Fw: Stay at Sundeep Inn and Delhi High Court protection order

Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone

---

From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>

Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 12:24:55 +0530

To: <info@sundeepinn.com>; pmosb@nic.in<pmosb@nic.in>; Bhim Sain Bassi<cp.bsbassi@nic.in>; rg.dhc@nic.in<rg.dhc@nic.in>; dcbi@cbi.gov.in<dcbi@cbi.gov.in>; complaintcell-ncw@nic.in<complaintcell-ncw@nic.in>; supremecourt@nic.in<supremecourt@nic.in>

Cc: Seema<seema.sapra@gmail.com>; Sapra<seemasapra@hotmail.com>

Subject: Stay at Sundeep Inn and Delhi High Court protection order

I am a lawyer who has filed a corruption case. Please see the Delhi High court Order below directing the Police Commissioner to provide me protection. 

I will be checking out today. 

Someone most likely your staff have beeb spraying chemicals under my room door. The corridoroutside the room door is also stinking with chemicals. Please have this stopped. 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
  
  
W.P.(C) 1280/2012 and CM APPL. Nos. 2770/2012, 7012/2012, 7175-  76/2012, 8677/2012, 8856/2012, 18642/2012, 19370/2012, 19501/2012,   19683/2012, 19820/2012, 105/2013, 326/2013, 428/2013, 522/2013,   1223/2013, 1679/2013, 2477/2013, 3380/2013, 3855/2013, 10492-93/2013
  

SEEMA SAPRA ..... Petitioner   
Through: Petitioner in person
  
versus
  
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. AND ORS. ..... Respondents
  
Through: Mr. N. Ganpathy and Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Advocates for respondent Nos.1, 6 and 7

Mr. A.K. Singh, proxy counsel for Mr. R.V. Sinha, Advocate for CVC/R-2
Mr. P.K. Singh, Advocate for
Mr. R.N. Singh, Advocate for R-4
Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ASC for Delhi Police with Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocate
Ms. Sapna Chauhan, Adv. for UOI
Mr. A.K. Singh and Mr. Bakul Jain, Advocates for Mr. P.K. Sharma, Standing counsel for CBI
Mr. P.V. Saravana Raja and Mr. Abhilashattri, proxy counsels for
Mr. C. Mukuns and Mr. Firdouse Qutbwani, Advocates for R-13
Ms. Archna, Advocate for R-16
  
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
  
O R D E R
  
10.01.2014
    
Today, at the outset, the petitioner made a submission for adjourning the matter as she has made a request to the Chief Justice of India as well as to the Chief Justice of this Court for transfer of this writ petition to the Hon?ble Supreme Court for hearing. We, however, rejected the request for adjournment. So the petitioner has made further submissions in the matter. Due to paucity of time matter is adjourned to 24th January, 2014 for further submission.
  
Today Mr. Dayan Krishnan, learned counsel for the Delhi Police submitted that on an independent assessment of the situation the police has come to the conclusion that there is no immediate threat perception to the petitioner as she has been projecting every now and then and therefore, now it should be left to the discretion of the police authorities as to whether any protection is to be provided to her or not depending upon the inputs which the police may get. The petitioner strongly refutes this submission. Considering all the facts and circumstances we are not inclined to withdraw our earlier orders directing the police to extend full protection to the life and liberty of the petitioner till further orders of this Court.
  
P.K. BHASIN, J
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
  
  
JANUARY 10, 2014/pg

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:21 AM, <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:

Pls see the attached receipt for Rs 3000 that I paid yesterday as advance.


The tariff quoted to me was Rs 3000 all inclusive.

Pls keep my invoice ready reflecting this payment made and showing that the bill has been settled.

I will be checking out today.

Seema Sapra
Sent on my BlackBerry® from Vodafone