Fw: Message to Supreme Court Registrar regarding Order dated 29 January 2018 passed in Writ Petition Civil No. 1200 of 2017 by the Supreme Court

---

From: seema sapra <seemasapra@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 7:30 AM
To: II C Appeal & SLP (CM); sg.rmaithani@sci.nic.in; dyreg.meenasarin@sci.nic.in; bo.anitabhatia@sci.nic.in; Section-1B, Branch Officer; rg.dhc@nic.in; sec.ii@sci.nic.in; reg.kapilmehta@sci.nic.in; reg.deepakjain@sci.nic.in; dyreg.rakeshsharma@sci.nic.in; sci@nic.in; ib-extension@sci.nic.in; reg.ramkumarchoubey@sci.nic.in; reg.pradeepkumarsharma@sci.nic.in; reg.rajeshkumargoel@sci.nic.in; reg.sanjayparihar@sci.nic.in; Seema Sapra; Seema Sapra; Sapra Consultants
Subject: Message to Supreme Court Registrar regarding Order dated 29 January 2018 passed in Writ Petition Civil No. 1200 of 2017 by the Supreme Court

 

Dear Mr Ravindra Maithani and Mr Ramkumar Choubey, 

I request you to ensure that the order dated 29 January 2018 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Writ Petition Civil No. 1200/ 2017 is uploaded on the website of the Supreme Court. 

The order is being misreported by a legal news website, and this amounts to contempt of court but I need the order to confront them. See email below. 

Seema Sapra

General Electric Company whistle-blower 

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: seema sapra <seemasapra@hotmail.com>

Date: Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:55 PM

Subject: Email to India Legal Online - Your news item dated 29 Jan 2018 titled - SC dismisses sexual harassment plea by lawyer, says come under Art 226

To: "sho-daryaganj-dl@nic.in" <sho-daryaganj-dl@nic.in>, "sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in" <sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in>, "cp.amulyapatnaik@delhipolice.gov.in" <cp.amulyapatnaik@delhipolice.gov.in>, "Dimitrief, Alexander (GE, Corporate)" <alexander.dimitrief@ge.com>, "Suhel.Daud@ic.fbi.gov" <Suhel.Daud@ic.fbi.gov>, "cmdelhi@nic.in" <cmdelhi@nic.in>, "lggc.delhi@nic.in" <lggc.delhi@nic.in>, "ashish.sawkar@ic.fbi.gov" <ashish.sawkar@ic.fbi.gov>, "sho-safdarjung-dl@nic.in" <sho-safdarjung-dl@nic.in>, "lhelm@starbucks.com" <lhelm@starbucks.com>, "sho-amarclny-dl@nic.in" <sho-amarclny-dl@nic.in>, "sho-patelngr-dl@nic.in" <sho-patelngr-dl@nic.in>, "NDwebmail@state.gov" <NDwebmail@state.gov>, "john.flannery@ge.com" <john.flannery@ge.com>, "sho-defenceclny-dl@nic.in" <sho-defenceclny-dl@nic.in>, "dcbi@cbi.gov.in" <dcbi@cbi.gov.in>, "pmosb@nic.in" <pmosb@nic.in>, "sg.rmaithani@sci.nic.in" <sg.rmaithani@sci.nic.in>, "president@whitehouse.gov" <president@whitehouse.gov>, "sho-gk-dl@nic.in" <sho-gk-dl@nic.in>, "rg.dhc@nic.in" <rg.dhc@nic.in>, "sho-crpark-dl@nic.in" <sho-crpark-dl@nic.in>, "sho-ptstreet-dl@nic.in" <sho-ptstreet-dl@nic.in>, "EthicsAndCompliance@starbucks.com" <EthicsAndCompliance@starbucks.com>, "ny1@ic.fbi.gov" <ny1@ic.fbi.gov>, "sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in" <sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in>, "sho-saket-dl@nic.in" <sho-saket-dl@nic.in>, "sho-cp-dl@nic.in" <sho-cp-dl@nic.in>, seema gmail <seema.sapra@gmail.com>, "vishal.wanchoo@ge.com" <vishal.wanchoo@ge.com>, "sho-hauzkhas-dl@nic.in" <sho-hauzkhas-dl@nic.in>, "cp.ggn@hry.nic.in" <cp.ggn@hry.nic.in>, hschultz <hschultz@starbucks.com>, "chairmanoffice@sec.gov" <chairmanoffice@sec.gov>, "fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov" <fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov>, Sapra Consultants <sapraconsultants@gmail.com>, "mail@indialegalonline.com" <mail@indialegalonline.com>, "editor@indialegallive.com" <editor@indialegallive.com>, "reg.ramkumarchoubey@sci.nic.in" <reg.ramkumarchoubey@sci.nic.in>, "reg.sanjayparihar@sci.nic.in" <reg.sanjayparihar@sci.nic.in>, "reg.kapilmehta@sci.nic.in" <reg.kapilmehta@sci.nic.in>, "dyreg.rakeshsharma@sci.nic.in" <dyreg.rakeshsharma@sci.nic.in>, "dyreg.meenasarin@sci.nic.in" <dyreg.meenasarin@sci.nic.in>, Murali Krishnan <murali@barandbench.com>, Scba India <scbaec@gmail.com>, Dhananjay Mahapatra <dhananjay.mahapatra@gmail.com>, "aneesha.mathur@expressindia.com" <aneesha.mathur@expressindia.com>

