Chest Xray dated 23 Dec 13 confirming lung poisoning of General Electric whistleblower and attorney – Seema Sapra - Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 – in the matter of Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company and Others in the Delhi High Court

Update on 27 December 2013: I continue to be poisoned even after the chest xray dated 23 December 2013. Last night I was repeatedly exposed to some toxic fumes through the night. 

The writ petition against General Electric is listed before the Delhi High Court on 7 January 2014. The intent seems to be to poison me before then. 

Also let me clarify that I did not consult a doctor at Primus Hospital on 23 December 2013. I only got an Xray taken under an assumed name. I had a conversation with a junior radiologist (Dr Vipul Bisht) in their radiology section on 23 December 2013. A recording of this conversation can be heard at this link

I am clarifying this because further attempts to poison me might be attempted to cover up the lung poisoning visible in this Xray. 

I still have to get a radiologist's report on this Xray dated 23 December 2013. I was informed by Dr Vipul Bisht that the head of radiology at Primus would be back on 27 December and that I would get the Xray report after that. 

Attached is a lung Xray that I got at Primus Hospital on 23 December 2013 under an assumed name - Mrs Rajni Singhal.

This Xray confirms that my lungs have been and continue to be poisoned.

Compare this to the attached Xray from Apollo Hospital dated January 2011. The difference shows how my lungs have been slowly destroyed over the last three years.

Seema Sapra 

Chest Xray dated 23 December 2013

Chest Xray dated January 2011

Representation to Bar Council of Delhi from General Electric whistleblower and advocate – Seema Sapra - Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 – in the matter of Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company and Others in the Delhi High Court

I have made the following representation today:

21 December 2013

To

(i)                 Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court of India

(ii)               Chief Justice Ramana, Delhi High Court 

(iii)             The Registrar General, Delhi High Court 

(iv)             Chairman, Bar Council of Delhi

(v)               All other members of Bar Council of Delhi

(vi)             Delhi Police Commissioner

To the Bar Council of Delhi, to the Chief Justice of India, to the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court, to the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court, to the Police Commissioner for Delhi, and to All Others,

Ref: Whistle-blower corruption and right to life Writ Petition pending in the Delhi High Court since February 2012 – Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 – in the matter of Seema Sapra versus General Electric Company & Others

To the President, Secretary and to all other members of the Bar Council of Delhi,

I am an advocate enrolled with the Bar Council of Delhi since 1995.

I have filed the captioned corruption petition producing complaints and evidence of corruption, fraud, forgery, bribery and other illegal practices committed by General Electric Company, its subsidiaries, its employees and agents in connection with two Railway Ministry tenders for Projects to set up diesel and electric locomotive factories at Marhowra and Madhepura respectively. These two Projects with long term purchase and service contracts are together worth over Rs 127,000 crores to the selected bidder. Not only are these Projects against the national and public interest but as described by me in the writ petition these tenders are tainted with corruption, illegal lobbying, fraud, forgery, and bribery with high level Government of India functionaries including Montek Singh Ahluwalia conspiring with General Electric to create and award these lucrative tenders to General Electric.

I worked with General Electric briefly in 2010 and discovered shortly afterwards that General Electric employees were seeking to use me as a scapegoat and use the pretext of my legal services as a device to cover up and carry out their illegal activities in connection with these Projects and tenders. I learnt that my contract with General Electric was tainted by fraud and that the contract was against public interest in that its intent was to facilitate violation of both Indian and United States law and also General Electric Company’s own internal compliance policies.

I was subjected to incessant and intense harassment during my time at General Electric as part of this conspiracy to misuse and abuse my legal services. I was even drugged during my time at General Electric with intent to prevent me from finding out what exactly was going on and from exposing corruption.

Under Indian and United States law as well as under General Electric’s compliance policies (all of which I was mandated by law as well as my employment contract to adhere to), upon learning of these corrupt and illegal activities and because of the inexplicable harassment, I first made internal complaints to General Electric compliance department and General Counsel Brackett Denniston. Attempts were made to cover up my complaints and I was drugged. My contract was abruptly and unlawfully terminated when I began to raise questions about a cover-up.

After my contract was terminated and I made clear my intention to approach legal authorities both in India and in the United States, General Electric attempted another cover-up by carrying out an alleged internal investigation. This was also used to cover-up my complaints and I continued to be drugged and poisoned.

Finally fearing for my life and with intent to protect myself, I sent my complaints to the authorities and also made my complaints public by forwarding them to lawyers, embassies, human rights organizations and to the domestic and international press. This also did not result in affording me protection.

I mentioned the complaints and the threat to my life before the Chief Justice of India in July 2011 and before the then Acting Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court in February 2012.

Finally, I filed the captioned writ petition in February 2012 seeking interalia disqualification and blacklisting of General Electric, action on my complaints in accordance with law, investigation and prosecution of the corruption complaints, and seeking protection, safe housing and enforcement of my right to life.

This writ petition and my interim applications have remained unheard since February 2012.

I have made several complaints and representations to the Bar Council of Delhi regarding this matter but I have not received any response.

The PMO, the Delhi Police, the CBI, the CVC, the Railway Ministry, General Electric Company, GE India Industrial Private Limited, GE Global Sourcing India Private Limited, Bombardier, Siemens, EMD (a US company and a subsidiary of Caterpillar), Alstom, and BHEL have all been issued notice in the captioned matter.

The Bar Council of Delhi was also issued notice in the captioned matter in April 2013 and was directed to file a report on welfare provisions for lawyers. The Bar Council of Delhi has failed to comply with the court’s directions. Not only has it not filed this report, it has even failed to enter appearance through a properly authorised counsel and no vakalatnama has been filed in the matter by the Bar Council of Delhi.

