-swr-dl@nic.in, "jtcp-phq-dl@nic.in" <jtcp-phq-dl@nic.in>, jtcp-ga-dl@nic.in, "jtcpt_dtp@nic.in" <jtcpt_dtp@nic.in>, "jtcp-crime-dl@nic.in" <jtcp-crime-dl@nic.in>, jtcp-splcell-dl@nic.in, jtcp-sec-dl@nic.in, "jcpsec@rb.nic.in" <jcpsec@rb.nic.in>, "addlcp-eow-dl@nic.in" <addlcp-eow-dl@nic.in>, jtcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in, jtcp-sb-dl@nic.in, addlcp-crime-dl@nic.in, "addlcpt-dtp@nic.in" <addlcpt-dtp@nic.in>, "addlcp-caw-dl@nic.in" <addlcp-caw-dl@nic.in>, dcp-west-dl@nic.in, addlcp-se-dl@nic.in, "dcp-southwest-dl@nic.in" <dcp-southwest-dl@nic.in>, "dcp-crime-dl@nic.in" <dcp-crime-dl@nic.in>, dcp-eow-dl@nic.in, dcp-splcell-dl@nic.in, dcp-east-dl@nic.in, dcp-northeast-dl@nic.in, "dcp-central-dl@nic.in" <dcp-central-dl@nic.in>, dcp-north-dl@nic.in, dcp-northwest-dl@nic.in, "dcp-south-dl@nic.in" <dcp-south-dl@nic.in>, dcp-outer-dl@nic.in, "dcp-newdelhi-dl@nic.in" <dcp-newdelhi-dl@nic.in>, "dcp-pcr-dl@nic.in" <dcp-pcr-dl@nic.in>, "dcp-southeast-dl@nic.in" <dcp-southeast-dl@nic.in>, dcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in, "sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in" <sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in>, "sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in" <sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in>, "addl-dcp2-nd-dl@nic.in" <addl-dcp2-nd-dl@nic.in>, "acp-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in" <acp-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in>, "sho-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in" <sho-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in>, "sho-hndin-dl@nic.in" <sho-hndin-dl@nic.in>, "Madder, Emily" <emily.madder@siemens.com>, "banmali.agrawala@ge.com" <banmali.agrawala@ge.com>, "cmukund@mukundcherukuri.com" <cmukund@mukundcherukuri.com>, rajshekhar rao <rao.rajshekhar@gmail.com>, "vikram@duaassociates.com" <vikram@duaassociates.com>, "sec-jus@gov.in" <sec-jus@gov.in>, "pk.malhotra@nic.in" <pk.malhotra@nic.in>, "ramakrishnan.r@nic.in" <ramakrishnan.r@nic.in>, "jmg.vc@nic.in" <jmg.vc@nic.in>, "cvc@nic.in" <cvc@nic.in>, "hm@nic.in" <hm@nic.in>, "hshso@nic.in" <hshso@nic.in>, "complaintcell-ncw@nic.in" <complaintcell-ncw@nic.in>, "sgnhrc@nic.in" <sgnhrc@nic.in>, "dg-nhrc@nic.in" <dg-nhrc@nic.in>, "newhaven@ic.fbi.gov" <newhaven@ic.fbi.gov>, "ny1@ic.fbi.gov" <ny1@ic.fbi.gov>, "usanys.wpcomp@usdoj.gov" <usanys.wpcomp@usdoj.gov>, "nalin.jain@ge.com" <nalin.jain@ge.com>, "helpline@eda.admin.ch" <helpline@eda.admin.ch>, _EDA-Vertretung-New-Delhi <ndh.vertretung@eda.admin.ch>, _EDA-VISA New-Delhi <ndh.visa@eda.admin.ch>, _EDA-Etat Civil New Delhi <ndh.etatcivil@eda.admin.ch>, "vertretung@ndh.rep.admin.ch" <vertretung@ndh.rep.admin.ch>, "emb@rusembassy.in" <emb@rusembassy.in>, indconru indconru <indconru@gmail.com>, "web.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk" <web.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk>, "conqry.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk" <conqry.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk>, "LegalisationEnquiries@fco.gov.uk" <LegalisationEnquiries@fco.gov.uk>, "delegation-india@eeas.europa.eu" <delegation-india@eeas.europa.eu>, "re-india.commerce@international.gc.ca" <re-india.commerce@international.gc.ca>, "info@new-delhi.diplo.de" <info@new-delhi.diplo.de>, Ambassaden New Delhi <ambassaden.new-delhi@foreign.ministry.se>, "delamb@um.dk" <delamb@um.dk>, "emb.newdelhi@mfa.no" <emb.newdelhi@mfa.no>, "chinaemb_in@mfa.gov.cn" <chinaemb_in@mfa.gov.cn>, "InfoDesk@ohchr.org" <InfoDesk@ohchr.org>, "Press-Info@ohchr.org" <Press-Info@ohchr.org>, "civilsociety@ohchr.org" <civilsociety@ohchr.org>, "nationalinstitutions@ohchr.org" <nationalinstitutions@ohchr.org>, "webmaster@ambafrance-in.org" <webmaster@ambafrance-in.org>, "info_visa_delhi@ambafrance-in.org" <info_visa_delhi@ambafrance-in.org>, "VA@ndh.rep.admin.ch" <VA@ndh.rep.admin.ch>, "indne@unhcr.org" <indne@unhcr.org>, "ambasciata.newdelhi@esteri.it" <ambasciata.newdelhi@esteri.it>, "chinaconsul_kkt@mfa.gov.cn" <chinaconsul_kkt@mfa.gov.cn>, "chinaconsul_mum_in@mfa.gov.cn" <chinaconsul_mum_in@mfa.gov.cn>, "webmaster@mfa.gov.cn" <webmaster@mfa.gov.cn>, "in@mofcom.gov.cn" <in@mofcom.gov.cn>, "sapnachauhan.chauhan192@gmail.com" <sapnachauhan.chauhan192@gmail.com>, "dcbi@cbi.gov.in" <dcbi@cbi.gov.in>, "mr@rb.railnet.gov.in" <mr@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "crb@rb.railnet.gov.in" <crb@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "me@rb.railnet.gov.in" <me@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "mm@rb.railnet.gov.in" <mm@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "ms@rb.railnet.gov.in" <ms@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "secyrb@rb.railnet.gov.in" <secyrb@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "legaladv@rb.railnet.gov.in" <legaladv@rb.railnet.gov.in>, "r_s_chidambaram@cat.com" <r_s_chidambaram@cat.com>, "rathin.basu@alstom.com" <rathin.basu@alstom.com>, "Dimitrief, Alexander (GE, Corporate)" <alexander.dimitrief@ge.com>, "Eglash, Jeffrey C (GE, Corporate)" <jeffrey.eglash@ge.com>, Nanju Ganpathy <nanju.ganpathy@azbpartners.com>, "bradford.berenson@ge.com" <bradford.berenson@ge.com>, "brackett.denniston@ge.com" <brackett.denniston@ge.com>, "jeffrey.immelt@ge.com" <jeffrey.immelt@ge.com>, "john.flannery@ge.com" <john.flannery@ge.com>, "delhihighcourt@nic.in" <delhihighcourt@nic.in>, "pmosb@nic.in" <pmosb@nic.in>, "askdoj@usdoj.gov" <askdoj@usdoj.gov>, "CHAIRMANOFFICE@SEC.GOV" <CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov>, "help@sec.gov" <help@sec.gov>, "fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov" <fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov>, "radhakrishnan.k@ge.com" <radhakrishnan.k@ge.com>, "preet.bharara@usdoj.gov" <preet.bharara@usdoj.gov>, "NDwebmail@state.gov" <NDwebmail@state.gov>, "ffetf@usdoj.gov" <ffetf@usdoj.gov>, "fja@federaljudgesassoc.org" <fja@federaljudgesassoc.org>, "supremecourt@nic.in" <supremecourt@nic.in>, "Loretta_A._Preska@nysd.uscourts.gov" <Loretta_A._Preska@nysd.uscourts.gov>, "ombudsperson@corporate.ge.com" <ombudsperson@corporate.ge.com>, Directors@corporate.ge.com, Siemens Ombudsman COM <mail@siemens-ombudsman.com>, compliance.office@bombardier.com, pierre.beaudoin@bombardier.com, william.ainsworth@caterpillar.com, CATshareservices@cat.com, BusinessPractices@cat.com, patrick.kron@alstom.com, keith.carr@alstom.com, Jean-David.barnea@usdoj.gov, reed.brodsky@usdoj.gov, andrew.michaelson@usdoj.gov, ellen.davis@usdoj.gov, eric.glover@usdoj.gov, paul.murphy@usdoj.gov, sandra.glover@usdoj.gov, robert.spector@usdoj.gov, christopher.connolly@usdoj.gov, joseph.cordaro@usdoj.gov, christopher.harwood@usdoj.gov, michael.byars@usdoj.gov, joseph.hogsett@usdoj.gov, stephanie.rose@usdoj.gov, kerry.harvey@usdoj.gov, david.hale@usdoj.gov, stephanie.finley@usdoj.gov, rod.rosenstein@usdoj.gov, carmen.ortiz@usdoj.gov, barbara.mcquade@usdoj.gov, b.todd.jones@usdoj.gov, william.martin@usdoj.gov, richard.callahan@usdoj.gov, beth.phillips@usdoj.gov, michael.cotter@usdoj.gov, deborah.gilg@usdoj.gov, daniel.bogden@usdoj.gov, john.kacavas@usdoj.gov, paul.fishman@usdoj.gov, kenneth.gonzales@usdoj.gov, loretta.lynch@usdoj.gov, richard.hartunian@usdoj.gov, william.hochul@usdoj.gov, john.stone@usdoj.gov, anne.tompkins@usdoj.gov, tim.purdon@usdoj.gov, steve.dettelbach@usdoj.gov, carter.stewart@usdoj.gov, sandy.coats@usdoj.gov, zane.memeger@usdoj.gov, peter.smith@usdoj.gov, david.hickton@usdoj.gov, peter.neronha@usdoj.gov, bill.nettles@usdoj.gov, william.killian@usdoj.gov, jerry.martin@usdoj.gov, edward.stanton@usdoj.gov, jose.moreno@usdoj.gov, carlie.christensen@usdoj.gov, tristram.coffin@usdoj.gov, ronald.sharpe@usdoj.gov, neil.macbride@usdoj.gov, timothy.heaphy@usdoj.gov, bill.ihlenfeld@usdoj.gov, booth.goodwin@usdoj.gov, james.santelle@usdoj.gov, john.vaudreuil@usdoj.gov, christopher.crofts@usdoj.gov, bprao@bhel.in, ajay.sinha@emdiesels.com, armin.bruck@siemens.com, sunil.mathur@siemens.com, benoit.martel@bombardier.com, roland.busch@siemens.com, michael.suess@siemens.com, klaus.helmrich@siemens.com, daniel.desjardins@bombardier.com, james.buda@caterpillar.com, glen.lehman@progressrail.com, alert.procedure@alstom.com, "Warin, F. Joseph" <fwarin@gibsondunn.com>, "Chesley, John" <JChesley@gibsondunn.com>, confidential@sfo.gsi.gov.uk, public.enquiries@sfo.gsi.gov.uk, luis.quesada@ic.fbi.gov, steven.kessler@ic.fbi.gov, henry.gittleman@ic.fbi.gov, renn.cannon@ic.fbi.gov, eric.peterson@ic.fbi.gov, jeff.bedford@ic.fbi.gov, david.brooks@ic.fbi.gov, robert.clifford@ic.fbi.gov, mary.warren@ic.fbi.gov, frank.teixeira@ic.fbi.gov, timothy.langan@ic.fbi.gov, sharon.kuo@ic.fbi.gov, kingman.wong@ic.fbi.gov, daniel.bodony@ic.fbi.gov, christopher.mcmurray@ic.fbi.gov, ralph.hope@ic.fbi.gov, eric.metz@ic.fbi.gov, alejandro.barbeito@ic.fbi.gov, cary.gleicher@ic.fbi.gov, paul.haertel@ic.fbi.gov, greg.cox@ic.fbi.gov, lazaro.andino@ic.fbi.gov, gabriel.ramirez@ic.fbi.gov, tom.sobocinski@ic.fbi.gov, benjamin.walker@ic.fbi.gov, kirk.striebich@ic.fbi.gov, gregory.cox@ic.fbi.gov, katherine.andrews@ic.fbi.gov, carolyn.willson@ic.fbi.gov, mark.nowak@ic.fbi.gov, stuart.wirtz@ic.fbi.gov, lesley.buckler@ic.fbi.gov, daniel.dudzinski@ic.fbi.gov, william.peterson@ic.fbi.gov, connally.brown@ic.fbi.gov, leo.navarette@ic.fbi.gov, lawrence.futa@ic.fbi.gov, gregory.shaffer@ic.fbi.gov, daniel.clegg@ic.fbi.gov, adishaggarwala@yahoo.com, adishaggarwala@hotmail.com, vsondhi@luthra.com, muraritiwari.adv@gmail.com, Priyanka Tyagi <adv.priyankatyagi@gmail.com>, sarlakaushik@yahoo.com, goswamiandassociates@yahoo.co.in, vedbaldev@rediffmail.com, rakeshtikuadvocate@yahoo.com, kkmanan <kkmanan@rediffmail.com>, ars.chauhan.co@gmail.com, Rajiv Khosla <advrajivkhosla@gmail.com>, rakeshkochar@hotmail.com, khatri.surya@hotmail.com, puneet mittal <puneetmittal9@gmail.com>, "advamit.sharma@gmail.com" <advamit.sharma@gmail.com>, Attorneynitin@yahoo.com, Rajesh Mishra <attorney.rmishra@gmail.com>, jaibirnagar@gmail.com, csrhw@csrhw.com.cn, cnriec@chinacnr.com, deepak verma <justicedverma@gmail.com>, dridzu@nic.in, Om Prakash <oplawassociates@gmail.com>, Jatan Singh <jatan_singh@yahoo.com>, Abhijat Bal <abhijat.bal@gmail.com>, asutosh lohia <lasutosh@gmail.com>, Vikram Singh Panwar <vikrampanwar2010@gmail.com>, ashok.bhasin@yahoo.co.in, Aruna Tiku <arunatikuadvocate@yahoo.com>, Sunil Mittal <sunilmittaladvocate@gmail.com>, Meghna Sankhla <meghna@sankhla.in>, Amit Sharma with khosla <advocateas@gmail.com>, Pankaj Kapoor <lawyerpankaj@gmail.com>, "P.H. Parekh" <pravin.parekh@pravinparekh.com>, rakesh.sherawat@yahoo.com, jagdev_advocate@yahoo.com, abhay kumar verma <akvadvocates@gmail.com>, Manan Mishra <manankumarmishra@gmail.com>, ZAFAR AHMED Khan <zakhan52@gmail.com>, anirveda_04@sifymail.com, prabakaran.president.tnaa@gmail.com, vbhatt.adv@gmail.com, faisalrizvi@hotmail.com, advajithts@gmail.com, n_ramchanderrao@yahoo.com, Nilesh Kumar <agrnilesh73@gmail.com>, kunals777@yahoo.com, chairman@ses-surat.org, bhojcthakur@yahoo.com, raj mohan singh tanwar <rmsinghadvocate@gmail.com>, Rohinton Nariman <rohintonnariman@gmail.com>, Satish Abarao Deshmukh <satish.adeshmukh@gmail.com>, info@group30.org, poststelle@sta.berlin.de, public.enquiries@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk, webmaster.greco@coe.int, info@eurojust.europa.eu, poststelle@generalbundesanwalt.de, jthuy@eurojust.europa.eu, ejn@eurojust.europa.eu, collegesecretariat@eurojust.europa.eu, poststelle@bgh.bund.de, secretariat@cepol.europa.eu, CP@ohchr.org, siemens-ombudsmann@rae13.de, mariassy@rae13.de, usgrievance@rb.nic.in, cenvigil@nic.in, sdas@cbi.gov.in, adrkd@cbi.gov.in, jdp@cbi.gov.in, hozeo@cbi.gov.in, hozmdma@cbi.gov.in, hozbpl@cbi.gov.in, hozmum1@cbi.gov.in, hozkol@cbi.gov.in, hozac@cbi.gov.in, hozstf@cbi.gov.in, hozsc@cbi.gov.in, hozbsf@cbi.gov.in, hozpat@cbi.gov.in, hozeo2@cbi.gov.in, jda@cbi.gov.in, jdtfc@cbi.gov.in, hozdel@cbi.gov.in, hozchn@cbi.gov.in, hozhyd@cbi.gov.in, hozne@cbi.gov.in, dop@cbi.gov.in, hobac1del@cbi.gov.in, hobac2del@cbi.gov.in, hobac3del@cbi.gov.in, rajiv.vc@nic.in, rajeev.verma@nic.in, "cp.ggn@hry.nic.in" <cp.ggn@hry.nic.in>, mukul17855@yahoo.com, Ranjit Kumar <sgofficerk@gmail.com>, lnageshwararao@hotmail.com, tusharmehta64@yahoo.com, neerajkishankaul@gmail.com, Narasimha Pamidighantam <psnarasimha@gmail.com>, naqvimukhtar@yahoo.com, cpthakur1@rediffmail.com, Jual Oram <oram.jual@gmail.com>, jualoram@rediffmail.com, SS Ahluwalia <tengrg@gmail.com>, ssa@10grg.com, Balbir Punj <punjbalbir@gmail.com>, bkpunj@gmail.com, maliksatyapal@hotmail.com, prabhatjhabjp@gmail.com, vijaya_999@ymail.com, laxmi_chawla@yahoo.com, Kiran Maheshwari <saikiran.udr@gmail.com>, ananth@ananth.org, "T. C. Gehlot" <mptcgehlot@gmail.com>, mp.tcgehlot@bjp.org, jpnadda@gmail.com, Dharmendra Pradhan <dpdharmendrapradhan@gmail.com>, d.pradhan@sansad.nic.in, Tapir Gao <gaotapir@yahoo.com>, fvg001@gmail.com, Anand Chaudhary <anandchaudhary2009@gmail.com>, rudypr@rediffmail.com, p.muralidharrao@rediffmail.com, ramji.bjp@gmail.com, Satish Velankar <shrivsatish@gmail.com>, saudan.singh@bjp.org, piyush@bjp.org, jshyam48@rediffmail.com, bhupender_advocate@rediffmail.com, Bhupender Yadav <bhupenderyadav69@gmail.com>, "P.K Krishnadas" <krishnadasbjp@gmail.com>, "Dr. Anil Jain" <aniljain.dr@gmail.com>, vinod.pandey@bjp.org, TRIVENDRA SINGH RAWAT <tsrawatbjp@gmail.com>, Rameshwar Chaurasia <rpcnokha@gmail.com>, arti_9@yahoo.co.in, vani_tripathi@yahoo.com, dr.sudhayadav@yahoo.co.in, Sudha Malaiya <malaiyasudha@gmail.com>, Poonam Mahajan R <pmahajanr@gmail.com>, drtamilisai@yahoo.co.in, lois.bjp@gmail.com, Arun Jain <bjparun.jain@gmail.com>, Arun Jain <arun.jain@bjp.org>, bjpinparliament@yahoo.com, "V. Shanmuganathan" <vsnathan7666@gmail.com>, PRAKASH JAVADEKAR <pjavadekar@gmail.com>, shahnawaz@sansad.nic.in, shahnawaz.hussain@bjp.org, Nirmala Sitharaman <nsitharaman@gmail.com>, "Dr. B S Shastri" <dr.bsshastri@gmail.com>, trivedi.sudhanshu@gmail.com, Meenakshi Lekhi <mrs.mlekhi@gmail.com>, Captain Abhimanyu <abhimanyu.bjp@gmail.com>, mjakbar@hotmail.com, president@bjp.org, ajaitley@sansad.nic.in, sushmaswaraj@hotmail.com, fmo@nic.in, cabinet@nic.in, cabinetsy@nic.in, kk manan <kkmananadvocate@gmail.com>, kkmanan@gmail.com, Usama Siddiqui <musiddiqui@gmail.com>, ranarajinder@ymail.com, secy-mci@nic.in, delhimedicalcouncil@gmail.com, sho-civilline-dl@nic.in, sho-kamlamkt-dl@nic.in, sho-gk-dl@nic.in, sho-chandnimahal-dl@nic.in, sho-ptstreet-dl@nic.in, sho-paharganj-dl@nic.in, sho-rkpuram-dl@nic.in, sho-bkroad-dl@nic.in, sho-chanakyapuri-dl@nic.in, sho-vasantvhr-dl@nic.in, sho-vksouth-dl@nic.in, sho-amarclny-dl@nic.in, sho-kmkpur-dl@nic.in, sho-hauzkhas-dl@nic.in, sho-safdarjung-dl@nic.in, sho-malviyangr-dl@nic.in, sho-saket-dl@nic.in, sho-lodhiclny-dl@nic.in, sho-dkuan-dl@nic.in, sho-kalkaji-dl@nic.in, sho-crpark-dl@nic.in, sho-govpuri-dl@nic.in, sho-ipestate-dl@nic.in, sho-mandirmarg-dl@nic.in, sho-kashmirigate-dl@nic.in, sho-rajinderngr-dl@nic.in, sho-karolbagh-dl@nic.in, sho-parsadngr-dl@nic.in, sho-bhrao-dl@nic.in, sho-sadarbazar-dl@nic.in, sho-jamamasjid-dl@nic.in, sho-daryaganj-dl@nic.in, sho-hauzqazi-dl@nic.in, sho-lahorigate-dl@nic.in, sho-anandparvat-dl@nic.in, sho-patelngr-dl@nic.in, sho-ranjitngr-dl@nic.in, sho-dbgrd-dl@nic.in, sho-sarairohilla-dl@nic.in, sho-punjabibagh-dl@nic.in, Rich Verma <rverma@steptoe.com>, jtcp.ggn@hry.nic.in, "dcphq.ggn@hry.nic.in" <dcphq.ggn@hry.nic.in>, "dcp.southggn@hry.nic.in" <dcp.southggn@hry.nic.in>, Mukul Rohatgi <mukul17855@gmail.com>, seclg@nic.in, Senator@mccain.senate.gov, suresh prabhu <spprabhu1@gmail.com>, rv.dhc@nic.in, drwrit.dhc@nic.in, rga.dhc@nic.in, arwrit.dhc@nic.in, Manpreet Lamba <manpreet.lamba@azbpartners.com>, "deepak@adlakha.com" <deepak@adlakha.com>, jawahar@pralaw.in, prem@pralaw.in, dgp-rj@nic.in, adgp-ats-rj@nic.in, adgpabn-rj@nic.in, Commandant 11 rac <comdt11rac_ir33@yahoo.co.in>, comdt8thbnracir@yahoo.co.in
Cc: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@gmail.com>, Seema Sapra <seemasapra@hotmail.com>

