Saturday 23 March 2013

Petition to the Chief Justice of India by General Electric whistleblower


I again spent last night in my car. This is now twenty-five nights in a row that I have been forced to spend in my car because Justice Gita Mittal and Justice J R Midha (of the Delhi High Court) have not found time to hear my applications for witness protection and safe housing. Both these judges know that I am being compelled to spend the night in my car.

I have handed over the petition reproduced below today at the Supreme Court of India and at the High Court of Delhi for the Chief Justice of India (Justice Altamas Kabir) and the Chief Justice of the High Court (Justice Murugesan).



23 March 2013

 

 

To:

 

  1. Justice Altamas Kabir, Chief Justice of India

Supreme Court of India

 

  1. Justice Murugesan, Chief Justice of the High Court of Delhi

Delhi High Court

 

  1. Bar Council of Delhi

 

 

 

 

Ref: woman lawyer whistleblower in W.P. 1280/ 2012 (Seema Sapra v. General Electric and Company) pending in the Delhi High Court

 

 

 

Dear Sir/ Madam,

 

 

I am a woman lawyer enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi. My enrolment number is D/1159/1995.

 

A copy of my curriculum vitae is enclosed.

 

I am a whistleblower in a corruption and right to life petition (W.P. (C ) 1280/ 2012) filed against General Electric which is pending in the Delhi High Court. My life is in grave danger. I have been drugged and poisoned in the past. My lungs have also been poisoned by exposing me to toxic chemicals and fumes. I have been rendered homeless and penniless with intent to force me against my will into an institution like a government run shelter home where I can be locked up and drugged, poisoned and eliminated. I am being defamed, harassed, and victimised including by certain members of the bar. Lawyers are being pressurised not to help me or to allow me to work. My applications in W.P. (Civil) 1280/ 2012 seeking protection, housing, and financial assistance have not been heard for over one year.

 

I have been sleeping in my car for the last twenty three nights, am under constant surveillance and am being harassed on a daily basis by the Police and by private security professionals working for General Electric. The police has failed to comply with and has instead committed contempt of a protection order dated 25 May 2012 passed by the Delhi High Court in W.P. (Civil) 1280/ 2012.

 

I am writing to you in connection with a complaint of sexual harassment that I suffered at the hands of Mr Soli J Sorabjee in the year 2001 when he was Attorney General of India and I was a young lawyer working in his chambers as well as a complaint of sexual harassment against Mr Raian Karanjawala which led and caused me to quit my job at Karanjawala & Co. in the late 1990s.

 

The over 10-year old complaints of sexual harassment against Mr Soli J Sorabjee and Mr Raian Karanjawala have come to light because of my victimisation (including surveillance of my private phone conversations) on account of my whistleblower complaints against General Electric. The threat to my life also emanates from Mr Soli J. Sorabjee and Mr Raian Karanjawala who have also helped General Electric in covering up my whistleblower complaints.

 

I enclose herewith a true copy of CM 2477/ 2013 filed by me in Writ Petition (Civil) 1280 of 2012 pending in the High Court of Delhi.

 

In this applications filed in the Delhi High Court and supported by a sworn affidavit, I have described in detail the sexual harassment that I was subjected to by Mr Soli J Sorabjee in 2001. I have also briefly mentioned an incident that took place during my employment at Karanjawala & Co which caused and led me to quit my job at Karanjawala & Co in the late 1990s.

 

In communications addressed to the President of India and the Prime Minister of India and in CM 2477/ 2013 (filed in the Delhi High Court in W.P. (C ) 1280/ 2012), I have sought redressal of my complaint of sexual harassment against Mr Soli J Sorabjee from the Government of India in accordance with the directions of the Supreme Court of India in its judgments in the cases of Vishaka and Medha Kotwal Lele.

 

A recent news report states that a group of women lawyers has petitioned the Chief Justice of India to constitute a redressal mechanism for complaints of sexual harassments by women lawyers.  

 

I am petitioning all of you for redressal of my complaints of sexual harassment against Mr Soli J Sorabjee and Mr Raian Karanjawala.

 

I reproduce below the relevant paragraphs from the enclosed applications describing my complaints of sexual harassment against Mr Soli J Sorabjee and Mr Raian Karanjawala.  