Yesterday I was distributing the attached pamphlet in the Delhi High Court and I also handed it to several Bar Council of Delhi members including to Mr Surya Prakash Khatri and to Mr Murari Tiwari. I later spoke to them both and they told me they had read the note. I asked them what the Bar Council of Delhi intended to do. To my shock instead of telling me what the Bar Council of Delhi intended to do about my complaints, Mr Murari Tiwari let out that the Bar Council of Delhi had received a complaint against me from General Electric several months ago.  I was told by Mr Murari Tiwari that the Bar Council of Delhi had not yet taken cognizance of the complaint and that they were sympathetic towards me and were trying to discourage General Electric.

It is important for me to point out that I have acted in compliance with Bar Council of India’s ethics rules for lawyers that provide that an advocate will not permit her legal services to be used to facilitate criminal acts. Under Bar Council of India ethics rules, the Indian Penal Code, and the Indian Evidence Act, I was required to make these public complaints against General Electric and to produce the evidence in my possession in support of these complaints. 

There can be no confidentiality in evidence in criminal complaints of corruption, fraud, forgery, bribery and illegal lobbying and I have merely produced this evidence (including what I witnessed and heard during my time at General Electric and some internal General Electric documents evidencing these criminal acts) on the court record in Writ Petition Civil 1280/ 2012.

Any attempt by General Electric to approach the Bar Council of Delhi and to use Bar Council of Delhi proceedings to influence and intimidate me will amount to contempt of court, interference with the administration of justice, and to criminal acts intended to influence, intimidate and silence a whistle-blower and a witness.

I attach a complaint sent by me to the Bar Council of Delhi yesterday. Mr A S Chandhiok is participating in the conspiracy and attempts to cover up my complaints, to sabotage the captioned writ petition, and to have me eliminated. My complaints against A S Chandhiok have been sent to the Delhi Police and are also on the court record.

Yesterday I was surprised that Mr Surya Prakash Khatri was discussing this matter in my absence with Mr A S Chandhiok.

I urge that no Bar Council of Delhi member participate in conspiring with General Electric, Mr A S Chandhiok or with anyone else behind my back.  

I also point out that Mr Rakesh Tiku has appeared in the captioned matter for General Electric. Ms Rana Parween Siddiqui is also very close to Mr A S Chandhiok and has helped him target me on at least two earlier occasions.

This short note is being sent due to the urgency in this matter. I will be communicating with more details in due course.

Seema Sapra

Advocate

seema.sapra@gmail.com

Complaint of poisoning and danger to life sent today by Seema Sapra, General Electric whistleblower

I have emailed the following complaint today:

To the Bar Council of Delhi, to the Chief Justice of India, to the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court, to the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court, to the Police Commissioner for Delhi and to All Others,

Writ petitioner in W.P. (Civil) 1280/ 2012 – Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company & Ors

I, the petitioner-in-person, have been sleeping in my car since 27 February 2013 without my applications for housing and protection being heard.

Corruption matter involving General Electric, Montek Ahluwalia and Rs 127,000 crores worth Railway tenders – Projects to set up Marhowra diesel loco factory and Madhepura electric loco factory

Justice A K Sikri, Justice Endlaw & Chandhiok participated in the conspiracy and attempt to murder me before this writ petition was filed, when I mentioned the threat to my life and sought protection on 17 Feb 2012 - subject of CM 428/ 2013 lying unheard

Thanks to the following judges and lawyers who have/ are facilitating this, I have been and continue to be poisoned:  A K Sikri, Gita Mittal, Shakder, P K Bhasin, Nanju Ganpathy, Zia Mody, Rajiv Nayar, A Sundaram, Najmi Waziri, Chandhiok, Rajiv Mehra, Dayan Krishnan, P K Sharma, Arvind Nigam, etc etc

I am sleeping in my car parked in rabindra ngr. Delhi High Court orders in WP Civil 1280/ 2012 direct the police to protect my life and property. The Police has failed to provide me with any security/ protection. CP Bassi must comply with the courts directions and provide me with Z+ security. The threat to my life issues from General Electric, Montek Ahluwalia and A S Chandhiok because of my whistleblower complaints in WP Civil 1280/ 2012. The threat also emanates from Soli Sorabjee and Raian Karanjawala because of complaints made by me against them for sexual harassment.

My car is parked close to the gate of D 47, residence of Spl CP Dharmendra Kumar. Delhi police officers (esp. SPL CP Dharmendra Kumar and Spl CP Alok Kumar Verma) are colluding in targeting me and having me harassed every night in rabindra ngr.

The threat also emanates from Supreme Court Judge A K Sikri, Delhi High Court Judges Gita Mittal and P K Bhasin, Analjit Singh, Max Healthcare etc who participated in past conspiracies and attempts to murder me - Complaints and evidence are on the court record

My lungs have already been destroyed and are in worse condition than those of a Bhopal gas victim.

Last night shortly before 2 am, someone sprayed a toxic pesticide/ chemical into my car which was parked outside the residence of Special Commissioner of Police Dharmendra Kumar in Rabindra Nagar. I was sleeping in the car, and woke up to the smell of this chemical/ pesticide with breathlessness. This was followed by a cough with mucus which lasted about 2 hours and kept me awake. My breathing was laboured for some time. Since this morning, I am again coughing and expelling mucus sporadically. I also have a visible lymph node swelling on the back of my neck (towards the left side) which was not present yesterday.

I apprehend that I will again be poisoned in the forthcoming court holidays.

A S Chandhiok has been party to the conspiracy and several attempts to eliminate me since 2010 when I made corruption complaints against General Electric. A US law firm – Gibson Dunn & Crutcher - has been facilitating the cover-up of my corruption complaints against General Electric and the conspiracy and attempts to eliminate me. I recently saw a document in Chandhiok’s hand which bore the name of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher. Chandhiok is helping General Electric and Gibson Dunn & Crutcher eliminate me and has dealings with this firm. Gibson Dunn & Crutcher lawyers would also face prosecution if the US government agencies investigate my complaints against General Electric and the complaint of cover-up.   