To the President of India Pranab Mukherjee, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court,

I reproduce below a copy of CM 428/2013 pending in WP Civil 1280/2012 since January 2013. It describes a conspiracy and attempt to murder me on 17 February 2012 before this writ petition was filed on which date I had mentioned before then Delhi High Court Acting Chief Justice A K Sikri and Judge Rajiv Sahai Endlaw in open court that my life was in danger and that I was being poisoned.

Judge A K Sikri, Judge Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and then DHCBA president A S Chandhiok participated in this conspiracy and attempt to eliminate me. If this attempt had succeeded, Writ Petition Civil 1280/2012 would not have been filed.

A copy of CM 428/2013 is also attached in pdf form below.

VOL-12 CM 428 of 2013 attempt to murder on 17 Feb 2012.pdf

I also point out that Judge A K Sikri and Judge Rajiv Sahai Endlaw had been hearing Prashant Bhushan's writ petition on the Air India scam involving purchase of Boeing aircraft with GE engines in 2012. They then corruptly dismissed that writ petition without directing inquiries in the Air India scam. That decision is now under challenge in a Special Leave Petition pending in the Supreme Court of India. Judge A K Sikri was thereafter appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court of India. Recently his brother Ravi Sikri was designated a senior advocate by the Delhi High Court.

Both Judge A K Sikri and Judge Rajiv Sahai Endlaw had already been approached by agents of General Electric Company/ Montek Singh Ahluwalia and they knowingly facilitated the conspiracy and attempt to murder me on 17 February 2012.

Both Judge A K Sikri and Judge Rajiv Sahai Endlaw must be impeached for participating in the conspiracy and attempt to murder me on 17 February 2012.

There is clearly a threat to my life also from elements within the Indian State including Judge A K Sikri of the Supreme Court of India, and Delhi High Court Judges - Judge Rajiv Sahai Endlaw & Judge Gita Mittal. These judges now have an independent motive to destroy me because I have exposed their corrupt and criminal acts.

Ravi Sikri and lawyers close to Judge A K Sikri like Sanjeev Sindhwani are involved in having me targeted and poisoned on Delhi High Court premises. Judge A K Sikri's wife (Madhu Sikri), son and daughter in law are also lawyers and are also procuring my being targeted.

Meanwhile I continue to be poisoned with poisonous chemical fumes and gases which are being released into my immediate environment.

Seema Sapra

In the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi

Civil Writ Jurisdiction

C.M. Appl. No. 428 of 2013

Writ Petition No. 1280 of 2012

IN THE MATTER OF:

Seema Sapra …Petitioner

versus

General Electric Co. and Others ….Respondents

URGENT APPLICATION

The Registrar

Delhi High Court

New Delhi

Sir,

The ground of urgency is that urgent directions are sought regarding investigation into the conspiracy and attempt to murder the petitioner on February 17, 2012 so that the petitioner can be appropriately protected. Kindly list this application before court on 16 January 2013

Place: New Delhi Petitioner in Person

January 10, 2013 Seema Sapra

Formerly resident at G 4, First Floor, Jangpura Extension New Delhi 110014, Presently homeless after illegal eviction on May 30, 2012 in contempt of this Hon'ble Court's order dated May 25, 2012 and temporarily residing at Tashi Delek House, at Majnu Ka Tila

COURT FEES

In the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi

Civil Writ Jurisdiction

C.M. Appl. No. 428 of 2013

Writ Petition No. 1280 of 2012

IN THE MATTER OF:

Seema Sapra …Petitioner

Versus

General Electric Co. and Others ….Respondents

AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 151, CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSPIRACY AND ATTEMPT TO MURDER THE PETITIONER ON FEBRUARY 17, 2012 ALONG WITH AFFIDAVIT

The Petitioner above named

Most Respectfully Showeth:

1. The present application seeks to place before this court the facts and circumstances regarding one of several attempts to eliminate the petitioner. The conspiracy and attempt to murder the petitioner that is the subject matter of this application took place on February 17, 2012 and in the weekend and days immediately following. The conspiracy and attempt to murder the petitioner on February 17, 2012 is significant because it took place immediately before the petitioner filed this writ petition in court and because it took place at a time when the petitioner's imminent intent to file the present petition was publicly known. The conspiracy and attempt to murder the petitioner on February 17, 2012 is also significant because the high offices of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court and the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) of the Government of India and the office of the president of the Bar Association for the High Court of Delhi were sought to be used in a brazen conspiracy and attempt to murder the petitioner before her petition could be filed in court. The conspiracy and attempt to murder the petitioner on February 17, 2012 is also significant because it establishes that the threat/ danger to the life of the petitioner on account of exposing General Electric corruption, fraud, forgery and bribery in high-value Railway Ministry tenders involves powerful and influential lawyers with access within the judiciary itself.

2. The facts and circumstances of the conspiracy and attempt to murder the petitioner on February 17, 2012 can be gleaned from several communications that the petitioner sent on this subject to the office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court to which the petitioner did not receive any response. These communications are set out hereinafter in chronological order. The petitioner states that the contents of these communications set out below are true and correct to her knowledge. The petitioner states that the contents of the letters reproduced below be read as part of the statements made under oath by the petitioner and as part of the present application duly verified by a sworn affidavit.

3. The petitioner handed over three handwritten letters to the office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court on February 17, 2012 itself. Copies of these three letters are annexed hereto as Annexure P-1.

4. The petitioner handed over two letters to the office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court on March 14, 2012. Copies of these two letters dated March 14, 2012 are already on record in this matter. Typed copies of these two letters are also reproduced below.

"March 14, 2012

Hon'ble Justice A K Sikri

Acting Chief Justice

Delhi High Court

New Delhi

Dear Sir,

I am a practicing advocate and the petitioner-in-person in a whistleblower petition (CWP 1280/ 2012) pending in the Delhi High Court against corruption, forgery and fraud by General Electric Co. and its subsidiaries in connection with two multi-billion dollar Indian Railways tenders to set up electric and diesel locomotive factories.

I mentioned the matter of the threat to my life before you on February 17, 2012 in Court No. 1. On Mr. A S Chandhiok's suggestion you asked me to visit the Delhi High Court health centre on February 17, 2012.

The threat is to eliminate the Petitioner in a covert way. Doctors at Max and Apollo were used to cover up the Petitioner's symptoms and to endanger her life. Even cardiac related symptoms were not treated with the requisite care and medical responsibility. Doctors have lied to the Petitioner about her symptoms and their implications for her health. Her diagnostic reports and prescriptions have been falsified. Harmful prescriptions have been written out for her. The petitioner has had to resort to getting tests and diagnostic procedures performed under assumed names in order to obtain accurate results. The Petitioner is being followed and doctors/ labs she visits are being spoken to.

On the suggestion of the Bench and on Mr. A.S. Chandhiok's urging, the Petitioner visited the Delhi High Court Health Center on February 17, 2012. The Petitioner states that the Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Baldev Singh had been spoken to and he falsified the petitioner's blood pressure readings and prescribed medication on a single falsified high reading. He lied and told the petitioner that her complaint of breathlessness was on account of high blood pressure. This is a medical falsehood.

He also prescribed Alprax and when the petitioner stated she did not need this, he first lied and said that this was for blood pressure. The Petitioner challenged him by stating that Alprax was for anxiety. Dr. Baldev Singh then lied and said that this would help the blood pressure as that was related to anxiety. This is also wrong. (Dr. Baldev Singh's falsified reading of 180/100 can not be medically explained as caused by anxiety.)

The Petitioner said she did not need alprax and that she did not want to consult Dr. Baldev Singh. He then struck it out and said the Petitioner could leave it out. The Petitioner told Dr. Baldev Singh that she did not want his advice and left. The petitioner had several blood pressure readings taken in the days thereafter including one the same evening and all readings were within normal range. Dr. Baldev Singh intentionally took a false high reading, and then attempted to mislead the Petitioner as to the cause of her complaint of breathlessness. He wrote out an unnecessary and therefore harmful prescription for high blood pressure medication.

Dr. Baldev told the Petitioner to take the alprax at night. Prescribing Alprax at night (which is like a sleeping pill) to someone who lives alone and is complaining of poisoning, including poisoning by inhalation and consequent breathlessness would be very dangerous and could prove fatal as this would prevent the natural response of the patient to wake up in case of breathlessness or in case of exposure to a toxic gas or chemical fumes. The Petitioner states that by prescribing alprax and by misleading the Petitioner as described above, Dr. Baldev Singh intended to cause harm to the Petitioner and to endanger her life.

I attach my handwritten letters addressed to you dated February 17, 2012. I also attach blood pressure readings taken subsequently which show that my blood pressure was normal and that Dr. Baldev Singh intentionally falsified the reading on February 17, 2012.

I request that the Delhi High Court take appropriate action against Dr. Baldev Singh. I have filed a sworn affidavit on the complaint against Dr. Baldev Singh in CWP 1280/ 2012.

I also bring to your notice that attempts were made to drug/ poison me on Delhi Court premises in the days pre-ceding March 4, 2012. I attach a complaint made to the Police in this regard on March 4, 2012. The food in question was consumed in stall No. 3 in the Delhi High Court and tea consumed in the Bar Association canteen.

I request that the Delhi High Court take appropriate action on attempts to drug/ poison me on the premises of the Court.