 

“In addition, the danger to the petitioner’s life has become aggravated and the petitioner also faces a threat to her life from two very powerful lawyers in India, Mr Soli J Sorabjee and Mr Raian N Karanjawala. The petitioner worked with Mr Raian Karanjawala from 1995 until around 1999/2000. She worked with Mr Soli J Sorabjee for a little less than a year in 2000-2001. After the petitioner made her whistleblower complaints against General Electric in August and September of 2010, the petitioner was drugged for a whole year without the petitioner even realizing that she was in danger or that she was being drugged. During this period, the petitioner’s phone was also being tapped. In April and May of 2011, the petitioner during a phone conversation with an old college (former) friend (Sushmita Chaudhary) talked about the sexual harassment she had experienced when she worked with Mr Raian Karanjawala and with Mr Soli Sorabjee. Unknown to the petitioner at that time, her phones were being tapped and therefore this conversation got recorded. This fact has aggravated the threat to the petitioner’s life as powerful members of the legal bar, Mr Raian Karanjawala and Mr Soli J Sorabjee now have a personal reason to eliminate/  harm the petitioner.

 

The petitioner worked in Mr Raian Karanjawala’a law firm from 1995 until around 1999/ 2000. The petitioner was doing very well there professionally. In around 1998/ 1999 the petitioner was handling Lufthansa as a client of the firm. A criminal court in Kolkatta issued summons to some senior executives from Lufthansa’s head office in Germany. The petitioner was handling this case and in connection with the court hearings, travelled to Kolkatta frequently. On some of these trips, the petitioner was accompanied by Mr Raian Karanjawala. On one such trip, the petitioner was part of Mr Karanjawala’s group of friends having a late night dinner and after dinner coffee/ drinks at the Chinese restaurant in the Taj Bengal. The group including the petitioner was drinking red wine. The group dispersed at around 1/2 am and the petitioner walked back to her room with Mr Karanjawala who was headed to his room. When the petitioner reached her room, Mr Karanjawala casually asked the petitioner if she wanted to join him for a night-cap. The petitioner was a little drunk and was also very tired and sleepy. She therefore replied without any thought that she wanted to sleep and therefore would not join Mr Karanjawala. The next day, the petitioner felt a bit awkward but soon the petitioner forgot about this episode. The petitioner did not give further thought to the incident. After this incident, the petitioner’s assignments at Karanjawala & company started to get curtailed. The petitioner did not connect this with the incident at the Taj Bengal. The petitioner started to face other impediments to her work at Karanjawala & Co. Mr Raian Karanjawala misled the petitioner that her position was being challenged by other colleagues like Ms Nandini Gore and Ms Ruby Ahuja. The petitioner eventually decided to move on from this law firm but at that time the petitioner did not connect all of this with the Taj Bengal incident and continued to think of Mr Raian Karanjawala as her well-wisher.  (There was strong gossip at Karanjawala & Co about an intimate relationship between Mr Raian Karanjawala and another lawyer, Ms Nandini Gore. This gossip extended to the extent of claiming that Ms Nandini Gore’s son was actually Mr Raian Karanjawala’s son.)

 

The petitioner worked with Mr Soli J Sorabjee in 2000-2001 when Mr Soli Sorabjee was Attorney General of India. In fact, the petitioner decided to work with Mr Soli J Sorabjee (who was at that time the Attorney General) on the recommendation and suggestion of Mr Raian Karanjawala.  The petitioner was sexually harassed by Mr Soli J Sorabjee when she worked with him. The harassment started with Mr Soli Sorabjee touching the petitioner seemingly innocently and then progressed to situations where he would hold the petitioner’s hand. Mr Sorabjee was already quite old (about 70 years) when the petitioner started working with him therefore initially the petitioner was too embarrassed to say anything. But the situation became very uncomfortable. Mr Soli J Sorabjee would grasp the petitioner’s hand in front of other staff and colleagues as soon as the group reached the second floor of the Supreme Court building (where the Attorney General has his office) from the first floor where the courts are located. The petitioner found this very uncomfortable but refrained from saying anything or withdrawing her hand at the risk of offending Mr Sorabjee. The petitioner feared that Mr Sorabjee’s acts could still be passed off as those of an affectionate older person towards a young junior lawyer. After sometime, the harassment progressed and Mr Sorabjee started asking the petitioner to come to his Motilal Nehru Marg official residence and to his Niti Bagh residence ostensibly for work both in the afternoons and sometimes late in the evening. (Mr Sorabjee would specify for instance that the petitioner not arrive before 7 or 8 pm in the evening). During these visits, Mr Sorabjee would pretend to be working on a sofa sometimes in his study at Niti Bagh but occasionally in his bedrooms at Niti Bagh and at Motilal Nehru Marg. The petitioner would be asked to sit on the sofa with Mr Sorabjee. During these interactions between discussions of work, Mr Sorabjee would lean over and touch the petitioner’s head, legs and arms etc. He would sometimes lean over to put his arms around the petitioner and the embrace would get extended with Mr Sorabjee engaging in prolonged rubbing of his cheeks against the petitioner’s face etc. The petitioner was very uncomfortable with all this but since she knew that she was soon leaving India for further studies, and since she apprehended that her raising the issue would result in dismissal of her complaints in the absence of proof as to the nature of these interactions, the petitioner said nothing. The petitioner did try and maintain as much distance as possible, always trying to keep the conversation focused on work and to avoid saying or doing anything to convey an impression that she welcomed/ condoned these advances.

