-----Original Message-----
From: seema.sapra@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 08:15:57
To: <rg.dhc@nic.in>; pmosb<pmosb@gov.in>; <dcbi@cbi.gov.in>; Bhim Sain Bassi<cp.bsbassi@nic.in>; CHAIRMANOFFICE<CHAIRMANOFFICE@SEC.GOV>; <fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov>; <supremecourt@nic.in>
Reply-To: seema.sapra@gmail.com
Cc: Sapra<seemasapra@hotmail.com>; Seema<seema.sapra@gmail.com>
Subject: Complaint of judicial corruption against Judge Sistani and Judge Pathak of the Delhi High Court in connection with WP Civil 1280 of 2012, a corruption whistleblower case (Seema Sapra v General Electric Company and Ors.)
To the President Pranab Mukherjee, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court,
I am writing further to my complaint of judicial corruption against J Sistani and J Pathak for their ongoing attempts to cover up corruption complaints against General Electric Company and Montek Singh Ahluwalia and to cover up my having been poisoned and their participation in facilitating the conspiracy and attempts to eliminate me.
My inquiries from court staff and registry staff including conversations with Mr Ravindra Kumar Sharma (Assistant Registrar), Mr H C Rawal (Joint Registrar) and Mr Anil K Kaushal (Registrar), the dealing assistants Pravin and Joshi, Anil Jain- J. Sistani's court master, and the court master of J. Pathak (who refused to provide his name when I asked for it) have revealed that J. Sistani gave verbal instructions to his court master which were then conveyed to the dealing assistant (Pravin) by the court peon of J. Sistani's court that the complete court file in WP Civil 1280/12 not be sent to his court for the scheduled court hearings on 25 September 2014 and 10 November 2014. J. Sistani gave oral instructions that only volume 1 and volume 32 be sent to him by the registry along with Part B of the court file.
J. Pathak also received only volume 1, volume 32 and Part B of the court record in WP Civil 1280/12. It is evident that both J. Pathak and J. Sistani corruptly agreed to avoid having to peruse the court record in WP Civil 1280/12 in this manner.
Delhi High Court rules require that the complete court record in any matter be transferred from the registry to the concerned court one day prior to the scheduled court hearing in a matter.
Even a Judge cannot direct that the court file not be sent to his/her court if the matter is listed before the Judge.
J. Sistani and J. Pathak could not therefore even pass written orders that my court file not be sent to their courts.
Instead with corrupt and malafide intent, J Sistani and J Pathak misused their court staff and behind my back gave oral instructions that the pleadings in WP Civil 1280/12 not be transfered to their staff by the court registry even for scheduled court hearings.
After sabotaging my court hearings in this manner, and effectively denying me any hearing at all, J. Sistani and J Pathak actively misled me in court on 10 November 2014 by acting as if the parts of the court record I was requesting them to read were present in court. After conspiring and ensuring that the court record in my matter not even reach them, J. Sistani and J. Pathak have been making broad brush declarations in court about my matter, without hearing me and as is now established without reading the court record. These declarations by these judges appear to have been made on instructions received from persons who have access to these judges and who are helping General Electric cover up my corruption complaints and my complaints of poisoning.
J. Sistani and J. Pathak have not been permitting me to speak in court.
J Sistani and J Pathak have repeatedly stated in court on more than one hearing that my writ petition has become infructuous because the 2010 Madhepura and Marhowra tenders have been cancelled. These statements are being made by these judges without any hearing and also without reading pending court applications and court pleadings. Arguments on merits in this matter have still to commence before J Sistani and J Pathak.
I also point out that complaints of corruption in a tender by a bidder do not get washed away simply by that tender being cancelled. Especially when the corruption pointed out, continues to plague and infect the subsequent retendering process as well. The writ petition includes a prayer for blacklisting GE for corruption. Legal consequences of corruption, fraud and forgery in a tender cannot be avoided by mere cancellation of the tender and by initiation of a fresh tender where the bidder who indulged in the corrupt dealings continues to enjoy the benefits of that corruption.
Yet J Sistani and J Pathak are overly eager to disregard corruption complaints and evidence before them, ignore prayers for the reliefs of blacklisting, investigation and prosecution and are repeatedly asserting (even without the PMO or Rail Ministry contending this on affidavit) that this writ need not be decided because the 2010 tenders have been cancelled. This despite evidence and averments on the court record that the cancellation of the tenders was at the instance of the very persons involved in the corruption, and was nothing but a malafide device to over-reach the court and an attempt to cover up the corruption complaints before the court and an attempt to avoid the due process of law and to avoid the adjudication of the writ petition on merits and the investigation of the corruption complaints and a malafide attempt to permit General Electric to continue to bid for the same Project despite evidence of General Electric's corruption.
This morning toxic chemical fumes and some poisonous gas were again released into my hotel room forcing me to check out.
Some chemical has also been introduced into my car when it was parked outside this hotel.
Seema Sapra
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone
No comments:
Post a Comment