Yours faithfully,

Seema Sapra

G 4 first floor

Jangpura Extension

New Delhi 110014"

"March 14, 2012

Hon'ble Justice A K Sikri

Acting Chief Justice

Delhi High Court

New Delhi

Dear Sir,

CWP 1280/ 2012 is pending before Justice Hima Kohli. On March 5, 2012 the Petitioner applied to Justice Hima Kohli to recuse herself from hearing this matter for reasons the petitioner has set out in sworn affidavits dated March 3, March 5 and March 7, 2012 filed in CWP 1280/ 2012.

On March 7, 2012, Justice Hima Kohli refused to recuse herself from the matter. The Petitioner reaffirms, reiterates and stands by all her statements in the affidavits dated March 3, March 5 and March 7, 2012 filed in CWP 1280/ 2012 and has no confidence that Justice Hima Kohli will hear her petition without bias, malafides or spite against the Petitioner.

As justice must not only be done but also be seen to be done, the Petitioner prays that CWP 1280/ 2012 be transferred from Justice Hima Kohli and posted before another Judge.

The Petitioner is filing another affidavit in response to Justice Hima Kohli's order dated March 7, 2012 in CWP 1280/ 2012.

The Petitioner's life is in grave danger and she is being harmed daily as well as being harassed and intimidated. It is imperative that her matter be heard expeditiously and fairly in accordance with law.

Yours faithfully,

Seema Sapra

G 4 first floor

Jangpura Extension

New Delhi 110014"

5. The petitioner handed over two letters to the office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court on March 20, 2012. Copies of these two letters dated March 20, 2012 are already on record in this matter. Typed copies of these two letters are also reproduced below.

"March 20, 2012

Hon'ble Justice A K Sikri

Acting Chief Justice

Delhi High Court

New Delhi

Dear Sir,

I am writing further to my letter dated March 14, 2012 wherein I had requested that the Delhi High Court take action against Dr. Baldev Singh, Chief Medical Officer of the Delhi High Court Health Center for endangering my life. I had also requested that the Court take action on my police complaints that attempts were made to drug/ poison me on the Delhi High Court premises around March 4, 2012.

I state that Dr. Baldev Singh's harmful prescription written out on 17 February 2012 was a planned attempt on my life. Dr. Baldev Singh should be disbarred from medical practice and an FIR registered against him for conspiracy and attempt to murder.

I had recently started going to the Delhi High court regularly. I had yet to file a petition. On 17 February, I mentioned the threat faced by me to the Acting CJ before lunch. He asked me to return after lunch. He summoned the standing counsel for Delhi Police.

After lunch, the acting CJ asked the proxy who appeared for the standing counsel, Delhi Police to look into my complaint. I attempted to hand over a written note but the Acting CJ asked me to give it to the Delhi police lawyer. The Acting CJ then told me to go to the Delhi High Court health centre for any immediate medical treatment needed and for further tests. I had stated in Court that I wanted to undergo full toxicology tests for poisoning including for exposure to toxic inhalants/ gases/ fumes.

When I was addressing the court, Mr. A.S. Chandhiok intervened and said he had written to the Police Commissioner last year after I had sent a detailed letter with supporting documents for Mr. Chandhiok asking him to intervene and help me in his capacity as President of the DHCBA. Mr. Chandhiok also stated that I was complaining "that there is something in her house" and he said in court that "we will look into that also".

After I sat down in court, Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, ASG urged me to immediately go to the Delhi HC health center. He asked a junior lawyer working with him Ms. Shweta Gupta to accompany me. A court official wanted to come along but Mr. Chandhiok's junior said she was accompanying me.

I went to the Delhi HC health center. Two doctors on duty sent me to the CMO for authorization after I told them that I had complained of poisoning and needed toxicology tests.

I went to the CMO, Dr. Baldev Singh. Dr. Baldev Singh examined me himself and mentioned I could get tests done either at the health centre or at some external lab. He asked me what immediate symptoms I had. I said breathlessness and shortness of breath.

Dr. Baldev Singh then falsified my blood pressure reading as 180/ 100 and prescribed Eslo AT (s-amlodipine) which is a calcium channel blocker and alprax which he told me to take at night.

Since I am not hypertensive, Dr. Baldev Singh's prescription was dangerous and could have proven fatal if I had followed it. Instead I got my blood pressure checked subsequently and it was normal.

(My subsequent blood pressure readings were: 136/90 at around 5.45 pm on February 17, 2012; 135/100 in the afternoon of February 18, 2012; 130/90 at 6:40 pm on February 18, 2012; 130/90 on February 20, 2012; and 134/90 on February 24, 2012)

Dr. Baldev Singh intentionally falsified my blood pressure reading and then prescribed a medicine which he knew could be fatal.

A determination of high BP cannot be made from a single reading. Plus, prescribing a dangerous drug like a calcium channel blocker which is known to cause hypotension and heart failure would not usually be prescribed in the first instance. Other drugs for high BP would be tried first.

I am certain my BP was normal on February 17, 2012 even when I met Dr. Baldev Singh. I was in court and was feeling well except for respiratory symptoms on exertion.

Even assuming the reading was 180/100, even then Dr. Baldev Singh's advice was wrong and dangerous. A BP reading of 180/100 would require emergency care. A prescription of ESLO AT for five days does not make sense. No doctor would use a single reading to prescribe a calcium channel blocker.

And given that my blood pressure was normal, taking ESLO AT for five days could have caused dangerous hypotension or heart failure.

After I mentioned the threat to my life to the CJ before lunch on February 17, 2012, a lawyer named Anupam Tripathi who I do not know sat behind me in Court No. 1 during the lunch break and asked me if I intended to give a written letter to the CJ. I said I would. This lawyer kept pestering me and trying to talk to me about what I intended to do. He kept telling me he was concerned for me because I sounded so "stressed'. I did not wish to discuss the matter with him and told him to go read my online blogs where I had posted information about my whistle-blower complaints against General Electric.

The Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Baldev Singh had been spoken to and he falsified my blood pressure readings and prescribed medication on a single falsified high reading. He lied and told me that my complaint of breathlessness was on account of high blood pressure. This is a medical falsehood.

He also prescribed Alprax and when I stated that I did not need this, he first lied and said that this was for blood pressure. I challenged him by stating that Alprax was for anxiety. Dr. Baldev Singh then lied and said that this would help the blood pressure as that was related to anxiety. This is also wrong. (Dr. Baldev Singh's falsified reading of 180/100 can not be medically explained as caused by anxiety.)

His prescription for alprax at bedtime was also intended to endanger my life as I was complaining then of breathlessness at night and of being intentionally exposed to toxic gases.

I said I did not need alprax and that I did not want to consult Dr. Baldev Singh. Dr. Baldev Singh then struck it out and said I could leave it out. I told Dr. Baldev Singh that I did not want his advice and left.

I had several blood pressure readings taken in the days thereafter including one the same evening and all readings were within normal range. Dr. Baldev Singh intentionally took a false high reading, and then attempted to mislead me as to the cause of my complaint of breathlessness. He wrote out an unnecessary and therefore extremely harmful prescription for high blood pressure medication.

Dr. Baldev told me to take the alprax at night. Prescribing Alprax at night (which is like a sleeping pill) to someone who lives alone and is complaining of poisoning, including poisoning by inhalation and consequent breathlessness would be very dangerous and could prove fatal as this would prevent the natural response of the person to wake up in case of breathlessness or in case of exposure to a toxic gas or chemical fumes. By prescribing alprax and by misleading me as described above, Dr. Baldev Singh intended to cause me harm and to endanger my life.

When I mentioned the threat to my life before the Acting CJ on February 17, 2012 and stated that I was being poisoned and was not able to get medical treatment, I was initially surprised at the suggestion of the Judge and Mr. A. S. Chandhiok, ASJ that I go to the Delhi High Court health center. I agreed to go because I thought I might get help as the CJ was sending me there. But the suggestion coming from both the Acting CJ and the ASG was strange and unusual. The Delhi High Court health center is neither equipped nor staffed to deal with complaints of poisoning. A person complaining of poisoning would not normally be sent to a facility like the Delhi High Court health center. I also point out that I was sent there on verbal directions by the CJ and not on a written order. A complaint of poisoning should have been dealt with as a medico-legal case.

I point out that I had not filed a petition in court against GE on February 17, 2012.

When I was in Court on February 17, 2012 several attempts were made to get me to leave the court premises. I have complained about these and attach these complaints as Annexure A hereto.

Dr. Baldev Singh of the Delhi High Court health center intentionally sought to endanger my life as part of the conspiracy to eliminate me.

Let me set out the scenario if I had blindly followed Dr. Baldev Singh's prescription:

If I had followed Dr. Baldev Singh's prescription and taken the calcium channel blocker and alprax, I could have fallen ill or even died because of a complication like hypotension or heart failure.

If I had left the court on February 17, 2012 in response to the urgent messages set out in Annexure A, I would not have recorded the threat to my life in writing in hand-written letters given to the CJ.

The last interaction with a doctor (Dr. Baldev Singh) would have falsely shown that my BP was as high as 180/ 100 and my death even if intentionally caused by exposing me to toxins/ poison could easily have been accounted for as having resulted from this (false) hypertensive emergency.

There would have been no petition in the High Court. I point out that the Delhi High Court was shut for three days after February 17, 2012.

I also state that after returning from the Delhi High Court health centre, I again mentioned the matter before the Hon'ble Acting Chief Justice and pointed out Dr, Baldev Singh's inappropriate conduct. I also asked if Mr. Chandiok would get himself treated in the Delhi High Court health centre which is a very basic facility as he had urged me to go there.

I state that I spoke with Mr. A. S. Chandhiok and Ms. Laxmi Chauhan in Court No. 1 later on February 17, 2012 and Mr. Chandhiok then told me that he was ready to get me treated at any hospital and by any doctor of my choice.

My writ petition filed in this Court has been marked by the Union of India to Mr. Chandhiok and he has been appointed Senior Counsel in the matter. However, Mr, Chandhiok did not appear in my matter even on a single occasion despite my two petitions having coming up for hearing five times on 23 and 27 February and on 3, 5 and 7 March 2012.

I also point out another suspicious circumstance. An acquaintance of mine Ms. Eva Tiemann who I had previously asked not to contact me on January 21 2012 was made to send me a text message late in the evening of February 17, 2012 asking me if I wanted to meet her for a drink. I did not reply and sent her a message not to contact me. Ms. Tiemann was used against me earlier and that was the reason I asked her not to contact me.

Seema Sapra

Annexure A

---------- Forwarded message----------

From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>

Date: Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM

Subject: Threat to life on account of whistle-blower complaints in CWP 1280/ 2012 in Delhi High Court against General Electric in connection with Indian Railways tenders for diesel and electric locomotive factories

To: sonali.vatsa@maxhealthcare.com, garima.singh@maxhealthcare.com

Cc: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@gmail.com>, bk gupta <bk.gupta@nic.in>,cvc@nic.in, john.flannery@ge.com, jeffrey.immelt@ge.com, "Denniston, Brackett (GE, Corporate)" <brackett.denniston@ge.com>, "Chesley, John" <JChesley@gibsondunn.com>, "Warin, F. Joseph" <fwarin@gibsondunn.com>, pmosb@pmo.nic.in,tka.nair@pmo.nic.in, jmg.vc@nic.in, r.sri_kumar@nic.in, dcp-caw-dl@nic.in,dcp-pcr-dl@nic.in, dcp-south-dl@nic.in, dcp-central-dl@nic.in,dcp-newdelhi-dl@nic.in, dcp-crime-dl@nic.in, hm@nic.in, hshso@nic.in,ncw@nic.in, complaintcell-ncw@nic.in, sgnhrc@nic.in, dg-nhrc@nic.in, ffetf@usdoj.gov,chairmanoffice@sec.gov, help@sec.gov, fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov, askdoj@usdoj.gov,jtcpsr@gmail.com, dch@nic.in, g.haldea@nic.in, mr@rb.railnet.gov.in,crb@rb.railnet.gov.in, splcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in, splcp-admin-dl@nic.in,splcp-security-dl@nic.in, KolkataPAS@state.gov, chennaic@state.gov,webmastermumbai@state.gov, HyderabadPA@state.gov, HydACS@state.gov,HydFPU@state.gov, MumbaiACS@state.gov, mumbai_visa_fraud@state.gov,ConsularNewdel@state.gov, chennaiaf@state.gov, chennaiatt@state.gov, NDwebmail@state.gov,acsnd@state.gov, oighotline@state.gov, humanrights@americanbar.org,cpr@americanbar.org, ethicsearch@americanbar.org,Peter.Koelling@americanbar.org, hrwpress@hrw.org, blatche@hrw.org,berlin@hrw.org, paris@hrw.org, brussels@transparency.org, ti@transparency.org,cswardt@transparency.org, mmarschall@transparency.org,czellmann@transparency.org, contact@whistleblowers.org, jtcp-phq1-dl@nic.in,dcpsed@gmail.com, CleggD1@state.gov, "Eglash, Jeffrey C (GE, Corporate)" <jeffrey.eglash@ge.com>, james.winget@ge.com, "Dimitrief, Alexander (GE, Corporate)"<alexander.dimitrief@ge.com>, "Plimpton, Tara (GE Infra, Transportation, US)" <tara.plimpton@ge.com>,Directors@corporate.ge.com, rjs22@cornell.edu, john.krenicki@ge.com,brian.worrell@ge.com, mark.vachon@ge.com, keith.sherin@ge.com,john.samuels@ge.com, michael.neal@ge.com, susan.peters@ge.com,puneet.mahajan@ge.com, shane.fitzsimons@ge.com, pamela.daley@ge.com,beth.comstock@ge.com, charlene.begley@ge.com, mark.begor@ge.com,steve.bolze@ge.com, Jeffrey.Bornstein@ge.com, john.dineen@ge.com,tom.gentile@ge.com, dan.henson@ge.com, jay.ireland@ge.com, daniel.janki@ge.com,david.joyce@ge.com, jamie.miller@ge.com, lorenzo.simonelli@ge.com,dmitri.stockton@ge.com, terri.bresenham@ge.com, anish.shah@ge.com,kishore.jayaraman@ge.com, vishal.wanchoo@ge.com, john.rice@ge.com,rita.purohit@ge.com, nancy.anderson@ge.com, rob.mckeel@ge.com,joel.berdine@ge.com, tina.donikowski@ge.com, eric.ducharme@ge.com,marcia.fish@ge.com, tammy.gromacki@ge.com, stephan.koller@ge.com,guilherme.mello@ge.com, monish.patolawala@ge.com, tim.schweikert@ge.com,russell.stokes@ge.com, peter.thomas@ge.com, david.tucker@ge.com,cyrille.petit@ge.com, joseph.noga@ge.com, janine.dascenzo@ge.com,carey.greiner@ge.com, david.wheeler@ge.com, Janice.baker@ge.com,ross.wright@ge.com, happy.perkins@ge.com, kathleen.bardell@ge.com,curtis.doster@ge.com, carol.terry@ge.com, victoria.lazar@ge.com,jen.riley@ge.com, varun.tejpal@ge.com, amarjyoti.barua@ge.com,david.lobo@ge.com, shruti.narang@ge.com, rajneesh.jaswal@ge.com,chandan.jain@ge.com, manish.batra@ge.com, deepak.doegar@ge.com,nitin.garg@ge.com, abhinav.kapoor@ge.com, prakash.chandra@ge.com

Dr. Sonali Vatsa,

I refer to your email below dated February 17, 2012 wherein you wrote that Max hospital would send me a response on my various complaints within 15 days. I have not received any response even though twenty five days have elapsed.

I point out that your emails of February 17, 2012 insisting that I reply the same day were sent at someone's directions who knew that I was in Court on February 17 and had mentioned the matter before the Acting Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court. There were other attempts that day to remove me from Court. Your emails were such an attempt as well. This establishes that the conspiracy to eliminate me is a planned operation with the masterminds having full knowledge of what I am doing. This also establishes that you were acting on the directions of someone who wanted me to leave court on February 17 without giving a written note to the Judge and who wanted to prevent me from drafting and filing a writ petition during the following weekend.

Could you state who asked you to send me those emails on February 17, 2012?

I sent an email reopening my complaints against Max to you and Dr. Varun Katyal on January 12, 2012.

I sent further emails to you and to Dr. Garima Singh on January 31 and February 7, 2012.

Seema Sapra

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:16 PM, <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:

I need more time. I can send this to you by end of next week.