 

On one particular evening, Mr Sorabjee invited the petitioner to his Niti Bagh residence in the evening around 7.30/ 8 pm on the pretext of some work. Mr Sorabjee was sitting in his study and asked the petitioner to sit with him on the sofa, Mr Sorabjee asked the petitioner to join him for dinner and offered her wine. The petitioner consumed 2-3 glasses of wine with Mr Sorabjee regularly topping up her glass without asking her. After sometime, Mr Sorabjee was sitting very close to the petitioner. He said something affectionate and then embraced the petitioner. The petitioner waited for Mr Sorabjee to withdraw, when suddenly she found that Mr Sorabjee was kissing the petitioner on her lips and almost immediately had inserted his tongue into her mouth. The petitioner started saying that she had to leave and tried to gently push Mr Sorabjee away. At this Mr Sorabjee withdrew. The petitioner then told him that it was late and she had a long drive back home and the petitioner hurriedly left.

 

The next time the petitioner saw Mr Sorabjee, she tried to maintain a calm, composed and stern/ distant manner. Mr Sorabjee was even on that occasion sitting in his study at Neeti Bagh, but it was daytime and there were several persons around outside his study and in his office. The petitioner did not bring up what had happened but Mr Sorabjee opened his hand and handed an ear-ring back to the petitioner telling her she had lost it the other evening. The petitioner said yes that it had probably fallen off on the sofa. Mr Sorabjee stated that Ambore (his domestic help) had found the ear-ring under the bed in Mr Sorabjee’s bedroom. The petitioner knew that the ear-ring did not fall off under the bed because the petitioner’s encounter with Mr Sorabjee took place on the sofa in the study. Yet the petitioner refrained from replying. The petitioner perceived Mr Soli Sorabjee’s lie about the ear-ring having been found in the bedroom by his male domestic help as a threatening statement being made to the petitioner. The petitioner recalls that she was apprehensive that this male domestic help might talk about having found the petitioner’s ear-ring in Mr Sorabjee’s bedroom to the office staff and that word of this would leak out and that persons hearing this would conclude that the petitioner had sex with Mr Sorabjee in his bedroom. For this and other reasons, the petitioner kept quiet and did not raise the issue with Mr Sorabjee, nor did she mention this to anyone else.  The petitioner left her position with Mr Sorabjee soon after this and left for the United Kingdom in September 2001. Mr Sorabjee made several calls on the petitioner’s phone in the UK, but the petitioner recalls feeling anger and not wishing to interact with Mr Sorabjee, she did not initially answer these persistent calls.  Eventually the petitioner’s anger subsided and having spent nearly 7 years overseas, the petitioner was able to put the episode with Mr Soli Sorabjee behind her and was able to interact with him on a casual basis. The petitioner recalls that during one of her short trips to India when she was living overseas, the petitioner was told by Mr Raian Karanjawala that Mr Soli J Sorabjee was “upset” that the petitioner had not kept in touch with the latter. In her future dealings with Mr Sorabjee, the petitioner always felt empowered and in control of the situation to be able to draw the boundaries of any interaction firmly. After the incident in Mr Soli Sorabjee’s house, the petitioner took the decision that she did not want this sexual harassment to affect or influence her life in any manner. Accordingly the petitioner did not mention this harassment to anyone including to her family until that phone conversation in 2011, where the petitioner talked about this sexual harassment. Unfortunately for the petitioner, this phone conversation was intercepted (as a result of the petitioner being under surveillance because of her corruption complaints against General Electric) and was relayed back to Mr Soli Sorabjee and to Mr Raian Karanjawala.