Chandhiok is also using his influence in the Delhi High Court to make it difficult for me to survive by influencing lawyers to participate in targeting me and in refusing to come to my assistance. I will be naming and producing evidence against these lawyers.

Please read my blog and the court record at seema.sapra.blogspot.in         - Seema Sapra 

General Electric whistle-blower's car vandalised

All, I am posting this here because I am unable to send an email at this moment from my Gmail account, which is also being tampered with repeatedly.

My car has been vandalized repeatedly. Today, it would not start and the mechanic discovered that one of the battery terminals had been tampered to make it loose, and the battery had also been deliberately drained.

Comment on Supreme Court order dated 11 December 2013 on DHCBA elections

Because I am not being able to send an email from my Gmail account at this time for some unknown reason, I am also posting this here:

Comment on Supreme Court order dated 11 December 2013 on DHCBA elections

Congratulations!

Thanks to Rajiv Khosla and R K Sharma who fought to uphold the democratic traditions of the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA), a three Judge Supreme Court (SC) Bench presided over by Justice Lodha has cancelled the illegal DHCBA elections that A S Chandhiok had scheduled for 13 December 2013.

The SC has directed that elections will be held according to the old unamended rules, thereby accepting that the new alleged rules drafted by A S Chandhiok without convening a General Body Meeting were illegal.

However, the direction of J. Lodha that the “ensuing” elections to be held by 28 February 2014, will follow the principle of one bar one vote is illegal, unconstitutional and wrong.

Even though the SC Bench clarified that their direction to apply the principle of one bar one vote would only be applicable to the current elections, it is important to recognise that this direction is prima facie wrong.

All lawyers have the fundamental right to associate and organize professionally. This is our fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution of India.

The Bench or the Supreme Court has no legal or moral authority to dictate to the Bar how they should organise and how the affairs of Bar Associations should be managed. The Supreme Court has no authority to dictate which lawyers can be members of a bar association and to curtail the voting rights of members of Bar Associations whether on the alleged principle of one bar one vote or on any other ground.    

The decisions in the B D Kaushik case are not the “law of the land” and do not automatically apply to all bar associations. These B D Kaushik decisions apply only to the SCBA as they were based upon a specific fact situation.

In B D Kaushik, the facts were that the SCBA had by special resolution elected to apply the principle of one bar one vote. The SC merely dismissed a legal challenge to this resolution.

The DHCBA has not passed a special resolution in General Body adopting the principle of one bar one vote.

The Supreme Court Bench headed by J. Lodha therefore had no authority to insist that the “ensuing” elections will be covered by this alleged principle.

The alleged principle of one bar one vote is against the interests of lawyers and against judicial reform. Entrenched corrupt interests within the judicial system are pushing for this alleged principle so as to curtail the power of the bar and to divide and rule.

In Sudha v President Advocates Association, Chennai reported in 2010 14 SCC 114, the Supreme Court had itself directed that alleged new rules (incorporating the one bar one vote principle) and drafted for the Chennai lawyers association by a Chennai High Court appointed committee and accepted by the Chennai High Court, could only take effect after and if they were accepted by the General Body of the Chennai lawyers association.

The alleged principle of one bar one vote must be first widely debated in the Bar and it can only be accepted if the General Body of the DHCBA elects to apply this principle by passing a special resolution.

It is crucial that lawyers protect their fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution of India to associate and organize professionally and that the direction by J. Lodha imposing the one bar one vote principle on the DHCBA be resisted and challenged in court.

It will be a mistake for the Bar to believe that this is a harmless direction in that it applies only to a single election and that thereafter the DHCBA will be free to decide whether or not to apply this alleged principle to future elections. Once the one bar one vote principle is implemented in even a single DHCBA election, it will be impossible for the DHCBA to depart from this principle in future.  

There is another problem with the SC order. It has directed that as a consequence of the alleged one bar one vote principle, any DHCBA member who has either contested or voted in the election process of any other bar association in the year 2013 will stand disqualified from either contesting or voting in the ensuing DHCBA election.

This direction amounts to a retrospective application of the alleged one bar one vote principle. For example several DHCBA members have voted in the 2013 elections of at least one district bar association. The SC order will result in the disqualification of such DHCBA members from either contesting or voting in the ensuing DHCBA elections. This disqualification from the ensuing DHCBA elections will follow even though at the time when such members participated in elections of another bar association, they could not have anticipated that this would result in disqualifying them from the ensuing DHCBA election as no such bar existed at that point in time. Such a retrospective application of a disqualification rule is unfair and unlawful.

All lawyers enrolled with the Bar Councils have the right of audience in all courts. All lawyers resident in Delhi and practicing law in Delhi have the right of audience in all Delhi courts including district courts, the High Court, the Supreme Court and before special tribunals and other quasi judicial bodies.

It is the prerogative of lawyers acting individually and collectively to decide if they want to associate with or establish a particular bar association and there can be no legal bar against a lawyer electing to be a voting member of more than one bar association.

Most litigating lawyers have court matters in more than one court and it would be reasonable to expect these lawyers to want to associate with other lawyers through bar associations based in these courts.  

If a lawyer has a right of audience before a court, he/she also has the right to associate and organise professionally with other lawyers based in that court or affiliated to it or interested in that court.

The Supreme Court decision in B D Kaushik is based upon a misconception of the purpose and role of a bar association. A bar association does not exist mainly to provide chambers, canteen and library facilities to lawyers as the B D Kaushik decision mistakenly emphasizes. (In fact, a bar association is only able to provide chambers to a tiny fraction of its members). Rather the foremost objective and purpose of a bar association is to protect the rights and interests of its members (both individual and collective).

Imagine a situation, where a lawyer practicing mainly in a district court, comes to the High Court for a single matter and that lawyer is unfairly and unlawfully victimised by the judge or any other authority connected to the Delhi High Court. Such a lawyer will require support from the DHCBA. Such as lawyer is unlikely to receive much support from the DHCBA unless he/ she is a DHCBA member.