Meanwhile please email me images of the three chest Xrays done at Max in July and August 2011.

I also need a statement from Max in writing on whether the Xrays showed any congestion/ edema or fluid in the lungs.

Seema Sapra

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

________________________________________

From: Sonali Vatsa <sonali.vatsa@maxhealthcare.com>

Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:46:18 +0530

To: seema.sapra@gmail.com<seema.sapra@gmail.com>

Subject:RE: Re:

All right please let me know by Sunday the 19th of Feb.

Regards

Dr.Sonali Vatsa

From:seema.sapra@googlemail.com[mailto:seema.sapra@googlemail.com]

Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 3:37 PM

To: Sonali Vatsa; bk gupta; john.flannery@ge.com; Denniston, Brackett (GE, Corporate)

Cc: sdf

Subject: Re:

Dr. Vatsa,

This is in response to your email sent today afternoon. You state I should send all information by today. There is no way I can respond today. Kindly give me sufficient time to respond.

Seema Sapra

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

________________________________________

From:Sonali Vatsa <sonali.vatsa@maxhealthcare.com>

Date:Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:05:02 +0530

To:seema.sapra@googlemail.com<seema.sapra@googlemail.com>

Subject:

Dear Ms.Sapra

We are in receipt of your emails dated 13.2.2012,14.2.2012and 15.02.2012.We understand that you wish to reopen your complaints against Max doctors and the hospital.

In case you wish to give us more information ,request you to kindly mail the same to us by the end of day 17.02.2012.

Based on the information provided by you, we shall thereafter initiate a detailed review and respond to you within 15 working days.

Regards

Dr.Sonali Vatsa

Deputy Medical Superintendent

Max Superspeciality Hospital(West)

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>

Date: Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:22 AM

Subject: Re: Fw:

To: "john.flannery@ge.com" <john.flannery@ge.com>, "brackett.denniston@ge.com" <brackett.denniston@ge.com>, bk gupta <bk.gupta@nic.in>, "cvc@nic.in" <cvc@nic.in>, "pmosb@pmo.nic.in" <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, "dcp-central-dl@nic.in" <dcp-central-dl@nic.in>, "dcp-pcr-dl@nic.in" <dcp-pcr-dl@nic.in>, "dcpsed@gmail.com" <dcpsed@gmail.com>, "jtcpsr@gmail.com" <jtcpsr@gmail.com>, sdf<seema.sapra@gmail.com>, mohitchandmathur@hotmail.com,kirti_uppal@yahoo.com

Mr. B K Gupta,

As I have stated below, I mentioned the complaint of threat to life on account of corruption complaints against General Electric and Montek Singh Ahluwalia before Justice Sikri, Acting Chief Justice in the Delhi High Court on February 17, 2012. I mentioned the matter at 1.15 pm. The Hon'ble Judge asked me to reappear after lunch at 2.15 pm. The Hon'ble Judge did not sit until after 2.30 pm. I was in Court waiting.

I received 14 missed calls from Mrs Usha Sapra, my mother between 2.32 pm and 3.55 pm. I received one missed call from my sister Arti Sapra. I received 6 missed calls from my sister Puja Sapra between 2.46 pm and 4.11 pm. My phone was on silent. I finallynoticed the missed calls and called my mother at 3.55 pm. I was told that some furniture and belongings that were at my mother's house had been sent on a lorry to my house and unless I returned these would be left on the road. There was no prior intimation. This furniture had been in my mother's house since September - October 2011. I told my mother I was not home and was busy and could not get back.

I set out below text messages exchanged about this.

------ SMS ------

From: +919818097691

Received: Feb 17, 2012 3:13 PM

Subject: Your stuf from Nirvana Country is...

Your stuf from Nirvana Country is about to reach. Receive it or he will leave it there.

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

------ SMS ------

From: +919818097691

Received: Feb 17, 2012 3:47 PM

Subject: Your stuf from Nirvana Country has...

Your stuf from Nirvana Country has reached. He will leave it there. Since you are not there. He wil leave it on the road.

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

------ SMS ------

From: +919818097691

Received: Feb 17, 2012 3:52 PM

Subject: Your stuf is on the road.

Your stuf is on the road. The truck driver has called that he is leaving.

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

------ SMS ------

To: +919818089189

Sent: Feb 17, 2012 4:04 PM

Subject: I am in court and busy.

I am in court and busy. I will be home late.

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

------ SMS ------

To: +919818089189

Sent: Feb 17, 2012 4:09 PM

Subject: Take the stuff back and next time...

Take the stuff back and next time first check with me before sending stuff on a lorry.

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

------ SMS ------

From: +919818089189

Received: Feb 17, 2012 4:12 PM

Subject: The lorry has already left...

The lorry has already left...your stuff is on the road

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

------ SMS ------

To: +919818089189

Sent: Feb 17, 2012 4:17 PM

Subject: Well it can stay there - I will...

Well it can stay there - I will ask the police to remove it tomorrow.

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

------ SMS ------

From: +919818089189

Received: Feb 17, 2012 5:30 PM

Subject: Your choice ...go and see

Your choice ...go and see

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

------ SMS ------

To: +919818089189

Sent: Feb 17, 2012 7:38 PM

Subject: You have blocked the entrance to...

You have blocked the entrance to my house. I cannot get in. Seema Sapra

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

My family was made to do this so that I would leave Court and not be able to reappear before the Judge after lunch as directed.

When I returned home at 7 pm, the furniture and other belongings were lying on the pavement. Some belongings were stacked on the staircase behind a locked gate. I could not open the gate and had to repeatedly call the Police. I was finally able to enter my house at 9 pm.

I have asked that the furniture left on the pavement be taken into custody as evidence of harassment in order to prevent me from approaching the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court. This furniture is lying on the pavement outside G 4, Jangpura Extension today as well i.e., February 19, 2012.

I ask that the police take cognizance of this complaint and take this evidence into custody.

Seema Sapra

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:

Mr. B K Gupta,

That someone in the Police/ intelligence is coordinating the attempt to eliminate me, and to harass and intimidate me is clear.

Yesterday while I was in Delhi High Court, my estranged family was used to harass me and attempt to get me to leave Court after lunch by threatening to dump my furniture on the pavement. I have already stated that my family is being blackmailed to assist in harming/ harassing me and a domestic violence complaint and child custody issue is being used against them.

I asked SI Sanjiv Kumar and SI Malkhan Singh yesterday to take the furniture in the pictures into custody as evidence of harassment. This was not done. Today I emailed you and others asking that this evidence be taken into custody.

Instead of doing that, Rita Mohan was made to call 100 (after my email) complaining that an unclaimed suitcase and other items were lying outside her house. There was no suitcase outside her house. (Why did Rita Mohan not complain to the Police about this furniture yesterday?) When the PCR team arrived, I heard Rita Mohan's daughter tell the Police that this furniture did not belong to them or to me and should be disposed off. I intervened and said this was my furniture and I had made a 100 call about it yesterday and had asked that it be taken into police custody as evidence of harassment. The attempt clearly was to get this furniture disposed off and to cover up the harassment.

The Police then tried to cover up by assigning another SI Premraj to attend Rita Mohan's call. Why not SI Malkhan Singh who came yesterday about the same furniture after my numerous calls and emails. I have clearly told SI Premraj today that this furniture belongs to me and cannot be disposed off. It needs to be taken into Police custody as evidence of harassment.

This furniture is valuable, contains my belongings and is evidence of harassment. I have asked the police to take this evidence into custody. The reason for the harassment was to get me to leave Court yesterday afternoon when I was mentioning my threat to life complaint to the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court.

This furniture cannot be left lying on the pavement. The Police needs to take it into custody.

Seema Sapra

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:

Mr. B K Gupta,

A few minutes ago a PCR response team arrived. I believe Dr. Rita Mohan complained that some unclaimed suitcase and other items were lying outside her house. This was an attempt to cover up the evidence.

I have told the PCR response team that this items in the attached photo belong to me and contain my belongings. I have complained that these were dumped on the pavement yesterday to harass me.

I have asked that the Police take this into custody as evidence. it cannot be disposed off because this belongs to me.

I have informed SI premraj about this right now who is outside my house. I have also informed HC Satish kumar and constable Jogender who are also outside my house now. I have also informed constable raj Singh and HC Bipin Kiro about this.

Seema Sapra

On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:

Mr. B K Gupta,

Last evening I returned home to find that someone has blocked the entrance to my house. I could not open the gate because of items stacked against it.

I called 100 nine times. I called Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Additional commissioner of Police 10 times. He disconnected my calls.

I called Mr. A. S. Chandhiok, ASG and president, DHCBA. He said he would speak to the SHO.

I called the SHO on his mobile 5 times.

Finally, a PCR response team (Yajvir Malik and HC Yasin Mohammad) arrived and HC Malkhan Singh arrived from the local Police post.

They removed the items placed inside the locked gate and the gate could be opened. The remaining items, two cupboards and a chest were lying on the pavement. I told SI Malkhan Singh and SI Sanjiv Kumar (in-charge Jangpura Police post) to take these items into police custody as evidence. They left these items on the pavement overnight and they are still lying there this morning.

The reason this happened was because I mentioned the threat to my life from General Electric and Montek Singh Ahluwalia before the Delhi High Court Chief Justice yesterday. I was in Court at 2.30 pm yesterday and my family was used to pressure me into leaving the Court by threatening to dump some furniture and other belongings on the road. I did not leave the Court and therefore this furniture was dumped on the pavement.

Last evening I was finally able to enter my home around 9 pm after being stuck outside for two hours. While I was stuck outside, my phone-calls and emails from my blackberry were being barred.

Please have the items lying on the roadside taken into police custody as evidence of harassment and of attempt to prevent me from approaching the Court for protection and judicial orders against General Electric and Montek Singh Ahluwalia.

Seema Sapa

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 7:18 PM, seema sapra <seemasapra@hotmail.com> wrote:

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

-----Original Message-----

From: seemasapra@hotmail.com

Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:47:15

To: bk gupta<bk.gupta@nic.in>

Reply-To: seemasapra@hotmail.com

Cc: sdf<seema.sapra@gmail.com>

I am unable to enter my house as the entrance has been blocked. Seema Sapra

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel"

'March 20, 2012

Hon'ble Justice A K Sikri

Acting Chief Justice

Delhi High Court

New Delhi

Dear Sir,

I have by letter dated March 14, 2012 (copy enclosed) requested that CWP 1280/ 2012 be transferred from Justice Hima Kohli and be posted before another Judge.

I met Mr. Suri from the Chief Justice's Secretariat yesterday to inquire about the outcome of my letter to you. Mr. Suri has told me to provide the affidavits filed by me in CWP 1280/ 2012. I requested that the Chief Justice's secretariat call for the file to see the affidavits.

However, Mr. Suri asked me to provide the affidavits with another letter. I therefore attach affidavits dated March 16 2012, March 3, 2012, March 5 2012 (two affidavits) and March 7, 2012.

I request that the petition be transferred to another Judge in the interest of justice. I have no confidence that Justice Hima Kohli will hear my petition without bias, malafides or spite.

Yours faithfully,

Seema Sapra

G 4 first floor

Jangpura Extension

New Delhi 110014

Enclosures:

1.Affidavits dated March 16 2012, March 3, 2012, March 5 2012 (two affidavits) and March 7, 2012 filed by petitioner in CWP 1280/2012 in the Delhi High Court

2. Letter dated March 14, 2012 to Acting Chief Justice, Delhi High Court"

6. The petitioner handed over one letter to the office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court on March 22, 2012. A copy of this letter dated March 22, 2012 is already on record in this matter. A typed copy of this letter is also reproduced below.

"March 22, 2012

Hon'ble Justice Mr. A K Sikri

Acting Chief Justice

Delhi High Court

New Delhi

Dear Sir,

I have written to you on March 14 and March 2012 requesting that the Delhi High Court take action against the Chief Medical Officer of the Delhi High Court Health Center for intentionally attempting to endanger my life and harm me.

In both letters dated March 14 and March 20 2012, I mistakenly referred to the said CMO as Dr. Baldev Singh. I would like to correct that mistake and point out that the name of the CMO is Dr. K. G. S. Bansal. I had in my handwritten letters to you dated February 17, 2012 stated that I was examined by the CMO Dr. Bansal. I also state that Dr. K. G. S. Bansal does not usually examine patients at the Delhi High Court Health Centre and his job profile as CMO is administrative in nature.

I request that my complaints be looked into.

I have also requested by letters dated March 14 and March 20, 2012 that my whistle-blower and right to life (Article 21) petition – Civil Writ Petition 1280 of 2012 be transferred from Justice Hima Kohli and be heard by another Bench.

I also state that Mr. A. S. Chandhiok could not have written to the Police Commissioner about my complaint of threat to life as stated by him in Court No. 1 on February 17, 2012. I was assaulted and physically dragged from Police headquarters on August 27, 2011 when I went there seeking protection and medical treatment on account of poisoning. I request that Mr. A.S. Chandhiok be asked to produce this letter so as to be certain that he did not mislead the Court.

The police including the local SHO and the Jangpura police post in-charge are involved in the attempts on my life and in ongoing intimidation and harassment. They are also simultaneously engaged in a cover-up and facilitation of the attacks against me. The Joint Commissioner, Additional Commissioner and their subordinates are in the know about how I am being harmed and threatened but have failed to protect me.

Mr. Chandhiok's offer of February 17, 2011 to get me tested at any hospital of my choice was neither genuine nor well-intended. The intention was to cover-up my complaints ands symptoms of poisoning. Mr. Chandhiok has not even sat down with me for five minutes to inquire into how I am being harmed. He intentionally did not appear in Court when my matter was listed on 23 and 27 February 2012 and on 2, 5 and 7 March 2012.

Other members of the Delhi High Court Bar Association like Mr. J P Singh were also rude and aggressive when I requested that they listen to me about how I am being harmed.

Lawyers were used to spread false and malicious rumours about me in the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court.

Since there is a grave threat to my life, and I am being intentionally exposed to toxic substances which are being introduced into my home and car, and since I am being harassed, intimidated and gang-stalked daily with the involvement and misuse of the police and intelligence agencies, I request that my application for transfer of CWP 1280/ 2012 be decided on an urgent basis. I have been poisoned, gassed and drugged over the last year and a half. I also fear that I might be drugged or poisoned again to incapacitate me and prevent me from pursuing CWP 1280/ 2012.

Yours faithfully,

Seema Sapra

G 4 first floor

Jangpura Extension

New Delhi 110014"

7. The petitioner handed over one letter to the office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court on April 16, 2012. A copy of this letter dated April 16, 2012 is already on record in this matter. A typed copy of this letter is also reproduced below.

"April 16, 2012

Hon'ble Justice Mr. A K Sikri

Acting Chief Justice

Delhi High Court

New Delhi

Dear Sir,

I am writing to follow up on letters to you dated February 17, 2012 (three letters); March 14, 2012 (two letters); March 20, 2012 (two letters); and March 22, 2012 (one letter). Some of these letters enclosed supporting documents.

In these letters, I brought to your attention the following three issues and made requests for appropriate action to be taken by the Court:

1. Prayer to transfer Civil Writ Petition 1280 of 2012 from J. Hima Kohli to another Bench.

2. Request that the Court direct an investigation and registration of an FIR into my complaint against Dr. K.G.S. Bansal, Chief Medical Officer of the Delhi High Court health center.

3. Request that the Court direct an investigation and registration of an FIR into my complaints that I was poisoned/ drugged on the premises of the Delhi High Court.

I met Mr. Suri, your personal secretary (designated as Registrar in the Chief Justice's Secretariat) on two separate occasions in March 2012 to inquire as to what action was being taken on my letters.

On the first occasion, Mr. Suri inappropriately attempted to pump me for information as to what my complaints against General Electric Co. were and what I wanted. He did this by first dishonestly presenting himself as a well-wisher. For example he said the High Court needed honest people like me and that he personally and the Delhi High Court would do everything possible to protect me.

On the next occasion, I met Mr. Suri after providing the affidavits filed in CWP 1280 of 2012. On this occasion Mr. Suri made several astonishing statements. Mr. Suri declared that my complaints were baseless. He said he did not consider my complaint about Dr. Bansal urgent. He stated that he had not brought my letters about Dr. Bansal to your attention. He said that he himself would consider if action was needed on my complaints about Dr. Bansal. I told Mr. Suri that my letters were addressed to the Acting Chief Justice and not to Mr. Suri and that he should simply forward my letters to you.