 

Soon after this phone conversation, Ms Anupam Sanghi threatened the petitioner on the phone that the petitioner was saying everyone had harassed her and that if she went to court against General Electric then she would find that Judges were harassing her.”

 

I have also sent the complaints about the sexual harassment that I suffered at the hands of Mr Soli J Sorabjee in 2001 when he was Attorney General of India.to the President of India and to the Prime Minister of India.

 

I enclose a DVD with a copy of the court record of Writ Petition (Civil) 1280 of 2012.

 

Also enclosed are copies of the following documents filed by me in the last few days in W.P (C ) 1280 of 2012 and in a connected matter OMP 647/ 2012, both pending in the Delhi High Court.

 

 

  1. Application (IA 3312/ 2013) filed by me in OMP 647/ 2012 on 22 February 2013

 

  1. Application (IA 4729/ 2013) filed by me in OMP 647/ 2012 on 14 March 2013

 

  1. Application (IA 4813/ 2013) filed by me in OMP 647/ 2013 on 18 March 2013

 

  1. Affidavit filed by me in OMP 647/ 2012 on 19 March 2013

 

  1. Application filed by me in W.P. (C ) 1280 of 2012 on 21 March 2013 which is scheduled to come up for hearing before the Delhi High Court on 1 April 2013

 

  1. Copy of complaint dated 5 March 2013 against Delhi High Court Registry officials misconduct and corruption in connection with W.P. (C )1280/ 2012 and connected matters

 

  1. Recent emails sent by me to the Supreme Court of India, the Delhi High Court, the Commissioner of Police, the National Human Rights Commission and several other authorities

 

 

For the reasons set out in IA 3312/ 2013 and 4813/ 2013 filed in OMP 647/ 2012, I request that OMP 647/ 2012 in the Delhi High Court be transferred from Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw and be listed before another Bench. IA 4813/ 2013 was listed before Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw on 21 March 2013, when for unexplained reasons he again simply adjourned the application without a decision to 2 April 2013.

 

The Bench presently hearing W.P. (Civil) 1280/ 2012 is also not inclined to hear this matter as is evident from its order dated 4 February 2013 which is enclosed. This order mis-records that I asked for the writ-petition to be decided immediately. I instead requested that my urgent applications, (pending for more than 12 and 6 months without hearing) be heard expeditiously. I told the court that I had been rendered homeless and was being poisoned. This order dated 4 February 2013 also mis-records the prayers in the writ petition. Further this order again brings up the question of the constitution of a Special Bench (which was rejected as infeasible by the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court after a reference to him on this issue by Justice Nandrajog and Justice Veena Birbals’s order dated 16 January 2013). I had also petitioned against the constitution of a Special Bench to Chief Justice Murugesan by letter dated February 17, 2013.

 

Meanwhile, while the hearing on my interim applications for protection, housing and financial assistance in W.P. (Civil) 1280/ 2012 continues to be delayed, I am being physically harmed, and having to request lawyers for money to survive on. I am literally living on the street for the last 23 days. The circumstances I am in, places me in even greater danger including danger from the Police. With the court holidays next week, I fear that I might be harmed, eliminated or incapacitated in some manner. General Electric has filed a sur-rejoinder in W.P. 1280/ 2012 today on the last day before the court closes. The earlier pattern of filings by General Electric in this matter, shows that they have timed their affidavits to filings before court vacations or to other situations when I have been vulnerable and then attempted to physically disable me from responding to their false affidavits by poisoning me. I fear that I might be poisoned during the court vacations next week so as to incapacitate me and to prevent me from responding to this new false, perjurious and unauthorised affidavit filed by AZB & Partners.

 

The order passed by Justice Gita Mittal and Juastice Midha on 4 February 2013   expresses their inability to hear this matter until 16 May 2013. This matter is unlikely to be heard on 16 May 2013 which is the busiest time of the calendar year for the High Court being two weeks before the summer vacations. The court roster will change after the summer vacations so it is more than likely that as a result of the order dated 4 February 2013, the Bench of Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Midha will not hear this writ petition.