As in the B D Kaushik decision, during the hearing on 11 December 2013, the view was verbally expressed by the SC Bench that the one bar one vote principle would only curtail voting rights and not membership rights and that therefore this principle should be acceptable to all.

This statement by the Bench is fallacious. How will a DHCBA member enforce his/ her rights if he/she does not have the right to vote either in the elections or in the General Body Meetings? Such a member with no voting rights will have no real say in the functioning of the DHCBA.

The basic tenet of democratic representation is the right to vote and elect representatives who are then expected to act in the interests of those who elected them to office. A DHCBA member who cannot vote cannot be represented by those executive committee members he/ she did not elect.

The right to vote is an indispensable component of the right to participation in the democratic functioning of an institution like the DHCBA. Right to membership of the DHCBA without a right to vote as part of the DHCBA is a mere illusory right. There can be no democratic representation without a right to vote.

Lawyers do not join bar associations merely to obtain chambers. They join bar associations expecting such associations to protect their individual rights and interests, their collective rights and interests, and the rights and interests of the bar association as institutions connected to the administration of justice.  

The alleged one bar one vote principle needs to be vigorously opposed because it is deeply detrimental to the interests of lawyers and to their Article 19 right to associate and organise professionally. Adoption of this principle will only result in the creation of insiders and outsiders among practicing lawyers.

Seema Sapra

Advocate 

On "General Electric’s Crony Capitalism" ...

"

General Electric’s Crony Capitalism

Nov. 27, 2013 

This is an adaptation of chapter 10 from Hunter Lewis’s book Crony Capitalism in America: 2008-2012.

During the presidential campaign of 2012, an online commentator observed that President Obama had not met with his Jobs Council for six months. How could this be, the commentator asked, when jobs were foremost on the president’s agenda? The answer was not hard to discover.

The Council was headed by General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt, a noted Obama political backer. Other members included Penny Pritzker, an heiress who served as Obama’s finance chairwoman in 2008, and Richard Trumpka, president of the AFL-CIO, one of the largest Obama campaign contributors. The group was established after the 2010 mid-term election losses as a device to emphasize the administration’s focus on jobs but, more importantly, to recognize political allies and campaign donors and prepare for the 2012 presidential election. This was more or less acknowledged when, after the president’s re-election, it was disbanded, despite the persistence of high unemployment.

Why had the president chosen General Electric’s Immelt in particular as the head of this campaign arm? For one reason, Immelt was sympathetic to the president’s brand of state-led capitalism. He had gone so far as to say of China in a television interview: “The one thing that actually works, state run communism, may not be your cup of tea, but their government works.”[1]

In addition, employees of General Electric as a group had been Obama’s ninth largest campaign contributor in 2008, donating $529,855. These donations in part reflected the company’s close and indeed symbiotic relationship with government in finance, defense, green energy, television, technology, and export, and its status as a primary beneficiary of the administration’s stimulus bill. It was impossible to say where the government stopped and General Electric began and vice versa.

Even more importantly, the government rescued the company from what seemed likely to be bankruptcy in 2008-2009. It also let the company off with an exceptionally mild slap-on-the-wrist fine of $50 million for cooking its books in the late 1990s and 2000s, when there might instead have been a large fine and criminal fraud charges.[2] As a further indication of its exceptionally close ties, the Obama administration inserted language into the late 2012 fiscal cliff bill that enabled the company to avoid paying much federal income taxes.[3]

How had General Electric come to be in need of a government rescue during the Crash of 2008? For most of its history, the company was considered the bluest of blue chip firms, the last company that anybody would have expected to be in need of a rescue. Prior to the Crash of 2008, it enjoyed the highest possible score from the financial rating agencies. There was a problem, however: the rating was undeserved, perhaps the result of rating agency myopia, perhaps some behind-closed-door deal.

GE Capital, the company’s finance arm, was the fastest growing part of the company. By 2007, it contributed almost 40 percent of revenues and almost half of the profits. It generated these revenues and profits by using the company’s triple A financial rating to borrow money at rates even lower than paid by banks for short periods of time and then relending for longer periods to consumers, including sub-prime borrowers. This was a classic house of cards. It should have resulted in the company’s bankruptcy. But when, in September 2008, GE ran out of credit, and the survival of the company suddenly became doubtful, Immelt knew what to do.

David Stockman, budget director under President Reagan and professional investor, described what happened:

The nation’s number one crony capitalist — Jeff Immelt of GE — jumped on the phone to [Treasury] Secretary Paulson and yelled “fire!” Soon the Fed and FDIC stopped the commercial-paper [short-term corporate debt] unwind dead in its track by essentially nationalizing the entire market. Even a cursory look at the data, however, shows that Immelt’s SOS call was a self-serving crock.

So in the fall of 2008, the US supposedly stood on the edge of an abyss, with a likely shutdown of the entire financial system, and a Depression from which we might never emerge. But this was actually just hyperbole, a way to scare President George W. Bush and members of Congress. No wonder the former said that “I’ve abandoned free market principles to save the free market system.” To say something so foolish in public in a television interview, he must have actually believed it.

Secretary Paulson is also alleged to have said, after receiving Immelt’s desperate call in September 2008, that he realized the crisis had now spread from Wall Street to Main Street. But he must have known that GE was, by that time, the very embodiment of Wall Street, despite being headquartered nearby in Connecticut. No doubt “helping Main Street” provided good cover for, among other things, saving Paulson’s Goldman Sachs.

By the time the Obama administration arrived, GE spent more money on lobbying than any other company. Immelt was asked first to join the President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board and then, as we have noted, to chair the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. When the administration’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) began enforcing new rules to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the very first exemption was granted to a GE-powered facility, the Avenal Power Center in California.[4] Meanwhile, GE built a part for General Motors’ electric car, the Chevy Volt, a favorite project of the administration that had been given hidden subsidies of as much as $250,000 per vehicle along with buyer tax credits.[5]When that proved insufficient to get the car sold, the government bought thousands of Volts for its own fleet.