On the request to transfer CWP 1280 of 2012 to another Bench, Mr. Suri stated that the matter had been closed. He said that I would not receive any communication. I asked if there was any written record that the Acting Chief Justice had seen my request. Mr. Suri stated there was no such record. I point out that the file containing action taken on letters (that I was shown the same day) did not record that the matter had been closed.

At one point during the second meeting, Mr. Suri pressed some buttons on his mobile. I believe he recorded part of the conversation. However, when I confronted him with this, Mr. Suri denied it.

Mr. Suri has not brought my letters (and other supporting documents submitted) to your notice and has suppressed these letters addressed to you. I further apprehend that Mr. Suri might have misled you about what information/ documents were provided in/ with these letters.

I request that you personally look into my requests to you and read/ go through the letters and supporting documents enclosed.

Yours faithfully,

Seema Sapra

G 4 first floor

Jangpura Extension

New Delhi 110014

CC:

Registrar General

Delhi High Court

Registrar Vigilance

Delhi High Court"

8. The petitioner handed over one letter to the office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court on April 30, 2012. A copy of this letter dated April 30, 2012 is already on record in this matter. A typed copy of this letter is also reproduced below.

"April 30, 2012

Justice Mr. A K Sikri

Acting Chief Justice

Delhi High Court

New Delhi

Dear Justice A. K. Sikri,

I am writing to follow up on letters to you dated February 17, 2012 (three letters); March 14, 2012 (two letters); March 20, 2012 (two letters); and March 22, 2012 (one letter) and letter dated April 16, 2012.

In these letters, I brought to your attention and requested action from the Court on the following three issues:

4. Prayer to transfer Civil Writ Petition 1280 of 2012 from J. Hima Kohli to another Bench.

5. Request that the Court direct an investigation and registration of an FIR into my complaint against Dr. K.G.S. Bansal, Chief Medical Officer of the Delhi High Court dispensary.

6. Request that the Court direct an investigation and registration of an FIR into my complaints that I was poisoned/ drugged on the premises of the Delhi High Court.

My letters and the complaints made against Dr. K G S Bansal of the Delhi High Court dispensary show that on February 17, 2012 the office of the Delhi High Court Chief Justice was sought to be used in an attempt to murder me.

The facts are that I am a lawyer and a whistle-blower who has made very grave complaints about corruption in General Electric Co.'s bids for Indian Railways locomotive factory tenders. I have complained that my life is in danger and that I have been drugged, poisoned and exposed to toxic inhalants. On February 17 2012, I told you (in your capacity as Acting Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court) in open court that my life was in danger. I said I was being poisoned and medical treatment was being denied to me. I told you that I was surviving day to day and there would be a dead body if the court did not help me. You asked me to return after lunch.

Ignoring the gravity of what I stated in Court, you asked me to file a petition and you and Mr. A. S. Chandhiok (who was present in Court after lunch) asked me to go to the Delhi High Court dispensary for what you called "immediate medical attention". Mr. Chandhiok urged me to go immediately. He also told me all necessary tests could be done there. The Chief Medical Officer in the Delhi High Court dispensary, Dr K G S Bansal prescribed medication that would have caused my death if I had taken it. This is an indisputable fact.

My letters addressed to you have gone unanswered. What exactly was Mr. A. S. Chandhiok trying to do on February 17, 2012? Have me murdered before my petition could be filed? Mr. A. S. Chandhiok needs to explain himself. I also deserve and want a written reply and explanation from you to my letters mentioned above. When I had complained of poisoning, why did you so casually and without a written order (that ought to have noted that I had complained of drugging and poisoning) send me to the Delhi High Court dispensary? Is this how the Court and Authorities are required under law to deal with complaints and cases of poisoning? Why did you refuse to accept my hand-written letter that I attempted to hand over in Court after lunch on February 17, 2012? You insisted that I give that letter to the counsel for the Delhi Police whom you had summoned. I handed over a copy to the Counsel for the Police but also submitted the original to the Chief Justice's secretariat the same day.

I came back to your Court 3-4 times on February 17, 2012 after returning from the Delhi High Court dispensary. I first came back and complained to you in open Court about Dr. K G S Bansal. At that time, I complained about Dr. Bansal's attempt to drug me with Alprax. I did not mention the dangerous blood pressure medication prescription. You simply brushed off my complaint as if it was of no consequence and stated that you were not a doctor. This was also when I asked in open Court if Mr. Chandhiok himself would use the low standard of medical treatment that he had urged me to use. I stated that I wanted full toxicology tests. You ignored me and proceeded to hear your listed matters. After that you changed benches. I clearly noticed you and Mr. Chandhiok smile at each other when you walked in for one of the bench changes. I was sitting in front of Mr. Chandhiok.

I also point out that when my first petition (that was unlawfully converted and renumbered as Criminal Writ Petition 294 of 2012) came up before J. Hima Kohli on February 23, 2012, she refused to hear my petition and pretending to be concerned about medical treatment for a lawyer she suggested that she could direct a panel of doctors at AIIMS (a government hospital) to examine me. I asked her to give this direction in a judicial order passed on my petition and she refused stating "not on that condition" I then tried to tell her that doctors had been used to harm me in the past. I tried to tell her about my experience at Max and Apollo hospitals. She did not let me speak. I tried to tell her about the incident with Dr. K G S Bansal on February 17, 2012 and she again did not let me speak about that. Why?

I have also pointed out in my affidavit filed in Civil Writ Petition 1280 of 2012 that on March 2, 2012 J. Hima Kohli again refused to hear my petition stating it was not maintainable as a civil writ petition and asked me if I wanted to get "admitted" into a government hospital. I countered that with "why should I get admitted?" She then tried to cover up stating that she had meant "treated". I state that J. Hima Kohli wanted to get me "admitted" into a government hospital to remove me from court so that I would not be able to pursue CWP 1280 of 2012. I could then be conveniently drugged, poisoned and eventually eliminated in a government hospital. My complaints against doctors at Max and Apollo hospitals and against Dr. K G S Bansal describe past attempts to get doctors to eliminate me. My family has already been recruited to be used against me. So they would have acquiesced in my elimination in a government hospital. I would have been helpless and under the full control of government doctors with no protection if J. Hima Kohli had succeeded in her attempt to get me "admitted" into a government hospital. I further point out that even on March 2, 2012, J. Hima Kohli's declared position was that my petition was not maintainable because I was asking for protection. On what basis then did J. Hima Kohli want to "admit' me into a government hospital? I point out that on March 2, 2012 Mr. Deepak Adlakha from GE was present in Court watching my matter along with Senior Counsel Mr. Rajiv Nayar. Mr. Rajiv Nayar has recently lied to me and denied that he is representing GE in my matter or that he has/ had been retained/ briefed for my matter.

I state that I am in good health but that I am being drugged and gassed. Attempts are being made to chronically poison me and get me to fall ill.

I have complained that some toxic chemical was being introduced into my house in large quantities after January 13, 2012. Towards the end of February 2012 and March 2012, I had also complained that some kind of dust was being added to my car. (As a precaution I now use a respiratory mask in my car). I inhaled some of this dust on the morning of March 2, 2012 when I retrieved some papers from my car in the car park of the Maurya Sheraton hotel. I was coughing in the taxi on the way to Court and then coughing violently on the High Court premises outside the court fees room when I was waiting for the oath commissioner. I had respiratory complaints at that time (I am fine now). I was finding it difficult to climb stairs and even carry the papers for my petition. I told J. Mukta Gupta in court on 27 February 2012 that I was being poisoned and that I was getting breathless climbing the stairs. Her indifferent reply was that there were lifts in the High Court.

Mr. A. S. Chandhiok is Additional Solicitor General (ASG) for the Government of India. He is also President of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. I gave him a full set of documents with my complaints against General Electric Co. and supporting documents in July/ August 2011 along with a written request for his help as my life was in danger. These were delivered in person at the office of the Delhi High Court Bar Association and a receipt was obtained. (Before this I had briefly discussed the issue with Mr. Chandhiok a few days earlier). What did Mr. Chandhiok do with those documents? As ASG and as a prominent member of the legal bar and an officer of the court, he more than anyone else, was obligated to report the commission of any criminal offence including offences being committed against a colleague at the bar (that he was made aware of) to the authorities. He did not do that. He lied in your Court on February 17, 2012 that he had written to the Police Commissioner. Let him produce this letter to prove that he did not lie. I had no substantive communication with Mr. Chandhiok after those documents were delivered until I spoke to him in Court in February 2012 and requested a meeting. (I received a missed phone call from Mr. A.S. Chandhiok's office on my mobile phone in October 2011. I called back to inquire why. I left a message for Mr. Chandhiok to contact me but he did not call back. I called Mr. Chandhiok again in December 2011/ January 2012 and requested a

meeting. He did not give me any specific time but simply told me to come to his chamber. I did not meet him at that time.)

What Mr. Chandhiok stated and did on February 17, 2012 when I mentioned before you that my life was in danger I have already described in my previous letters to you.

Mr. Chandhiok has marked my right to life and whistleblower petition to himself as senior counsel for the Union of India but did not appear in the matter on five separate occasions. I point out that on two occasions (once before CWP 1280 of 2012 was listed and the other time on 2 March 2012 at around 5 pm) I spoke with Mr. Chandhiok (near the certified copy counter and in the parking lot of the Delhi High Court respectively) asking him for his help now that the right to life petition had been filed. On the first occasion, he said "let your matter come up and we will see". On March 2, 2012, I told him I had spent the previous night in a hotel coffee-shop because I was afraid to go home and that I had been followed there as well and an attempt made to drug me. I told him there was CCTV evidence of who had followed me. He told me he would ask the hotel for the CCTV recordings. I also told him that Additional Commissioner of Police, Ajay Chaudhary definitely knew who was behind the attacks on me. Mr. Chandhiok replied that he would "call Ajay" to his office and speak to him. I told Mr. Chandhiok that despite not having slept for more than 36 hours I still did not want to return to my house where I was being harmed. I also told him that because of the threat I was living under, I was living in squalid conditions in my home. I begged him for his help and rhetorically asked him "how can someone live like this?" Mr. A S. Chandhiok's reply was a cold repetition of what I had stated: "yes, how can someone live like this".

As pointed out, Mr. Chandhiok also did not appear in my matter either on 5 or 7 March 2012. My matter has not been marked to a Union of India Standing Counsel. Instead Ms. Sapna Chauhan has appeared for the Union of India. Ms. Sapna Chauhan has been pretending to act friendly with me outside Court even though I have rebuffed these attempts. A few weeks ago, she positioned herself in the High Court canteen and was waving out to me as if I was a friend. I looked away. Her behaviour inside court has been very different. When I appealed to the Court on March 7, 2012 that the Union of India be directed to protect me and to provide me with a safe house, Ms. Sapna Chauhan told the Court that the Union of India did not have any protection force and did not have any facility like a safe house. (Both these statements are false). I would imagine Ms. Sapna Chauhan stated this on instructions and after discussion with Mr. A.S. Chandhiok. So the Union of India has stated in court on March 7, 2012 that it cannot protect me. I point out that if there is a right to life, there has to be a legal remedy. J. Hima Kohli asked me if I wanted any directions to the police. I replied that the police was involved in the attempts on my life. I asked the Court to direct the Union of India (the Prime Minister's Office and the Home Secretary) to ensure that police and intelligence agencies were not misused to harm me. J. Hima Kohli ignored this submission on March 7, 2012.

To shed further light on Mr. A.S. Chandhiok's duplicity, he came across me in April 2012 near the High Court lobby lift. At that time he asked me how I was. I replied "don't you know"? (Copies of the petition and all other documents filed by me in CWP 1280 of 2012 have been sent to him by the Union of India litigation department). He then stated that despite whatever I might say, I was like "his child" and that he would do everything possible to help me. He said he was ready to go meet the Police Commissioner, Mr. B K Gupta with me. I have not heard from Mr. Chandhiok since then.

I also point out that I attempted to tell lawyers about what was happening in my matter and on 4-5 occasions, I addressed the ladies present in the ladies bar room. Some women lawyers had already been recruited to campaign against me. They protested my describing the conduct of J. Hima Kohli in the bar room. In an attempt to "buy" the favour of the ladies bar room, Mr. Chandhiok, Mr, J P Singh, and Ms. Laxmi Chauhan are at present spending a lot of money re-modelling the bar room. Mr. Chandhiok found the time to visit the ladies bar room on several occasions including on a Saturday to discuss the remodelling, but has not spared even five minutes to sit with me on my complaint of threat to life.

I also point out that before February 17, 2012, I asked Mr. Chandhiok for an appointment to discuss the matter of the threat to my life with him. He was rude and told me to talk to him at 4 pm once Court was over. The intent was clearly to rebuff me. This is also what Mr. J P Singh did when I asked him for a meeting. He said he was busy.

You will recall that around February 16, 2012 a lawyer was brought to your Court on a stretcher because he had been beaten up on account of a matter he had filed in Court. That evening lawyers from the lower courts collected in the High Court to protest. I was also present there. I went up to J P Singh and again asked for a meeting. He became worried that I would raise my situation with the agitating lawyers. He told me then that that was not the "right time" and that he and Mr. Chandhiok would sit with me later. That never happened. My subsequent requests to Mr. J P Singh for this meeting were met with aggressive refusals and excuses of being busy.

Can Mr. A. S. Chandhiok disclose the nature of his relationship/ friendship with Montek Singh Ahluwalia who is implicated in my corruption complaints against General Electric Co.?

I also take this opportunity to describe the conduct of Mr. Najmi Waziri in my matter. I served an advance copy of both my petitions (including CWP 1280 of 2012) on his office. I subsequently served several other documents in CWP 1280 of 2012 on Mr. Najmi Waziri. Yet no one appeared on behalf of Respondent 3 (the Delhi Police) in CWP 1280 of 2012 on the three dates it was listed, i.e., on 2, 5 and 7 March 2012. A few days later I asked Mr. Najmi Waziri in Court why no one had appeared for the Delhi Police. Mr. Waziri feigned ignorance about my matter. After I enlightened him, Mr Waziri asked Mr. Shoaib Haider to check why no one had appeared. Mr. Waziri on this occasion expressly denied that he was handling my matter. He said it must be marked to someone else.

I subsequently asked Mr. Shoaib Haider to give me a written confirmation that the Delhi Police had been served with a copy of the petition. Mr. Haider suggested that as proof of service I request a copy of the service register maintained at Mr. Waziri's office. On 23 April 2012, I went to Mr. Najmi Waziri's High Court chamber and requested the clerk to show me the service register with the entry for my petition,. He showed me the page in the register that recorded that a copy of my petition in CWP 1280 of 2012 was received by Mr. Waziri on February 29, 2012 (item 734 in the register) and that the matter was marked to Mr. Najmi Waziri himself. I asked the clerk if I could get a copy of this page. He went to ask Mr. Waziri for permission. At this time, Mr. Waziri insisted that he had appeared in my matter on every occasion and that he had read every page of my petition. He queried whether I wanted to complain against him or if I wanted to take my matter forward. I point out that the day I mentioned the threat to life before you on February 17, 2012, Mr. Vibhu Bakhru and Mr. Najmi Waziri were standing at the back of Court No. 1. They saw me sitting in Court near the front. I heard Mr. Vibhu Bakhru tell Mr. Najmi Waziri "she is going to mention". I have described the conduct of the Standing Counsel for the Government of Delhi/ Delhi Police in a matter involving a serious threat to the life of a practicing woman lawyer who has complained of police complicity and cover-up in the threat to her.

I point out that CWP 1280 of 2012 was listed before the Registrar on 25 April 2012 and yet again no one appeared on behalf of Delhi Police. The Registrar (Mr. D S Bhandari) would not let me speak about how service had already been completed on Mr. Najmi Waziri. Mr. Bhandari also would not let me speak on how service was already effected on the Central Vigilance Commission and about my ongoing attempts to serve General Electric Co. in the United States. Mr. Bhandari made several attempts to dictate an order that misrepresented what I had stated before him. I had to insist that he allow me to speak and that he record what I was stating accurately. He finally agreed that I would file an affidavit on the issue of service to General Electric Co. What is wrong with the Delhi High Court that at every step of this whistle-blower writ petition against General Electric Co., I am being confronted with corrupted judges and officials including a corrupted Registrar (Mr. D. S. Bhandari) on April 25, 2012?