 

This order also states that pleadings are still to be completed. (Yet this court on 18 March 2013 delayed issuance of notice to Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, a necessary party until 16 May 2013.) It is submitted that my urgent applications for protection, housing, financial assistance, and seeking an end to the ongoing victimisation/ harassment need to be heard and it is not necessary for pleadings to be completed before adequate orders are passed protecting my life and person and putting a stop to the continued infringement of my right to life on a daily basis.

 

The only substantive direction given by the Bench of Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Midha is to question on 27 February 2013, the maintainability of my application seeking redress of my complaint of sexual harassment against Mr Soli Sorabjee. This application 2477/ 2013 is clearly maintainable yet Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Midha not only questioned the maintainability of this application without any one appearing for any of the respondents but also placed this issue for hearing on a separate and earlier date. Justice Gita Mittal specifically asked her court master to list this application separately from the other applications in the writ petition.

 

On 27 February 2013, I also told Justice Gita Mittal that I had spent the previous night in my car and had come to court un-bathed and unchanged. This fact did not receive any consideration by Justice Gita Mittal who failed to record this in her order despite my request.

 

Instead of hearing my applications, Justice Gita Mittal on 27 February 2013 made a casual suggestion without even hearing me on the nature of the threat to my life, that the court could direct the Ministry of Women and Child Development to see if I was eligible for one of their “schemes”. I had to vigorously oppose this. This Ministry only runs schemes like Nari Niketans and protective homes and hostels and these are exactly the kinds of places where I will be at the greatest risk by being placed in/ under the so-called custody/ care of wardens who can be used to speak on my behalf, to victimise me further, and to cover up any further harm that may be caused to me. Forcing me into institutions of this nature will only victimise me further. I am before the Court seeking witness protection with very powerful interests including General Electric and interests within the government who would like to eliminate me, drug me or falsely label me mentally ill. I want the court to direct the Government of India to protect me as a witness and a whistleblower. If I am protected and acknowledged by the court as a whistleblower, I will be able to work, earn. and arrange suitable accommodation.  Instead of hearing my applications and passing orders based upon the facts and evidence before them, Justice Gita Mittal and Justice Midha made a suggestion on 27 February 2013 that was ad-hoc, casual in its approach, not based upon or derived from or shaped by the facts, evidence, pleadings and prayers before them, detrimental to my interests, and which would essentially have resulted in a low-level bureaucrat in the Ministry for Women and Child Development determining my fate.

 

I told Justice Gita Mittal that I am not a destitute woman but a highly qualified and competent lawyer who is a whistleblower and a witness to crimes who requires witness protection. I am being victimised, defamed, and am not being permitted to earn a living or to live in safe accommodation. This victimisation is being made possible mainly by the delay in hearing of the writ proceedings.  My life and person continues to be at risk, because the Delhi High Court has delayed even preliminary hearings in W.P. 1280/ 2012 and in pending applications for over a year, and because of repeated attempts by General Electric and the State respondents to cover up the corruption complaints and to sabotage the writ proceedings by filing false and unauthorised affidavits. Instead of getting the acknowledgement, respect and protection that I deserve and need as a whistleblower, I am being hounded and systematically destroyed while the writ petition continues to remain unheard.

 

I apprehend that the intent is to delay the hearing of this writ petition until I am fully incapacitated or eliminated. If this writ petition had been heard promptly, I would not be in the precarious circumstances that I am in today. I fear that I will be harmed, harassed and victimised in the court vacations next week.

 

There is another issue. I have stated and produced evidence in the writ petition that medical doctors at Apollo hospital, two Max Healthcare hospitals and at the Delhi High Court dispensary were used to cover up my symptoms and complaints of poisoning and to harm me by falsifying my medical records and by writing harmful prescriptions.  There are original Xray and ultrasound films in support of these complaints which were removed from my home on 30 May 2012 with police participation. These medical records have not been returned to me despite an application seeking this relief filed by me in July 2012 which has remained unheard. My applications seeking impleadment of the Medical Council of India and the Medical Council of Delhi in W.P. 1280 of 2012 have also not been heard.