It was potentially embarrassing to the administration that GE outsourced so many jobs overseas. For example, when Congress outlawed old-fashioned incandescent light bulbs, partly at GE’s urging, manufacture of the new fluorescent bulbs was moved from GE’s light bulb plants in Ohio and Kentucky to China. Also potentially embarrassing, but little known, was that the fluorescents contained mercury, an environmental hazard, and that some of the Chinese workers had reportedly been poisoned by exposure to it.[6] None of this, however, kept GE from benefiting, directly or indirectly, from what may have been billions in Stimulus Act grants.

–Hunter Lewis

Note: The views expressed in Daily Articles on Mises.org are not necessarily those of the Mises Institute.

Hunter Lewis is cofounder of Against Crony Capitalism. He is the former CEO of Cambridge Associates and the author of eight books, including two new books,Free Prices Now! and Crony Capitalism in America: 2008-2012. He has served on boards and committees of 15 not-for-profit organizations, including environmental, teaching, research, and cultural organizations, as well as the World Bank. See Hunter Lewis’s article archives.

Notes

[1] Charlie Rose CBS interview, http://www.freebeacon (December 10, 2012).

[2] Grant’s Interest Rate Observer (October 5, 2012): 1.

[3] Carney, http://www.washingtonexaminer.com (January 2, 2013).

[4] http://www.washingtonexaminer.com (February 2, 2011).

[5] http://www.againstcronycapitalism.org (February 21, 2012).

[6] Times of London: also http://www.washingtonexaminer.com (May 17, 2011).

The Ludwig von Mises Institute was founded in 1982 as the research and educational center of classical liberalism, libertarian political theory, and the Austrian School of economics. It serves as the world's leading provider of educational materials, conferences, media, and literature in support of the tradition of thought represented by Ludwig von Mises and the school of thought he enlivened and carried forward during the 20th century, which has now blossomed into a massive international movement of students, professors, professionals, and people in all walks of life. It seeks a radical shift in the intellectual climate as the foundation for a renewal of the free and prosperous commonwealth."

involvement of Judge in criminal conspiracy to eliminate General Electric whistleblower in India

This complaint below has been emailed by me to the following and several other authorities: 

To the President of India, to the Chief Justice of India, to Chief Justice Ramana of the Delhi High Court, to the Prime Minister of India, to the Registrar General of the Delhi High Court, and to the Bar council of Delhi,

I have filed W.P. (Civil) 1280/ 2012 – Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company & Ors., in the Delhi High Court which is a whistle-blower corruption case.

This matter involves corruption in Indian railway tenders worth Rs. 126,000 crores and Montek Singh Ahluwalia is involved and implicated.

This matter was listed before the Bench of Justice Gita Mittal (sitting then with  Justice Midha) on 4 February 2013 and on several dates thereafter. I attach complaints  and applications that I was compelled to file because Justice Gita Mittal was corruptly attempting to sabotage this matter, and to cover up the corruption complaints and was participating in conspiracies and attempts to eliminate me.

On 6 December 2013, a police Public Prosecutor told me in the Delhi High Court that in February 2013, Gita Mittal had told her and Neelam Katara that she wanted to send me to a “pagalkhana” (mental asylum). Gita Mittal asked the Public Prosecutor if she would help with this if Gita Mittal appointed the public prosecutor as amicus curie in this matter. The Public Prosecutor told me that she had refused to be amicus stating that she would not target another lady in this manner. This public prosecutor also told me that the same judge, i.e., Gita Mittal had closed a vigilance file about a sexual harassment complaint made by this Public Prosecutor against Justice V K Shali’s court-master.

This is a very serious issue and establishes further that Gita Mittal has committed criminal offences in her corrupt endeavors to sabotage this corruption case and to target me including participating in conspiracies and attempts to eliminate me. She abused the judicial office, falsified court orders and court proceedings, fabricated evidence, covered up evidence produced by me, and passed orders that were intended to be used to target me.

Seema Sapra

Message sent by Seema Sapra (General Electric whistleblower) to Deepak Verma (retired Supreme Court of India judge)