I point out that the Union of India, the Delhi Police and other respondents have not filed any replies to the petition or the interim application in CWP 1280 of 2012 even after more than seven weeks since the order directing them to do this. This is the conduct of Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Ms. Sapna Chauhan and Mr. Najmi Waziri in a matter where a lawyers life hangs in the balance and where their actions can influence the outcome.

In my letter dated April 16, 2012, I also complained about my interaction with Mr. Suri, your personal secretary (designated as Registrar in the Chief Justice's Secretariat). In addition to what I have already stated about my meetings with Mr. Suri I add that among other objectionable things that he said to me, Mr. Suri also strongly recommended that I approach GE's competitors for work assignments since they benefited from my complaints and writ petition. He also badgered me with unwelcome questions about why I was not married. He recommended that I stay away from doctors. He also said that Dr. K G S Bansal ought not to have attempted to prescribe Alprax.

I have complained that J. Hima Kohli and J. Mukta Gupta acting in conspiracy on someone's instructions attempted to prevent my right to life petition and prayer from being heard. Let me elaborate on this. On February 17, 2012 I told you in open court that my life was in danger because of my whistle-blower complaints against General Electric and Montek Singh Ahluwalia. Apart from sending me to the Delhi High Court dispensary, you told me to file a petition. I told you that I was afraid of being eliminated before I could file my petition and asked that I be protected by a court order until I could file a petition. You replied stating that I should file a "two-page" petition seeking police investigation and that the matter would be listed before Court the next day.

I have already described above and in my previous letters the attempt and conspiracy to murder me before this petition could be filed.

However, I survived this attempt to murder me and filed a whistle-blower and right to life petition on February 22, 2012 which was listed before J. Hima Kohli on 23 February 2012 as Civil Writ Petition 1090 of 2012. On 23 February 2012, J. Hima Kohli without my consent and despite my objections transferred my matter to the criminal side of the Delhi High Court and directed that my petition be renumbered and listed as a criminal writ petition. Her only reason was that I had asked for police and CBI investigations in one of the prayers. In passing this order, J. Hima Kohli effectively changed the nature of my petition so that my whistle-blower complaints and prayers against General Electric Co. and its subsidiaries would not be heard. A criminal court hearing the renumbered petition (Crl WP 294 of 2012) would not have had the jurisdiction to entertain the prayers made against General Electric and a criminal court would not have issued notice to General Electric or examined the records itself. Instead the police/ CBI could have been used to cover up all my complaints. A criminal court would also not have had the jurisdiction to pass an order of protection for the whistle-blower if these whistle-blower complaints were not before it.

I withdrew Crl WP No. 294 of 2012 (originally filed as CWP 1090 of 2012) and filed a fresh petition, Civil Writ Petition No. 1280 of 2012. This fresh petition was also listed before J. Hima Kohli on March 2, 2012. I have filed three affidavits in CWP 1280 of 2012 describing how J. Mukta Gupta and J. Hima Kohli conspired in an attempt to prevent this fresh petition from being heard. On March 2, 2012 J. Hima Kohli asked me to withdraw Crl. WP 294 of 2012 (which was also listed the same day before J. Mukta Gupta along with an application to withdraw) and then return to J. Hima Kohli's court so that she could take up my fresh petition CWP 1280 of 2012. I immediately left the court to do this. There was an incident that I have not described earlier which in light of the conspiracy I have described appears relevant. I was in the lift going down to the first floor in order to rush to J. Mukta Gupta's court as my matter in her court was about to reach. Just as the lift doors were about to shut the restorer and court assistant from J. Hima Kohli's court came up to the lift and insisted that I return to Court No. 10 and pick up my bags. They were very insistent but I told them my matter was about to reach and that I would be back within 15 minutes. It appears that the attempt was to delay me so that I would not reach in time for my matter in J. Mukta Gupta's court who could then pass an order that would prejudice my fresh writ petition. Fortunately however I reached J. Mukta Gupta's court in time. I have earlier described how she intentionally mis-recorded my prayer in the order she passed on March 2, 2012. Her written order (which I inspected on March 3, 2012) was different from the order she dictated in court on March 2, 2012 and which I reconfirmed in court on March 2, 2012.

I went back to J. Hima Kohli's court on March 2, 2012 and stated that I had withdrawn Crl WP 294 of 2012. J. Hima Kohli wanted to know what order had been passed by J. Mukta Gupta. I stated that J. Mukta Gupta had allowed me to withdraw Crl WP 294 of 2012 with liberty to file a fresh criminal writ petition seeking appropriate criminal remedies in addition to the fresh petition already filed (CWP 1280 of 2012) invoking civil rights and seeking civil remedies. J. Hima Kohli insisted that she needed to see the order passed by J. Mukta Gupta herself and adjourned my matter to March 5, 2012 which was the following Monday. I filed applications to inspect the orders passed in both Crl WP 294 of 2012 and in CWP 1280 of 2012.

The next day, ie., on Saturday 3 March 2012 I inspected the file in Crl WP 294 of 2012 after it was initially not made available to me under a false pretext. I noticed that J. Mukta Gupta had mis-recorded my prayer in her order and I understood that this could be used by J. Hima Kohli as an excuse to refuse to hear my CWP 1280 of 2012 on March 5, 2012. I drafted and filed an affidavit in CWP 1280 of 2012 clarifying the facts on March 3, 2012 itself. I also wanted to inspect the court file in CWP 1280 of 2012 and read the order passed by J. Hima Kohli on March 2, 2012. Despite my application for inspection and despite my waiting in Court till 5 pm and despite my requests to the court staff, I was not allowed to inspect the court file in CWP 1280 of 2012 on March 3, 2012. I was told that the order had not been signed by the Judge.

On the morning of March 5, 2012 I again requested the court staff in Court No. 10 to show me the last order passed in CWP 1280 of 2012. I have described in my affidavits how the court staff again refused to show me the order and inserted it into the court file at 10.25 am. They then showed me the order at 10.25 am because I made certain statements in open court to the other lawyers present there.

I found the following paragraph in the order passed by J. Hima Kohli on March 2, 2012:

"This court recalls that the relief sought by the petitioner at prayer (4) in the present petition was also sought by her in the earlier writ petition, and the Court was not inclined to entertain the said petition on the civil side having regard to the nature of relief sought by her. However, as the file of the aforesaid writ petition has been summoned, this aspect shall be examined on the next date"

The petitioner states that the above paragraph in J. Hima Kohli's order dated March 2, 2012 and the misrepresentation of the petitioner's prayer in J. Mukta Gupta's order were intended to be cummulatively used by J. Hima Kohli to refuse to hear CWP 1280 of 2012 on March 5, 2012.

Prayer no. 4 in CWP 1280 of 2012 is that the Court "Enforce and protect the right to life of the Petitioner and direct that the Petitioner be provided full protection and safety and be immediately relocated to a safe house." This prayer invokes a civil right and seeks a civil remedy. This relief claimed in this right can only be granted in a civil writ petition under Article 226 and not in a criminal writ petition. The petitioner also has the fundamental right to approach the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution of India in civil proceedings to enforce her right to life under Article 21. The petitioner handed over citations to three decisions to the court master in J. Hima Kohli's court on March 7, 2012 before the matter was heard. These are the Supreme Court of India in S.A.L. Narayan Row versus Ishwarlal Bhagwandas (AIR 1965 SC 1818); the Bombay High Court in Nagpur Cable Operators versus Commissioner of Police (AIR 1996 Bom 180); and the Patna High Court in Ram Kishun Upadhyaya versus State of Bihar (AIR 1995 Patna 140). These three decisions show how untenable J. Hima Kohli's statement recorded in her order dated March 2, 2012 was.

Further, J. Hima Kohli's statement in her order dated March 2, 2012 that "This court recalls that the relief sought by the petitioner at prayer (4) in the present petition was also sought by her in the earlier writ petition, and the Court was not inclined to entertain the said petition on the civil side having regard to the nature of relief sought by her" was patently false and incorrect. The reason indicated by J. Hima Kohli in court on February 23, 2012 for converting the earlier writ into a criminal writ petition was that the prayers included a prayer for investigation by the Police and the CBI. The petitioner did not include those prayers in the fresh petition (CWP 1280 of 2012).

It is clear that the intent behind not allowing the petitioner the opportunity to read J. Hima Kohli's order in advance before the hearing on March 5, 2012, was to take the petitioner by surprise in court so that she would not be able to react. However, the petitioner's experience with J. Hima Kohli and J. Mukta Gupta on previous hearings made it clear to the petitioner on March 3, 2012 that J. Hima Kohli and J,. Mukta Gupta were collusively laying the ground to refuse to hear the petition once again without passing an order on maintainability that could be appealed. The petitioner therefore drafted and affirmed an affidavit asking J. Hima Kohli to recuse herself from CWP 1280 of 2012 and served a copy on the Union of India before 10.30 am on March 5, 2012.

On March 5, 2012, the Petitioner asked J. Hima Kohli to recuse herself. She wanted to know on what grounds. The petitioner told her the grounds were described in the affidavit and this had been served on the Union of India but could not be filed in court as the matter was listed that day. The petitioner requested J. Hima Kohli to adjourn the matter till after lunch and in the meantime direct that the registry accept the affidavit and place it on the court file. J. Hima Kohli told the petitioner she was simply adjourning the matter as prayed so that the affidavit could be filed. The petitioner was also told by J. Hima Kohli that the affidavit filed on March 3, 2012 setting the record straight on J. Mukta Gupta's order dated March 2, 2012 was not in the court file. This was despite the petitioner having been told by the staff in Court No. 10 on March 3, 2012 that they would ensure that the affidavit is placed in the court file. In a further attempt to delay hearing of the petitioner's right to life petition, J. Hima Kohli suggested on March 5, 2012 that the petitioner should move an application seeking correction of J. Mukta Gupta's order. Such an application was on the facts present before J. Hima Kohli completely unnecessary. The petitioner stated that such an application was unnecessary on March 5, 2012 but this submission is not recorded in the order passed. J. Hima Kohli's written order passed on March 5, 2012 again did not accurately reflect what transpired in Court.

J. Hima Kohli adjourned CWP 1280 of 2012 to March 7, 2012. On that date she asked me to argue. I replied that I wanted J. Hima Kohli to recuse herself for the reasons set out in the affidavit dated March 5, 2012. J. Hima Kohli asked me to present oral arguments on my prayer for recusal. I therefore repeated some parts of my affidavit in court. J. Hima Kohli refused to recuse herself. I asked J. Hima Kohli to adjourn the matter so that I could file an appeal. J. Hima Kohli refused to do that also. She then asked me to argue my interim application. I stated that the Union of India should be directed to protect me. I have described above what transpired in Court on March 7, 2012 on this application. J. Hima Kohli also asked me if I wanted help from an NGO. I replied that I did not think I could trust an NGO in this matter when I could not trust my family, doctors or the police and that the Union of India should protect me. J. Hima Kohli refused to pass an order of protection on March 7, 2012 and in a clearly motivated direction asked the court master to give a date in May. i,e., a date more than two months later to hear and pass orders on the prayer for protection made by a woman lawyer living alone who has filed a threat to life and whistle-blower petition exposing very serious high level corruption and who has been harmed, drugged, poisoned and gassed in the past.

I would also like to describe my experience when I mentioned the threat to my life before the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, J. Kapadia in July 2011. Someone present in Court that day warned GE that I was going to mention something. Mr. Harish Salve along with Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Ms. Vijaylakshmi Menon and another lady lawyer from Mumbai who I believe was from AZB came to the Court under the false pretext of another mentioning.

J. Kapadia initially refused to entertain my letter as a petition and told me to go to the Police. (Earlier, Mr. Ramesh Singh, a lawyer had told me that Mr. Soli Sorabjee would call J. Kapadia if I approached the Supreme Court). However I mentioned the matter again before lunch. J. Kapadia then sent his court master to ask me for the papers.

I mentioned this fact (that J. Kapadia had asked for the papers) to another lawyer Mr. Arunabh Chaudhary during the lunch hour. Mr. Harish Salve and Mr. Bhargava Desai then returned to the Supreme Court during lunch and went to meet J. Swatantra Kumar who was on the bench with J. Kapadia.

As a result, after lunch the court master told me to mention my matter before J. Aftab Alam whose daughter worked/ still works for the Planning Commission as a consultant and who I believe knew about my complaints against General Electric. I told the Court master that it would not be appropriate to mention the matter before J. Alam for this reason.

I mentioned again before J. Kapadia the next day. He stated in open Court that he had taken cognizance of my letter and had directed the registry to number and list it as a right to life petition. J. Kapadia stated in open court that the matter was listed as item no. 1 in J. Aftab Alam's court. The matter was not listed in any court that day.

I was sought out and told by the court No. 1 court-master the next day that the Chief Justice of India wanted to help me but he was bound by procedure and that if I mentioned the matter before J. Aftab Alam, the latter would recuse himself. This was on Thursday. That weekend and the following Monday and Tuesday I smelt chemicals and nitrous oxide in my home. I developed severe nausea and a lump in my throat in addition to other symptoms. My home was broken into during the weekend.

I requested J. Aftab Alam to recuse himself on the following Monday or Tuesday. The matter was not listed before him. He used this as an opportunity to intimidate me. He claimed to be aware of my letter but said my matter was not listed before him. He said that he would not hear me when I mentioned his daughter's connection and how that would disqualify him. I agreed with him that he should not hear my petition.

The matter was never listed. The matter was not listed even after I made inquiries from the Registrar and the court No. 1 court-master.

The law-firm AZB and Ms. Zia Mody are GE's lawyers for my complaints. Earlier in February 2011, Mr. Soli Sorabjee tried to "persuade" me not to pursue my complaint of forgery. Among other things, he said I had no support. He said GE would change the incriminating document lying with the government. He was telling me that GE would destroy the evidence. I replied that I did not think GE's US lawyers would commit perjury on oath.

I also point out that some lawyers have been used or have participated in the intimidation, harassment, threats and harm directed at me. Lawyers have also been used as enablers by spreading false rumours about me to discredit me. There is a full-fledged campaign going on in the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court of India against me. My family could not have been blackmailed with a domestic violence complaint without the participation of lawyers.

I am sorry to see that the standards of integrity and honesty in the legal bar have fallen so low. This shows how deep the roots of corruption go in our country. The bar association in particular seems to no longer stand for the rule of law.

Some lawyers who have participated in the conspiracy to eliminate me include:

Soli J Sorabjee, Raian Karanjawala, Anupam Sanghi, Amit Sharma, Pratibha and Maninder Singh, Neeraj Chaudhary (standing counsel UOI), S S Chadha,

Diya Kapur, Ronnie Bannerjee, Rajiv Shukla, Prashanto Sen (and his doctor wife), Darpan Wadhwa, Ayushman Pandey, Manish Lamba, Arvind Nigam, Arunabh Chaudhary, Trideep Pais, Sandeep Sethi, Madhavi and Shyam Diwan, Tara Ganju and there are more. I can describe in detail what roles these lawyers have played.

How are these lawyers different from those who bribe witnesses? Intimidating, harassing, targeting and participating in harming a whistle-blower and a witness to corruption and covering up corruption and other criminal offences is an even more serious criminal offence.

I point out that in July/ August 2011 besides the Chief Justice of India and Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, I gave a full set of my complaints against General Electric to Mr. Ghoolam Vahanvati (the Attorney General of India), Ms. Indira Jaisingh, Mr. Gaurab Bannerjee, Mr. Parag Tripathi, and Mr. Pravin Parekh. Mr. Ghoolam Vahanvati forwarded the papers to the Home Secretary. What did the other government law officers and the President of the Supreme Court Bar Association do with the documents I provided them and on my request for their help? To my knowledge they did nothing.