 

I have also produced evidence that on 17 February 2012, the office of the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court was used in a conspiracy and attempt to murder me before W.P. (C ) 1280/ 2012 was filed.

 

The Delhi High Court has even failed to look at these facts and the evidence produced in W.P. 1280 of 2012. Yet Justice Gita Mittal on 4 February 2012 (when I mentioned the writ petition before her Bench after lunch on 4 February 2013 seeking an early hearing at least on my applications for protection and housing after her Bench had adjourned the matter to 16 May 2013 in the morning) very casually told me that she could ask a medical board to examine me. She then went on to make an astonishing suggestion that I could seek this medical opinion accompanied by Mrs Neelam Katara who was at that time present in her court as a client and who I had never set eyes on before. I told Justice Gita Mittal that I first wanted my medical records returned to me and I first wanted a hearing and ruling on my complaints in W.P. 1280 of 2012 that medical doctors had been earlier used in attempts to eliminate me. I also told Justice Gita Mittal that toxicology tests on the day would establish poisoning. I showed her the swelling in my neck and swollen lymph nodes in my neck all consistent with inflammatory responses to toxic chemicals.

 

General Electric has a very strong influence on the private and public medical sector in India because of its healthcare business and because it also finances the healthcare business. For instance General Electric has extremely close ties to Medanta, Max, Apollo and Fortis hospitals. Almost every radiologist in this city has close ties to General Electric because they use General Electric manufactured equipment. Mr Montek Singh Ahluwalia also has a very significant influence on the medical sector in India. General Electric and the government are falsely trying to label me mentally ill. They would very much like to have me examined by a psychiatrist who could be used to falsely label me mentally ill.  

 

With this background, is it not inappropriate for the court to so casually make statements and suggestions that could in fact place me in danger and in the hands of doctors influenced/ bribed by General Electric and the State? These doctors if given a free-wheeling liberty to examine me, could label me mentally ill, diagnose me with a false illness, create a false medical history etc.

 

Under these circumstances, I am entitled to be in control of my life, my person, my accommodation, and my health.

 

I am concerned that the suggestion from the court was to place me in the hands of doctors with my having no control or say over the nature and extent of their examination. I have been complaining of poisoning, drugging and of exposure to toxic chemicals and fumes. I have displayed symptoms of such poisoning. I have produced medical records that establish symptoms consistent with such poisoning and evidence that shows that doctors covered up these symptoms. If I am poisoned, I am entitled to medical treatment for poisoning with control over this treatment.

 

I cannot be placed under the free-wheeling control of medical doctors who can be used to harm me or to cover up my symptoms or to falsely label me mentally ill which General Electric and the State are attempting to do in order to cover up their corruption.

 

The court should appreciate that having made these evidence backed complaints against powerful doctors and hospitals, I am a threat to these doctors and hospitals as well. Without court directions, which doctor will look at this evidence and arrive at conclusions that implicate Max and Apollo hospitals and these powerful doctors in attempts to murder me and establish that there is substance to my complaints against these doctors and these hospitals? No doctor will feel confident doing this without court orders as these hospitals and General Electric will ensure that the career of any doctor who supports me is destroyed.

 

The failure of the court to follow due process has created these new risks. The due process called for in such a case would involve (i) an expeditious determination that  I am a whistleblower who has exposed corruption, bribery, forgery and fraud and that there are both motives and opportunity to harm me; (ii) an expeditious determination that my medical records establish that I was drugged/ poisoned and that doctors were used to cover this up and to falsify my symptoms and to harm me; (iii) an expeditious return of my medical records and other belongings to me; (iv) immediate provision to me of both protection and suitable housing to prevent my further victimisation; (v) after making sure that my right to life is enforced and that I am not harmed and victimised further, the court should ensure that attempts are not made to sabotage the writ proceedings by appearance of authorised counsel, by filing of false, unauthorised and perjurious affidavits, by ensuring that all necessary parties are before the court, by ensuring that the State respondents file proper affidavits, etc 

 

I have more submissions that I would like to add but I am limiting this petition to the above due to time constraints on account of the coming vacations.

 

Seema Sapra

Advocate – D/1159/1995


Petitioner in Person in W.P. (C) 1280 of 2012  

Currently homeless – matter subjudice in W.P. (C) 1280 of 2012

 

 

Enclosures as mentioned in the letter

No comments:

Post a Comment