-----Original Message-----
From: Seema Sapra [mailto:seema.sapra@googlemail.com]
Sent: 08 December 2013 10:20
To: lggc.delhi@nic.in; rg.dhc@nic.in; cp.bsbassi@nic.in; joe.kaeser@siemens.com; dch@nic.in; secypc@nic.in; splcp-admin-dl@nic.in; splcp-intandops-dl@nic.in; splcp-antiriotcell-dl@nic.in; splcp-security-dl@nic.in; splcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in; splcp-crime-dl@nic.in; splcp-armed-dl@nic.in; splcp-operation-dl@nic.in; splcp-traffic-dl@nic.in; splcp-pl-dl@nic.in; splcp-trg-dl@nic.in; splcp-splcell-dl@nic.in; jtcp-cr-dl@nic.in; jtcp-nr-dl@nic.in; jtcp-ser-dl@nic.in; jtcp-swr-dl@nic.in; splcp-pandi-dl@nic.in; jtcp-training-dl@nic.in; jtcp-phq-dl@nic.in; jtcp-ga-dl@nic.in; jtcpt_dtp@nic.in; jtcp-crime-dl@nic.in; jtcp-splcell-dl@nic.in; jtcp-sec-dl@nic.in; jcpsec@rb.nic.in; addlcp-eow-dl@nic.in; jtcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in; jtcp-sb-dl@nic.in; addlcp-crime-dl@nic.in; addlcpt-dtp@nic.in; addlcp-caw-dl@nic.in; addlcp-security-dl@nic.in; addlcp-ptc-dl@nic.in; addlcp-lic-dl@nic.in; dcp-west-dl@nic.in; addlcp-se-dl@nic.in; dcp-southwest-dl@nic.in; dcp-crime-dl@nic.in; dcp-eow-dl@nic.in; dcp-splcell-dl@nic.in; dcp-east-dl@nic.in; dcp-northeast-dl@nic.in; dcp-central-dl@nic.in; dcp-north-dl@nic.in; dcp-northwest-dl@nic.in; dcp-south-dl@nic.in; dcp-outer-dl@nic.in; dcp-newdelhi-dl@nic.in; dcp-pcr-dl@nic.in; dcp-southeast-dl@nic.in; dcp-vigilance-dl@nic.in; dcp-igiairport-dl@nic.in; sandeep.bamzai@mailtoday.in; director.iic@nic.in; secretary.iic@nic.in; South Asia Initiative Harvard University; sorina.tira@emdiesels.com; joanne.brozovich@emdiesels.com; customs@emdiesels.com; Mahesh Batra; janpathten@yahoo.com; sho-tilakmarg-dl@nic.in; sho-tuglakrd-dl@nic.in; addl-dcp2-nd-dl@nic.in; acp-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in; So Dcp; sho-vivekvhr-dl@nic.in; office@rahulgandhi.in; Dayan Krishnan; kjhasunil@yahoo.co.in; Arvind Nigam; sho-hndin-dl@nic.in; mediaindia@worldbank.org; indiapic@worldbank.org; mohitchandmathur@hotmail.com; Amarjit Singh Chandhiok; enquiries@in.g4s.com; sona.menezes@securitas-india.com; arjun.wallia@securitas-india.com; kris.van.den.briel@securitas.in; anil.nair@securitas-india.com; contact.us@securitas-india.com; contact@securitasinc.com; delhi@eaglehunters.com; info@eaglehunters.com; gurgaon@eaglehunters.com; dan.ryan@g4s.com; grahame.gibson@g4s.com; nick.buckles@g4s.com; info@indiahabitat.org; s.hameed@nic.in; Dr. Biswajit Dhar; rajendra.pachauri@yale.edu; Dir Ihc; Habitat Library & Resource Centre; Madder, Emily; banmali.agrawala@ge.com; peter.loescher@siemens.com; cmukund@mukundcherukuri.com; duadel@duaassociates.com; ranji@duaassociates.com; rajshekhar rao; mail@aglaw.in; vikram@duaassociates.com; neeraj@duaassociates.com; sec-jus@gov.in; pk.malhotra@nic.in; ramakrishnan.r@nic.in; atulkaushik@nic.in; oo.prlsecypmo@gov.in; pulok@gov.in; jmg.vc@nic.in; r.sri_kumar@nic.in; cvc@nic.in; hm@nic.in; hshso@nic.in; complaintcell-ncw@nic.in; complaintcell-ncw@nic.in; sgnhrc@nic.in; dg-nhrc@nic.in; newhaven@ic.fbi.gov; ny1@ic.fbi.gov; usanys.wpcomp@usdoj.gov; nalin.jain@ge.com; amit.kumar@ge.com; pradeep.gupta@ge.com; sriram.nagarajan@ge.com; Wiltschek Susanne EDA WSU; helpline@eda.admin.ch; _EDA-Vertretung-New-Delhi; _EDA-VISA New-Delhi; _EDA-Etat Civil New Delhi; vertretung@ndh.rep.admin.ch; beatrice.latteier@eda.admin.ch; emb@rusembassy.in; indconru indconru; web.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk; conqry.newdelhi@fco.gov.uk; LegalisationEnquiries@fco.gov.uk; delegation-india@eeas.europa.eu; re-india.commerce@international.gc.ca; info@new-delhi.diplo.de; Ambassaden New Delhi; delamb@um.dk; emb.newdelhi@mfa.no; chinaemb_in@mfa.gov.cn; InfoDesk@ohchr.org; Press-Info@ohchr.org; civilsociety@ohchr.org; nationalinstitutions@ohchr.org; webmaster@ambafrance-in.org; info_visa_delhi@ambafrance-in.org; VA@ndh.rep.admin.ch; indne@unhcr.org; ambasciata.newdelhi@esteri.it; chinaconsul_kkt@mfa.gov.cn; chinaconsul_mum_in@mfa.gov.cn; webmaster@mfa.gov.cn; in@mofcom.gov.cn; advocatesapnachauhan@yahoo.com; sapnachauhan.chauhan192@gmail.com; dcbi@cbi.gov.in; Manpreet