The facts described above speak volumes for the rotten state the country is in because of the pervasive corruption. The standards of integrity and honesty even among the legal bar and within the judicial institutions have fallen to the lowest possible levels. Lawyers have shown themselves willing to silently stand by and watch while a colleague (a whistle-blower) is being openly harmed. Even worse some lawyers and judges have been willing to participate in and/ or enable such harm.

In this situation and with the facts set out above, how can I have any confidence in obtaining just relief from the Delhi High Court or even the Supreme Court of India?

I again make a strong request that you give me a written response to my letters. I also request a personal meeting with you to discuss the complaints made in my letters. Is the Delhi High Court first waiting for me to be murdered? I am being gassed in my home as I write this.

Yours faithfully,

Seema Sapra

G 4 first floor

Jangpura Extension

New Delhi 110014

Copies to -

1 Registrar General, Delhi High Court

2 Registrar Vigilance, Delhi High Court

3 Chairman and Council Members, Bar Council of Delhi

4 Chairman and Council Members, Bar Council of India

5 Full Executive Committee, Delhi High Court Bar Association

6 Mr. A. S. Chandhiok, Additional Solicitor General, Delhi High Court

7 Mr. Najmi Waziri, Standing Counsel, Govt. of Delhi, Delhi High Court"

9. The petitioner handed over one letter to the office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court on May 17, 2012. A copy of this letter dated May 17, 2012 is already on record in this matter. A typed copy of this letter is also reproduced below.

"May 17, 2012

Justice Mr. A K Sikri

Acting Chief Justice

Delhi High Court

New Delhi

Dear Mr. A. K. Sikri,

I am writing in connection with my letters to you dated February 17, 2012 (three letters); March 14, 2012 (two letters); March 20, 2012 (two letters); and March 22, 2012 (one letter); letter dated April 16, 2012; and letter dated April 30, 2012.

I am a practicing lawyer and petitioner in person in Civil Writ Petition No. 1280 of 2012 (CWP 1280 of 2012) pending in the Delhi High Court. I have complained of a threat to my life on account of the corruption complaints I have made in CWP 1280 of 2012.

I have described in detail and provided detailed evidence regarding the threat to my life; including past instances of me having been poisoned and drugged; of past and ongoing attempts to poison and drug me; of other attempts to murder me; and of other violence and threat of violence directed towards me. I have also complained of and produced evidence of threats communicated to me, of intimidation, and of harassment.

I have not received even a preliminary hearing in CWP 1280 of 2012 including on my application for protection since CWP 1280 of 2012 was filed on February 29, 2012.

Meanwhile I have been drugged and poisoned even after the petition was filed.

I have described in great detail and provided substantial evidence of an attempt to murder me on February 17, 2012. The office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court and the office of the Additional Solicitor General (Delhi High Court) was sought to be used in this attempt to murder me.

Since February 17, 2012 and more particularly since March 14, 2012, you have been trying to cover up the attempt to murder me on February 17, 2012. You have done this by refusing to acknowledge and answer my request for an investigation which is called for on the basis of the facts and evidence I have provided.

There are two possibilities. Either you were personally involved in the attempt to murder me on February 17, 2012 along with Mr. A. S. Chandhiok. Or you were unknowingly used as part of this attempt to murder me. And you are now covering up my complaint. In either case, your actions constitute contempt of your own court. You have lowered the dignity of the high office you hold. This must be one of the very rare instances (if not the first instance) where a high judicial office was used in an attempt to murder a whistle-blower who has exposed very serious corruption. The very forum that I approached for protection was sought to be used to eliminate me before my petition was filed.

The brazenness of the February 17, 2012 attempt to murder me and the subsequent attempted cover-up illuminates how gross the problem of high-level corruption in India is.

I have narrated the corrupt conduct of the Chief Justice of India, J. Kapadia and Supreme Court Justices J. Aftab Alam and J. Swatantra Kumar in my matter in July 2011. I have described the corrupt conduct of J. Hima Kohli and J. Mukta Gupta of the Delhi High Court in my matter in February and March 2012.

J. Hima Kohli finally recused herself from my matter on May 9, 2012 after presumably you recommended to her that she do so.

CWP 1280 of 2012 was listed before J. Sunil Gaur of the Delhi High Court on May 14, 2012 who recused himself on the ground that I dared to make one single polite request that he allow me to speak when he was intent on misunderstanding crucial facts. I point out that J. Sunil Gaur had clearly not even read the petition and annexures before the court hearing.

CWP 1280 of 2012 was then listed before J. Indermeet Kaur of the Delhi High Court on May 16, 2012. I requested her to recuse herself because my complaints involve several influential sikh persons. She was already disinclined to hear my matter perhaps because she knew that I mentioned this apprehension before you earlier in the morning.. I requested for a short date because the matter involves ongoing poisoning and attempts to drug me. She gave a date in July. Upon my protest she then fixed the matter for May 25, 2012. I requested for an even shorter date. She refused. I was not allowed to argue why a shorter date was called for. A police constable present in court asked me to leave court when I wanted to address the court on why a shorter date was called for. The evidence (including medical records like chest xrays) establishing that I was and am being poisoned and drugged is available on the court file. Despite this and without even having heard the matter or having considered the facts, documents and evidence, J. Indermeet Kaur conveyed her opinion that my complaints of being poisoned or drugged "might be a figment of my imagination". On what basis did J. Indermeet Kaur form this "might be" opinion before even giving me a hearing? This statement by J. Indermeet Kaur shows that I was justified in asking her to recuse herself. How can a Judge hear a matter when even before the first hearing she has a closed and already made-up mind? On what basis did she make up her mind on this crucial issue without hearing me first? J. Indermeet Kaur's uncalled for opinion expressed (before hearing me and before considering the evidence) when she was recusing herself as well as the nature of her remark show that it was not based upon the pleadings and the documents. Her remark was based upon extraneous factors that she should explain. How can and why would a Judge's first reaction to a complaint of poisoning by a whistleblower be that it 'might be a figment of the complainant's imagination'?

On the morning of May 16, 2012, I attempted to describe in your court the attempt to murder me on February 17, 2012. I asked you if you had read my earlier letters as I have received no response from you. You would not let me speak on this issue. The reason you would not let me speak is because you must have heard from J. Sunil Gaur that I had described the attempt to murder me on February 17, 2012 in detail in his court on May 14, 2012 when CWP 1280 of 2012 was being heard and had stated then that if you were involved personally then you had committed contempt of your own court.

You did not allow me to speak in your Court on May 16, 2012. Instead you stated that on February 17, 2012, I had complained I was unwell. You also stated that because Dr. K.G. S. Bansal did not know me from before there could have been no attempt to murder me. Let me point out the crucial facts again.

I stated in your court on February 17, 2012 that I had made corruption complaints against General Electric and Montek Singh Ahluwalia and was being poisoned and also being denied medical treatment. I stated that doctors were being spoken to. I stated that if the Court did not help me there would soon be a dead body. I stated that my lungs were being poisoned. I stated that I was getting breathless upon exertion and was waking up at night breathless.

You made me give a written complaint to the counsel for Delhi Police and you asked him to look into the matter. Mr. A.S. Chandhiok told you he had already written to the police commissioner. He told you he would look into my complaints.

You suggested that I file a petition and seek urgent medical attention in the Delhi High Court dispensary. Mr. Chandhiok fervently recommended and urged that I go to the Delhi High court dispensary immediately where he said I could get all tests done.

I asked you to protect me until I could file a petition and you refused.

I went to the Delhi High Court dispensary and was given a prescription that would have caused my death if I had taken the medicines prescribed. In my letter to you dated March 20, 2012 I stated inter-alia as under:

"Dr. Baldev Singh then falsified my blood pressure reading as 180/ 100 and prescribed Eslo AT (s-amlodipine) which is a calcium channel blocker and alprax which he told me to take at night.

Since I am not hypertensive, Dr. Baldev Singh's prescription was dangerous and could have proven fatal if I had followed it. Instead I got my blood pressure checked subsequently and it was normal.

Dr. Baldev Singh intentionally falsified my blood pressure reading and then prescribed a medicine which he knew could be fatal.

I am certain my BP was normal on February 17, 2012 even when I met Dr. Baldev Singh. I was in court and was feeling well except for respiratory symptoms on exertion.

And given that my blood pressure was normal, taking ESLO AT for five days could have caused dangerous hypotension or heart failure."

I have provided to you both Dr. K.G.S. Bansal's prescription and my subsequent blood pressure readings. The indisputable medical conclusion is that if I had followed Dr. KGS Bansal's prescription I would be most likely dead. I asked the court to help me and stated that without its help there would soon be a dead body. You and Mr. A.S. Chandhiok steered me towards a direction which would have led to a dead body if I had not had the presence of mind to perceive and understand Dr. KGS Bansal's bad intentions and to get my blood pressure checked elsewhere.

You and Mr. A.S. Chandhiok now want to deny any responsibility for what happened on February 17, 2012 and for what could have happened as a result.

You stated that I had said I was unwell. I had also said that I was unwell because I was being poisoned. Was it not improper and inappropriate for you to recommend that I go to the High Court dispensary? Remember I was unwell. I looked to the Court for protection. I wanted toxicology tests. I did not know what to expect at the dispensary. I thought the doctors there would do a preliminary examination and recommend a further course of action to me and to the Court. Would it not have been more appropriate for you to send me to AIIMS with my complaint of poisoning? Why did you ignore me after I came back from the dispensary and told you that Dr. KGS Bansal had prescribed alprax in order to drug me? At this time I again stated that I needed toxicology tests. I also stated that I wanted a judicial order for these tests. You ignored me then and simply told me to file a petition.

You also stated that Dr. KGS Bansal did not know me from before. This you suggested showed that he could have had no intention of harming me. This naïve statement coming from the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court is surprising to say the least. This statement and your defence of Dr. KGS Bansal without an investigation of any sort suggest your attempt to cover-up.

There was enough time for someone to contact Dr. KGS Bansal either on the phone or in person from the time you suggested that I go to the dispensary (and I indicated that I would) and to the time that I met Dr. KGS Bansal.

In fact, someone was present in Dr. KGS Bansal's room when I reached there and he asked me to wait. I now recollect that the person with Dr. KGS Bansal was in some kind of uniform, either a court official or a security official.

There was also time for someone (perhaps Mr. A.S. Chandhiok) to contact you during lunch and to suggest that you recommend that I go to the High Court dispensary.

I would even go one step further. I was told by your secretary Mr. Suri that Dr. KGS Bansal had been recently transferred to the Delhi High Court dispensary. I wonder when he was moved to the Delhi High Court? Was this in February 2012 after I started coming to the court regularly? Was he posted there in order to have a compliant Chief Medical Officer (CMO) in case I ever utilised the services at the dispensary? The past attempts to eliminate me exhibited detailed planning. I could have been poisoned at the Delhi High Court necessitating my being taken to the dispensary. Was Dr. KGS Bansal brought to the Delhi High Court as part of the conspiracy to eliminate me?

I have also described three seemingly separate incidents on February 17, 2012 - first, the attempt by a lawyer during the lunch hour to find out what my intentions were; second, the attempt to get me to leave the Delhi High Court during or right after lunch on February 17, 2012 (the pressure to make me leave court came from two quarters – my family and Dr. Sonali Vatsa at Max Hospital – and in both cases was suspicious); and third the attempt to create a false scenario or a story where I met someone for drinks that same evening. All of this along with Dr. KGS Bansal's prescription was a complete recipe for murder. As I stated before in my letter of March 20, 2012:

Let me set out the scenario if I had blindly followed Dr. Baldev Singh's prescription:

If I had followed Dr. Baldev Singh's prescription and taken the calcium channel blocker and alprax, I could have fallen ill or even died because of a complication like hypotension or heart failure.

There would have been no petition in the High Court. I point out that the Delhi High Court was shut for three days after February 17, 2012.

…

To the above I add that this would not have been the first time that someone would be used to tell lies and explain away a murder disguised as a natural death. The recipe for murder on February 17, 2012 would have included the following false ingredients: an allegedly stressed victim in a concocted hypertensive emergency; poison in the guise of a blood pressure medication; alprax; alcohol; and so-called relatives and friends ready to lie about all kinds of circumstances that would have accounted for the death. There would have been no petition against General Electric Co. and my corruption and whistle-blower complaints would never have been described in a court record.

As mentioned earlier you attempted to cover-up the crime committed against me on February 17, 2012, by attempting to twist the narrative on May 16, 2012. You stated I had complained I was unwell. You also stated that because Dr. K.G. S. Bansal did not know me from before there could have been no attempt to murder me. You said I was being paranoid. Mr. A.K. Sikri, the facts and evidence which you did not let me describe in Court on February 16, 2012 speak otherwise.

You are obstructing the course of justice and covering up an attempt to murder. To prevent me from speaking up in Court you had me physically dragged away from your court. I was assaulted and viciously pushed to the ground outside court no. 1 by the police. My body is hurting today. I was harassed by the police later who used force to attempt to make me leave the High Court premises. I was not allowed to appear in my matter listed the same day with peace of mind and equanimity. I was followed and harassed by police constables around the court premises through the day and until the evening.

As I stated in your court yesterday, your conduct in my matter reeks of corruption and of acting under influence and pressure. Further, you have knowingly or unknowingly participated in an attempt to murder me and are now attempting to cover-up that crime against me.

You can use force to prevent me from stating the truth in your court but you cannot silence me. You have committed and continue to commit contempt of your own court. I have no wish to enter your court-room again. Kindly let me know in writing (by email at the email address given below as my postal/ courier mail is not being delivered to me) which alternative bench I should reach out to instead of the court of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court.

Yours faithfully,

Seema Sapra

G 4 first floor

Jangpura Extension

New Delhi 110014

seema.sapra@gmail.com

Copies to –

1 Registrar General, Delhi High Court

2 Registrar Vigilance, Delhi High Court

3 Chairman and Council Members, Bar Council of Delhi

4 Chairman and Council Members, Bar Council of India

5 Full Executive Committee, Delhi High Court Bar Association

6 Mr. A. S. Chandhiok, Additional Solicitor General, Delhi High Court

7 Mr. Najmi Waziri, Standing Counsel, Govt. of Delhi, Delhi High Court

8 Justice Indermeet Kaur, Judge, Delhi High Court

9 Secretary General, Supreme Court of India

10 Mr. Brackett Denniston, General Counsel, General Electric Co.

11 Mr. Ghoolam Vahanvati, Attorney General of India

12 Secretary, Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India'

10. The petitioner handed over one letter to the office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court on May 26, 2012. The petitioner does not have the stamped copy of this letter with the receipt from the office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court as the original was removed from her residence in her absence with all her other belongings during the illegal eviction of the petitioner from her rented residence on May 30, 2012. A typed copy of this letter is also reproduced below.

"May 26, 2012

Justice Mr. A K Sikri

Acting Chief Justice

Delhi High Court

New Delhi

Mr. A K Sikri,

I am writing to you in connection with my letters dated May 16 and May 17, 2012 (attached) and my earlier letters dated February 17, 2012 (three letters); March 14, 2012 (two letters); March 20, 2012 (two letters); and March 22, 2012 (one letter); letter dated April 16, 2012; and letter dated April 30, 2012. .

I point out that I met the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court, Mr. V P Vaish on May 21, 2012. In response to my request that I be given an alternative as I do not wish to appear before your court again, the Registrar General has informed me that I should mention my matters before Division Bench III instead of your court.

Since my complaint in my letter dated May 17 2012 is also a complaint about your conduct and your involvement in the attempt to murder me on February 17, 2012, it will not be appropriate now for you to look into my complaints. Given their gravity, these complaints should be forwarded to the Chief Justice of India and the Law Secretary of the Government of India.

I point out certain other facts in relation to the attempt to murder me on February 17, 2012.

1. Dr.. K G S Bansal is unlikely to have ever prescribed s-amlodipine before.

2. The false blood pressure reading that Dr. Bansal wrote down is the borderline between stage 2 and stage 3 (life threatening) blood pressure.

3. Also, I want to emphasize clearly that on February 17, 2012 both you and Mr. A S Chandhiok told me to go to the Delhi High Court dispensary. After I sat down that day, Mr. Chandhiok leaned over and insisted that I go right away. He called one of his junior lawyers, and asked her to take me to the dispensary.

