For the last one hour, some acrid fumes and some other toxic chemical is being released into my hotel room at Hotel Oscar.
Seema Sapra
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:35 PM
Subject: My stay at Hotel Oscar
To: fom@hoteloscar.in, info@hoteloscar.in, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@gmail.com>, Seema Sapra <seemasapra@hotmail.com>
From: Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:35 PM
Subject: My stay at Hotel Oscar
To: fom@hoteloscar.in, info@hoteloscar.in, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@gmail.com>, Seema Sapra <seemasapra@hotmail.com>
I am a lawyer who has filed a corruption case in the Delhi High Court and I refer to the following court order directing the Police Commissioner to provide me protection. There is a grave and immediate threat to my life and specifically I am being targeted by being exposed to poisonous chemical agents and gases.
"IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 1280/2012 and CM APPL. Nos. 2770/2012, 7012/2012, 7175- 76/2012, 8677/2012, 8856/2012, 18642/2012, 19370/2012, 19501/2012, 19683/2012, 19820/2012, 105/2013, 326/2013, 428/2013, 522/2013, 1223/2013, 1679/2013, 2477/2013, 3380/2013, 3855/2013, 10492-93/2013
SEEMA SAPRA ..... Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person
versus
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. N. Ganpathy and Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Advocates for
respondent Nos.1, 6 and 7
Mr. A.K. Singh, proxy counsel for Mr. R.V. Sinha, Advocate for CVC/R-2
Mr. P.K. Singh, Advocate for
Mr. R.N. Singh, Advocate for R-4
Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ASC for Delhi Police with Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocate
Ms. Sapna Chauhan, Adv. for UOI
Mr. A.K. Singh and Mr. Bakul Jain, Advocates for Mr. P.K. Sharma,
Standing counsel for CBI
Mr. P.V. Saravana Raja and Mr. Abhilashattri, proxy counsels for
Mr. C. Mukuns and Mr. Firdouse Qutbwani, Advocates for R-13
Ms. Archna, Advocate for R-16
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
O R D E R
10.01.2014
Today, at the outset, the petitioner made a submission for adjourning
the matter as she has made a request to the Chief Justice of India as
well as to the Chief Justice of this Court for transfer of this writ
petition to the Hon?ble Supreme Court for hearing. We, however,
rejected the request for adjournment. So the petitioner has made
further submissions in the matter. Due to paucity of time matter is
adjourned to 24th January, 2014 for further submission.
Today Mr. Dayan Krishnan, learned counsel for the Delhi Police
submitted that on an independent assessment of the situation the
police has come to the conclusion that there is no immediate threat
perception to the petitioner as she has been projecting every now and
then and therefore, now it should be left to the discretion of the
police authorities as to whether any protection is to be provided to
her or not depending upon the inputs which the police may get. The
petitioner strongly refutes this submission. Considering all the facts
and circumstances we are not inclined to withdraw our earlier orders
directing the police to extend full protection to the life and liberty
of the petitioner till further orders of this Court.
P.K. BHASIN, J
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JANUARY 10, 2014"
"IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 1280/2012 and CM APPL. Nos. 2770/2012, 7012/2012, 7175- 76/2012, 8677/2012, 8856/2012, 18642/2012, 19370/2012, 19501/2012, 19683/2012, 19820/2012, 105/2013, 326/2013, 428/2013, 522/2013, 1223/2013, 1679/2013, 2477/2013, 3380/2013, 3855/2013, 10492-93/2013
SEEMA SAPRA ..... Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person
versus
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. N. Ganpathy and Mr. Manpreet Lamba, Advocates for
respondent Nos.1, 6 and 7
Mr. A.K. Singh, proxy counsel for Mr. R.V. Sinha, Advocate for CVC/R-2
Mr. P.K. Singh, Advocate for
Mr. R.N. Singh, Advocate for R-4
Mr. Dayan Krishnan, ASC for Delhi Police with Ms. Manvi Priya, Advocate
Ms. Sapna Chauhan, Adv. for UOI
Mr. A.K. Singh and Mr. Bakul Jain, Advocates for Mr. P.K. Sharma,
Standing counsel for CBI
Mr. P.V. Saravana Raja and Mr. Abhilashattri, proxy counsels for
Mr. C. Mukuns and Mr. Firdouse Qutbwani, Advocates for R-13
Ms. Archna, Advocate for R-16
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. BHASIN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
O R D E R
10.01.2014
Today, at the outset, the petitioner made a submission for adjourning
the matter as she has made a request to the Chief Justice of India as
well as to the Chief Justice of this Court for transfer of this writ
petition to the Hon?ble Supreme Court for hearing. We, however,
rejected the request for adjournment. So the petitioner has made
further submissions in the matter. Due to paucity of time matter is
adjourned to 24th January, 2014 for further submission.
Today Mr. Dayan Krishnan, learned counsel for the Delhi Police
submitted that on an independent assessment of the situation the
police has come to the conclusion that there is no immediate threat
perception to the petitioner as she has been projecting every now and
then and therefore, now it should be left to the discretion of the
police authorities as to whether any protection is to be provided to
her or not depending upon the inputs which the police may get. The
petitioner strongly refutes this submission. Considering all the facts
and circumstances we are not inclined to withdraw our earlier orders
directing the police to extend full protection to the life and liberty
of the petitioner till further orders of this Court.
P.K. BHASIN, J
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
JANUARY 10, 2014"
After I checked in, a hotel staff deliberately tampered with the TV and set top box in my room. He interchanged the leads, incorrect inserted the card and damaged it.
As a result the TV in my room is not working.
I selected this room after looking at 3 other rooms.
I was later told by Mr Madhusudan that I could move to another room. But I do not wish to do this for safety reasons.
I am concerned that damaging the TV deliberately was a ploy to make me change rooms.
I do not want to change my room.
As the TV is my room is not working, I want a refund. I paid Rs 2800 as advance when I checked it. Kindly refund Rs 800 from that amount to me
Seema Sapra
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
A hotel staff deliberately tampered with it. It was working. He suddenly took out the card and reinserted it incorrectly. He also interchanged some leads n the set top box.It is now over 30 minutes since the TV is not working.Kindly refund Rs 800 on this account.Seema Sapra
No comments:
Post a Comment