Lamba; mr@rb.railnet.gov.in; msrk@rb.railnet.gov.in; edpgmsrk@rb.railnet.gov.in; msrb@rb.railnet.gov.in; crb@rb.railnet.gov.in; srppscrb@rb.railnet.gov.in; osdpri@rb.railnet.gov.in; dsconf@rb.railnet.gov.in; fc@rb.railnet.gov.in; ppsfc@rb.railnet.gov.in; edfc@rb.railnet.gov.in; ml@rb.railnet.gov.in; ppsml@rb.railnet.gov.in; psml@rb.railnet.gov.in; osdml@rb.railnet.gov.in; me@rb.railnet.gov.in; ppsme@rb.railnet.gov.in; osdme@rb.railnet.gov.in; mm@rb.railnet.gov.in; ms@rb.railnet.gov.in; ppsms@rb.railnet.gov.in; dpc1@rb.railnet.gov.in; mt@rb.railnet.gov.in; srppsmt@rb.railnet.gov.in; ppsmt@rb.railnet.gov.in; dtcord@rb.railnet.gov.in; secyrb@rb.railnet.gov.in; pssecyrb@rb.railnet.gov.in; dgrhs@rb.railnet.gov.in; ppsdgrhs@rb.railnet.gov.in; dgrpf@rb.railnet.gov.in; srppsdgrpf@rb.railnet.gov.in; edcc@rb.railnet.gov.in; aml@rb.railnet.gov.in; legaladv@rb.railnet.gov.in; amm@rb.railnet.gov.in; amplg@rb.railnet.gov.in; varun.arora@azbpartners.com; r_s_chidambaram@cat.com; sunand.sharma@alstom.com; hiren.vyas@alstom.com; vandana.dhir@alstom.com; jojo.alexander@alstom.com; patrick.ledermann@alstom.com; rathin.basu@alstom.com; Dimitrief, Alexander (GE, Corporate); Eglash, Jeffrey C (GE, Corporate); Nanju Ganpathy; bradford.berenson@ge.com; brackett.denniston@ge.com; jeffrey.immelt@ge.com; john.flannery@ge.com; delhihighcourt@nic.in; pmosb@nic.in; askdoj@usdoj.gov; CHAIRMANOFFICE@SEC.GOV; help@sec.gov; fcpa.fraud@usdoj.gov; radhakrishnan.k@ge.com; tejal.singh@ge.com; Sonali Mathur; Kartik Yadav; eric.holder@usdoj.gov; preet.bharara@usdoj.gov; NDwebmail@state.gov; Denise_L._Cote@nysd.uscourts.gov; ruby_krajick@nysd.uscourts.gov; Leonard_B._Sand@nysd.uscourts.gov; gloria_rojas@nysd.uscourts.gov; william_donald@nysd.uscourts.gov; edward_friedland@nysd.uscourts.gov; richard_wilson@nysd.uscourts.gov; robert_rogers@nysd.uscourts.gov; kdonovan-maher@bermandevalerio.com; rcohen@lowey.com; ffetf@usdoj.gov; Harold_Baer@nysd.uscourts.gov; Jed_S._Rakoff@nysd.uscourts.gov; Cathy_Seibel@nysd.uscourts.gov; Victor_Marrero@nysd.uscourts.gov; fja@federaljudgesassoc.org; supremecourt@nic.in; Loretta_A._Preska@nysd.uscourts.gov; Ronald J. Keating; jtabacco@bermandevalerio.com; bhart@lowey.com; rharwood@hfesq.com; Joseph Guglielmo; drscott@scott-scott.com; ombudsperson@corporate.ge.com; Directors@corporate.ge.com; Siemens Ombudsman COM; Sunder.Venkat@aero.bombardier.com; compliance.office@bombardier.com; nilesh.pattanayak@aero.bombardier.com; pierre.beaudoin@bombardier.com; djohnson@mccarthy.ca; douglas.oberhelman@caterpilllar.com; william.ainsworth@caterpillar.com; CATshareservices@cat.com; BusinessPractices@cat.com; patrick.kron@alstom.com; keith.carr@alstom.com; Jean-David.barnea@usdoj.gov; reed.brodsky@usdoj.gov; andrew.michaelson@usdoj.gov; ellen.davis@usdoj.gov; eric.glover@usdoj.gov; paul.murphy@usdoj.gov; sandra.glover@usdoj.gov; robert.spector@usdoj.gov; christopher.connolly@usdoj.gov; joseph.cordaro@usdoj.gov; david.jones6@usdoj.gov; daniel.filor@usdoj.gov; amy.barcelo@usdoj.gov; christopher.harwood@usdoj.gov; michael.byars@usdoj.gov; benjamin.torrance@usdoj.gov; sarah.normand@usdoj.gov; elizabeth.shapiro@usdoj.gov; alicia.simmons@usdoj.gov; joyce.vance@usdoj.gov; kenyen.brown@usdoj.gov; karen.loeffler@usdoj.gov; andre.birotte@usdoj.gov; melinda.haag@usdoj.gov; laura.duffy@usdoj.gov; john.walsh@usdoj.gov; david.weiss@usdoj.gov; ronald.machen@usdoj.gov; robert.o'neill@usdoj.gov; pamela.marsh@usdoj.gov; wifredo.ferrer@usdoj.gov; michael.moore@usdoj.gov; sally yates; edward.tarver@usdoj.gov; alicia.limtiaco@usdoj.gov; florence.nakakuni@usdoj.gov; wendy.olson@usdoj.gov; james.lewis@usdoj.gov; patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov; stephen.wigginton@usdoj.gov; david.capp@usdoj.gov; joseph.hogsett@usdoj.gov; stephanie.rose@usdoj.gov; nick.klinefeldt@usdoj.gov; kerry.harvey@usdoj.gov; david.hale@usdoj.gov; stephanie.finley@usdoj.gov; rod.rosenstein@usdoj.gov; carmen.ortiz@usdoj.gov; barbara.mcquade@usdoj.gov; b.todd.jones@usdoj.gov; william.martin@usdoj.gov; richard.callahan@usdoj.gov; beth.phillips@usdoj.gov; michael.cotter@usdoj.gov; deborah.gilg@usdoj.gov; daniel.bogden@usdoj.gov; john.kacavas@usdoj.gov; paul.fishman@usdoj.gov; kenneth.gonzales@usdoj.gov; loretta.lynch@usdoj.gov; richard.hartunian@usdoj.gov; william.hochul@usdoj.gov; john.stone@usdoj.gov; anne.tompkins@usdoj.gov; tim.purdon@usdoj.gov; steve.dettelbach@usdoj.gov; carter.stewart@usdoj.gov; sandy.coats@usdoj.gov; zane.memeger@usdoj.gov; peter.smith@usdoj.gov; david.hickton@usdoj.gov; peter.neronha@usdoj.gov; bill.nettles@usdoj.gov; william.killian@usdoj.gov; jerry.martin@usdoj.gov; edward.stanton@usdoj.gov; jose.moreno@usdoj.gov; carlie.christensen@usdoj.gov; tristram.coffin@usdoj.gov; ronald.sharpe@usdoj.gov; neil.macbride@usdoj.gov; timothy.heaphy@usdoj.gov; bill.ihlenfeld@usdoj.gov; booth.goodwin@usdoj.gov; james.santelle@usdoj.gov; john.vaudreuil@usdoj.gov; christopher.crofts@usdoj.gov; bprao@bhel.in; opb@bhel.in; akhatua@bhel.in; csverma@bhel.in; vpandhi@bhel.in; Atul