I would also like to describe in greater detail the conduct of the police on May 16, 2012. I have stated in my hand-written letter dated May 16, 2012 that I was physically dragged out from Court No. 1 by police constables. Members of the DHCBA executive body (Mr. J P Singh and Mr. Shyam Sharma) and Mr. Kirti Uppal had the court emptied to facilitate the use of force against me by the Police. I re-entered court no. 1, simply intending to sit down but I was dragged out again with violent force by police constables. (I still have the bruise on my left arm.) Even once I was outside the court-room, one female police constable continued to push me and viciously threw me to the ground. I asked the police then under what authority of law was I being prevented from entering Court No. 1. There was no reply.

I walked away from Court 1 myself after about 5-10 minutes and was in the area outside Court 8. The police constables followed me. I burst into tears at this time and moved to the side to sit down. At that time, I was encircled by the police and they started to push and pull me and to force me to leave the High Court premises. They also asked other lawyers to move away. I was surrounded by male and female police personnel (a few inches away from me) who kept telling me repeatedly to go with them outside the court premises. I told them very clearly to leave me alone and that I simply wished to sit down. They continued to surround me and kept pulling and shoving me. They attempted to snatch my bag after a male policeman gave directions to the women to snatch my bag. Mr. Kirti Uppal at this stage attempted to trick me into leaving the High Court premises by stating that I should go with the police because they would help me by noting down my complaints. I told him that he should stop trying to trick me. The police constables also lied that there was an order to remove me from the High Court premises. I asked them to show me the order and I was told it was verbal.

I then sat down and closed my eyes so that it would be clear to onlookers that the police was pulling and shoving me. The constables stopped touching me but continued to stand close to me. At this point they wanted to fetch me water. I ignored them. I continued to sit for about 15 minutes. I then got up to look at the board to see if my matter in Court 27 was about to reach. The women constables followed me. I started to walk towards court 27. The police constables continued to follow me. They were running after me even though I was walking.

I reached court 27 and was walking in when my way was blocked by these police constables who told me that I could not enter the court-room and that I should leave the High Court premises. I told them I had a matter listed in that court, but they still refused to let me enter. I was finally allowed to enter court 27 after one of the woman constables was told by someone on the phone to let me enter. I entered court and was followed into court by one woman constable who came up and stood right behind me. I sat down. When my matter reached, the judge recused herself and first gave a date in July 2012. I objected to the long date and the police constable came up to me and asked me to leave the court-room. By what authority did she do this? This would constitute police interference in the administration of justice. (I was being threatened and intimidated inside court by the police that if I opened my mouth again I would again be physically dragged out.) I protested to the Judge about the date and she then indicated May 25, 2012 as the date. I again asked for a shorter date as this was a matter concerning threat to life. This request was not considered by the Judge. I came out of the court-room and was again surrounded by the police constables who asked me to leave the High Court premises,. I went back into court and complained to the Judge. One woman constable was asked to come in and was asked by the Judge what the matter was. She lied and denied that she had spoken to me. I went out of Court 27 and walked towards the lift. I was being followed into the lift by 4 female constables and one male police inspector. I decided to take the stairs. As I was walking towards the stairs the police inspector (Negi) put his arm out to block my way and told me to leave the High Court. He attempted to push me out through the exit door. I ignored him and went back to Court No. 27. I again complained to the Judge that the police was harassing me and attempting to force me to leave the High Court premises. She told me the Police would not harass me and to come back to her if there was a problem. I came out of court 27. The police inspector then went into Court 27. I followed him. He whispered something to the Court-Master which was in turn whispered to the Judge. I was not informed of what the inspector communicated to the Judge. The Judge told Inspector Negi that the police should leave me alone, that I was a lawyer and should be allowed to do my work. The Judge told me that whatever had happened in the morning in Court No. 1 was history and I should forget about it. I walked out of court and the police constables and Inspector Negi again attempted to follow me. I went back to the Judge in Court 27 and again complained. The Judge told me that I should go see the Registrar General as she was busy in Court.

I then went to see the Registrar General. I told him what had transpired earlier and asked him to put a stop to the police harassment. He told me he would talk to the Police. I asked him if there was an order prohibiting me from entering Court No. 1. He told me that he was not aware of any such order. I told him in the presence of the Joint Registrar, Vigilance that I had no intention of going into Court No. 1 to further aggravate the situation.

After that I sat down in the 2nd floor bar room. The police constables continued to watch me. I asked them for their names so that I could name them in my written complaint. Two of the women constables including the one who threw me to the ground refused to identify themselves. At this point the women constables told me that they had done nothing to me and that they respected me and saw me in the court often. I was told by one of them that they knew I had filed a corruption case but in her words "sunne wala bhi toh hona chahiye" which translates as "the Judge should also be willing to hear the matter". They wanted me to come and sit with them. I told the women constables that I did not want to interact with them and they should stop following and harassing me. The constables continued to hover near me even after that. I moved towards the lift and they followed me and asked where I was going. I told them it was none of their business. At this time, these constables were trying to harass and goad me. I went down in the lift to the first floor and the women constables followed me.

I saw Inspector Negi sitting outside the Registrar General's office with another man in plain clothes. He gestured to the police constables to go back up to the second floor and they did that. Inspector Negi and the man accompanying him went in to see the Registrar General. I went in to see the Registrar General after Negi came out. I told the Registrar General in detail how I was being assaulted and harassed by the police. I told him what Judge Indermeet Kaur had told Inspector Negi. I told him the police was not only acting unlawfully but was also violating Justice Indermeet Kaur's directions. I also told the Registrar General that the woman who threw me to the ground was standing outside court 1 and I asked her if there was an order preventing me from entering court 1. She told me that she had been instructed to prevent me from entering court No. 1. I asked the Registrar General again if there was an order prohibiting me from entering court 1. He said he was not aware of the order. I told him that I did not intend to enter court 1 but I wanted to know that if I did enter Court 1, would the woman stationed outside Court 1 stop me. The Registrar General's reply was that he could not say whether the policewoman would or would not stop me from entering court 1. The Registrar General should explain this strange reply. I left after the Registrar General told me he would speak with the security and the police that very day to stop the harassment. Even after this, the police constables continued to harass and intimidate me throughout the rest of the day and during an early evening event at the Court that day.

Apart from a investigation into the attempt to murder me on February 17, 2012, I also want an investigation/ hearing on my complaint that you have committed and continue to commit contempt of your own court. I also want an investigation into the assault, intimidation and harassment by the police in the Delhi High Court on May 16, 2012. The police disobeyed directions from Justice Indemeet Kaur. They also otherwise acted in contempt of court and unlawfully interfered with my right to be present on the High Court premises and to appear in my matter in Court.

I also want to know in writing if you or anyone else gave any verbal or written order/ direction on May 16, 2012 that I be prevented from entering Court No. 1. Has such a direction been passed thereafter? If there is such a direction on what basis has it been given without hearing me? I reiterate that I do not wish to appear before you. But I do want to know if I am barred from entering Court 1 and on what basis? And I do want to challenge such an order or direction as unlawful.

The events in court 1 on the morning of May 16, 2012 were witnessed by a court room full of lawyers. I attempted to mention your involvement in the attempt to murder me on February 17, 2012. You refused to let me speak. Having participated in an attempt to murder me you had the gall to cover up this matter by stating that I was being paranoid. As I stated thereafter you have acted corruptly. You committed contempt of your court on February 17 and May 16, 2012. Let me also point out that after March 7, 2012, I wrote repeated letters to you on my matter. You did not bother to even give me a reply. I did not mention this matter in your court out of respect for your office even once from March 7 2012 until May 9, 2012 when I asked you for your reply on my request that CWP 1280 of 2012 be transferred from J. Hima Kohli to another judge. You finally recommended to her on that date that she recuse herself. Your failure to act on my request for transfer of CWP 1280 of 2012 for more than two months left me in a position of vulnerability with no recourse to file an interim application even though I was drugged and poisoned during this period. On May 14, I very briefly mentioned in your court that J. Sunil Gaur had recused himself. And then on May 16, I mentioned in your court that the matter being placed before a Sikh judge when influential members of this community were caught up in my complaints raised a reasonable apprehension of bias. So your statement in Court on May 16, 2012 that I was wasting judicial time is again an example of your dishonesty and corruption.

I have made an allegation backed up with facts and documents that you, a sitting High Court Judge, used your office in the attempt to murder me on February 17, 2012. Your status as a high court judge does not protect you from an investigation into an attempt to murder.

The police has attempted to intimidate me in the Delhi High even before May 16, 2012. The police was most likely involved in the attempts to drug/ poison me on the Delhi High court premises that I have complained about in my letters to you and on which topic I have again received no response. The police attempted to intimidate me in Court on March 2, March 3, March 5 and March 7, 2012 by unnecessarily and without any orders bringing police security constables into the court-room. A few days later I was speaking to lawyers and collecting emails so that I could bring my matter to the attention of the bar. An armed policeman stationed at the entrance left his position and followed me around the ground floor court lobby in an attempt to intimidate me. I have complained of police and intelligence agency complicity in the attacks against me and in the threat to my life.

On the night of May 16 - May 17, 2012 my front gate lock was broken by someone in a manner to prevent me from being able to open the gate and leave the house.

Seema Sapra

G 4 first floor

Jangpura Extension

New Delhi 110014

seema.sapra@gmail.com

Copies to –

1 Chief Justice of India, Justice S H Kapadia

2. Registrar General, Delhi High Court

3 Registrar Vigilance, Delhi High Court

4 Chairman and Council Members, Bar Council of Delhi

5 Chairman and Council Members, Bar Council of India

6 Full Executive Committee, Delhi High Court Bar Association

7 Mr. A. S. Chandhiok, Additional Solicitor General, Delhi High Court

8 Mr. Najmi Waziri, Standing Counsel, Govt. of Delhi, Delhi High Court

9 Justice Indermeet Kaur, Judge, Delhi High Court

10 Secretary General, Supreme Court of India

11 Mr. Brackett Denniston, General Counsel, General Electric Co.

12 Mr. Ghoolam Vahanvati, Attorney General of India

13 Secretary, Department of Justice, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India

14 Secretary, Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India"

11. All the above referred to letters (except the letter dated May 26, 2012) sent by the petitioner were filed by the petitioner in the present proceedings much before the present application.

12. The petitioner also refers to and relies upon copies of medical records which are already part of the court record in the present proceedings including "Additional Documents filed by Petitioner regarding complaints made in connection with denial of medical treatment and falsification of her medical records" dated April 16, 2012 filed by the petitioner.

13. It is clear from the facts and circumstances described above and from medical records before this Hon'ble Court that the petitioner was being drugged and poisoned in January and February 2012. As a result, the petitioner's lungs were poisoned and the petitioner had chemical pneumonia as evident from the Chest xray report dt. 20-02-2012 issued by Star Imaging & Path lab (available at page 279 of "Additional Documents filed by Petitioner regarding complaints made in connection with denial of medical treatment and falsification of her medical records" dated April 16, 2012 filed by the petitioner. The petitioner's ECG dated 22-02-2012 (at page 288 of the "Additional Documents filed by Petitioner regarding complaints made in connection with denial of medical treatment and falsification of her medical records" dated April 16, 2012) also establishes that she was being poisoned.

14. As the petitioner was under surveillance, both her consultations with specialists at this time were used to cover up the petitioner's symptoms of poisoning. The petitioner states that Dr Deepak Chaudhary who examined the petitioner on 20-2-2012 was pressurised into covering up the petitioner's symptoms. The petitioner went to Dr Deepak Chaudhary's clinic a few days before 20-2-2012 and was given an appointment and asked to wait. Then for no reason, Dr Deepak Chaudhary refused to see the petitioner and asked her to come on another day. The petitioner returned on 20 Feb 2012. When Dr Deepak Chaudhary placed the pulse oximeter on the petitioner's finger, the reading showed 95 (which is abnormal and a cause for concern). Dr Deepak Chaudhary then pressed a few buttons and then recorded the petitioner's oxygenation level as much higher. Dr Deepak Chaudhary's clinic has an xray machine and all chest xrays for his patients take place there. But the petitioner was lied to and told that this machine was not functional and that the petitioner should have her chest x-rayed outside the clinic. The petitioner did not go the radiology lab recommended by Dr Deepak Chaudhary but went elsewhere. Dr Deepak Chaudhary also had the petitioner sign on his prescription in front of him.

15. The petitioner also consulted Dr Raman Abhi at Artemis on 24-2-2012 but did not tell him the background of her complaint of poisoning. She merely described her symptoms as she wanted a chest xray report. The chest Xray ordered by Dr Raman Abhi at Artemis was also tampered with as can be established from the xray and report placed on record.

16. The petitioner points out that both the xray films for the chest xrays dated 20 and 24 Feb 2012 along with other records were removed from the petitioner's home in her absence during the illegal eviction on May 30, 2012.

17. The conspiracy and attempt to murder the petitioner on February 17, 2012 is clear from the facts described above.

18. This application is being made in the interest of justice. The contents of the Petition and other documents/ affidavits filed by the Petitioner are not being repeated herein for the sake of brevity, but may be read as part of this application.

19. The petitioner has filed this application to bring the gravity of the threat to her life to the attention of this court. The petitioner submits that she requires safe accommodation, protection, financial support and rehabilitation. The conspiracy and attempt to murder the petitioner on February 17, 2012 also needs investigation and prosecution. The Medical Councils of Delhi and India must also be impleaded in this matter and be directed to take appropriate penal action against Dr K G S Bansal.

PRAYER

It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to:

(a) Issue notice to the Medical Councils of Delhi and India and direct them to take cognizance of the petitioner's complaint against Dr K G S Bansal that he was party to a conspiracy and attempt to murder the petitioner on February 17, 2012;

(b) Direct the State respondents to investigate and prosecute the petitioner's complaint regarding the attempt to murder her on February 17, 201 2;

Place: New Delhi Petitioner in Person

January 10, 2012 Seema Sapra

Formerly resident at G 4, First Floor, Jangpura Extension New Delhi 110014,

Presently homeless after illegal eviction on May 30, 2012 in contempt of this Hon'ble Court's order dated May 25, 2012 and temporarily residing at Tashi Delek House, at Majnu Ka Tila

In the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi

Civil Writ Jurisdiction

C. M. Appl. No. 428 of 2013

Writ Petition No. 1280 of 2012

IN THE MATTER OF:

Seema Sapra …Petitioner

versus

General Electric Co. and Others ….Respondents

AFFIDAVIT

I, Seema Sapra, daughter of Late Shri A. R. Sapra, aged 41 years, previously resident of G 4, first floor, Jangpura Extension, New Delhi 110014 and presently homeless after illegal eviction on May 30, 2012 in contempt of this Hon'ble Court's order dated May 25, 2012 and temporarily residing at Tashi Delek House, at Majnu Ka Tila do hereby solemnly affirm and state as under:

1. I am the Petitioner in the present Petition and am well aware of the facts of the case and am competent to file the present affidavit.

2. I state that the contents of the accompanying application for orders under Section 151, Civil Procedure Code (in connection with the conspiracy and attempt to murder the petitioner on February 17, 2012) has been drafted by me and the facts stated therein are true and correct to my knowledge and nothing material has been concealed there-from and that the annexures to this application are true copies of their respective originals.

DEPONENT

VERIFICATION

Verified at New Delhi on this 10th day of January 2013, that the contents of the above affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge and that nothing material has been concealed there-from.

DEPONENT

In the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi

Civil Writ Jurisdiction

C.M. Appl. No. 428 of 2013

Writ Petition No. 1280 of 2012

IN THE MATTER OF:

Seema Sapra …Petitioner

versus

General Electric Co. and Others ….Respondents

INDEX

No. Particulars Pages

1 Urgent Application 1

2 Court Fees 2

3 C.M. No. of 2012

An application under Section 151 Civil Procedure Code for appropriate orders in connection with the conspiracy and attempt to murder the petitioner on February 17, 2012 (along with affidavit)

3-61

4 Annexure P-1 - Copies of three handwritten letters handed over by the petitioner to the office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court on February 17, 2012

62-74

Place: New Delhi Petitioner in Person

January 10, 2013 Seema Sapra

Seema Sapra - General Electric corruption whistle-blower: the Truth prevails

Pages

Monday 22 December 2014

No comments:

Post a Comment

My Blog List