Kindly take down this news item you have uploaded today at http://www.indialegallive.com/top-news-of-the-day/news/sc-dismisses-sexual-harassment-plea-by-lawyer-says-come-under-art-226-43076

It misrepresents proceedings and orders of the Supreme Court. 

Writ Petition Civil 1200/ 2017 was listed today before Court 4. The Bench has transferred the petition to the Delhi High Court for hearing. It has been disposed off and not dismissed. 

This writ petition is against an anonymous blog targeting me, can be read at http://seemasapra.blogspot.in/2017/12/fwd-new-writ-petition-civil-no-12002017.html and has the following prayers. A copy is attached. 

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to;-

(i) Issue a writ of Mandamus to Respondents 1, 2, 3 and 4 to ask Google, i.e., Respondents 5 and 6 to immediately remove this anonymous blog from Blogger as it violates the right to life and other fundamental rights of the petitioner-whistleblower and complainant of sexual harassment; 

(ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus to Respondents 1, 2, 3 and 4 to inquire and investigate as to who created and procured the creation of this anonymous blog titled "Seema Sapra Alert" and published at http://seemasapraalert.blogspot.in/

(iii) Issue a writ of Mandamus to Respondents 1, 2, 3 and 4 to inquire and investigate into the use of the email address seemasapraalert@gmail.comand its use to target the petitioner who is a whistleblower against General Electric Company Company and a complainant of sexual harassment against Raian Karanjawala and of sexual harassment and sexual assault against Soli J Sorabjee; 

(iv) Direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to register FIRs against the creators and procurers of this blog and the associated email ID for the crimescommitted against the petitioner listed hereinabove in the writ petition and to investigate these crimes in accordance with law and to bring criminal charges against all those involved in procuring, abetting and committing these crimes against the petitioner; 

(v) Direct the Respondents 1, 2, 3 and 4 to take legal action against the violation of the Petitioner's right to life and her other fundamental rights by the creators and procurers of this anonymous blog; 

(vi) To pass such other orders and further orders and to issue such other and further writs as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case."

If you do not removing your misleading news item, I will file a contempt of court petition against you. 

Seema Sapra 

General Electric Company whistle-blower 

Your misleading and false news item  is reproduced below. 

"SC dismisses sexual harassment plea by lawyer, says come under Art 226

January 29, 2018

The Supreme Court bench of Justices Kurian Joseph and Mohan M Shantanagoudar on Monday (January 29) dismissed an appeal by a lawyer Seema Sapra, registered with the Bar council of Delhi in which she had filed a complaint under article 32 of the Constitution against Soli Sorabjee and Karanjawala for the sexual harassment.

The court decided that the case could not be heard because there were technical inadequacies. Sapra is a whistle-blower as well as an advocate and has submitted that nude photos of the lady advocate have been uploaded on the internet which is in violation of her fundamental right under the constitution. She has also claimed that a blog has been created on the web which also defames her.

The bench asked the appellant why she had come under Article 32 and not gone under Article 226 for violation of her Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty). The appellant said that she has not been heard on merits at the high court and therefore by the landmark judgment which says that when the high court under article 226 does not listen on merits, the petitioner has right to come under Article 32, she has done so.

However, the bench was not satisfied with the arguments presented and dismissed the writ petition and no notice was issued to the respondents.

The bench also directed that the appellant has the liberty to file a writ under Article 226 (Power of High Courts to issue certain writs). The court also asked registry to pay the court fee of the appellant as she is living hand to mouth.

—India Legal Bureau"