Saraya; ajay.sinha@emdiesels.com; singhadvocate@hotmail.com; najmiwaziri@hotmail.com; Rajeeve Mehra; mehralaw@yahoo.co.in; lajita.rajesh@alstom.com; francois.carpentier@alstom.com; armin.bruck@siemens.com; sunil.mathur@siemens.com; benoit.martel@bombardier.com; luis.ramos@bombardier.com; harsh.dhingra@bombardier.com; glen.lehman@caterpillar.com; john.newman@caterpillar.com; peter.solmssen@siemens.com; roland.busch@siemens.com; michael.suess@siemens.com; klaus.helmrich@siemens.com; daniel.desjardins@bombardier.com; james.buda@caterpillar.com; adam.smith@emdiesels.com; glen.lehman@progressrail.com; duane.cantrell@progressrail.com; craig.johnson@caterpillar.com; alert.procedure@alstom.com; harjeetsinghsachdeva@gmail.com; Zia Mody (zia.mody@azbpartners.com); Warin, F. Joseph; Chesley, John; pk65sharma@yahoo.co.in; confidential@sfo.gsi.gov.uk; public.enquiries@sfo.gsi.gov.uk; ohhdl@dalailama.com; dhir@dhirassociates.com; amit.sibal@amitsibal.com; stephen.vogt@ic.fbi.gov; luis.quesada@ic.fbi.gov; steven.kessler@ic.fbi.gov; henry.gittleman@ic.fbi.gov; renn.cannon@ic.fbi.gov; stephen.gaudin@ic.fbi.gov; eric.peterson@ic.fbi.gov; jeff.bedford@ic.fbi.gov; david.brooks@ic.fbi.gov; robert.clifford@ic.fbi.gov; mary.warren@ic.fbi.gov; bill.nicholson@ic.fbi.gov; frank.teixeira@ic.fbi.gov; richard.cavalieros@ic.fbi.gov; timothy.langan@ic.fbi.gov; sharon.kuo@ic.fbi.gov; kingman.wong@ic.fbi.gov; daniel.bodony@ic.fbi.gov; christopher.mcmurray@ic.fbi.gov; ralph.hope@ic.fbi.gov; eric.metz@ic.fbi.gov; daniel.baldwin@ic.fbi.gov; alejandro.barbeito@ic.fbi.gov; cary.gleicher@ic.fbi.gov; paul.haertel@ic.fbi.gov; greg.cox@ic.fbi.gov; lazaro.andino@ic.fbi.gov; gabriel.ramirez@ic.fbi.gov; tom.sobocinski@ic.fbi.gov; benjamin.walker@ic.fbi.gov; kirk.striebich@ic.fbi.gov; Snyder, David; gregory.cox@ic.fbi.gov; katherine.andrews@ic.fbi.gov; carolyn.willson@ic.fbi.gov; mark.nowak@ic.fbi.gov; stuart.wirtz@ic.fbi.gov; lesley.buckler@ic.fbi.gov; daniel.dudzinski@ic.fbi.gov; william.peterson@ic.fbi.gov; connally.brown@ic.fbi.gov; leo.navarette@ic.fbi.gov; lawrence.futa@ic.fbi.gov; gregory.shaffer@ic.fbi.gov; daniel.clegg@ic.fbi.gov; adishaggarwala@yahoo.com; adishaggarwala@hotmail.com; vsondhi@luthra.com; muraritiwari.adv@gmail.com; adv.priyankatyagi@gmail.com; sarlakaushik@yahoo.com; goswamiandassociates@yahoo.co.in; vedbaldev@rediffmail.com; rakeshtikuadvocate@yahoo.com; kkmanan@rediffmail.com; ars.chauhan.co@gmail.com; Usama Siddiqui; Rajiv Khosla; rakeshkochar@hotmail.com; khatri.surya@hotmail.com; puneet mittal; advamit.sharma@gmail.com; Attorneynitin@yahoo.com; Rajesh Mishra; jaibirnagar@gmail.com; bharati@chintan-india.org; info@chintan-india.org; indu@igsss.net; Subramanian Swamy; aman.aggarwal@aricent.com; jsers@mea.gov.in; rkchopra@sansad.nic.in; jsdedel@hub.nic.in; gujralrs@nic.in; praful.kumar@nic.in; rkaur@nic.in; bk.prasad@nic.in; sailesh@nic.in; pandey@ment.delhi.nic.in; asdg_mohfw@nic.in; secyexp@nic.in; kedias.mail@gmail.com; membert-dot@nic.in; secy.president@rb.nic.in; mathew.thomas@rb.nic.in; trmeena@nic.in; aradhana.johri@nic.in; Sho-lodhicolony-dl@nic.in; as@naco.gov.in; csrhw@csrhw.com.cn; cnriec@chinacnr.com; ashmita.sethi@boeing.com; raymond.l.conner@boeing.com; timothy.keating@boeing.com; dinesh.a.keskar@boeing.com; deepak@adlakha.com; deepak verma
Cc: Seema Sapra; Seema Sapra
Subject: Re: message to Justice (Retd) Deepak Verma from General Electric whistleblower - Writ Petition (Civil) 1280/ 2012 – in the matter of Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company and Others in the Delhi High Court

To Mr (Retired Judge) Deepak Verma,

I also point out that GE India and AZB & Partners/ Nanju Ganpathy have

knowingly furnished you with an incorrect address for me. I have not

lived at G-4 Jangpura Extension since 30 May 2012 and GE India and AZB

& Partners/ Nanju Ganpathy know this fact very well. This further

establishes the malafides on the part of GE India and of Nanju

Ganpathy/ AZB & Partners. Please see the attached document.

In fact as a part of the vicious campaign against me, I have been

rendered homeless. I am sleeping in my car since 27 February 2013.

Seema Sapra

On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:

> To Mr (Retired Judge) Deepak Verma,

> 

> I refer to your email sent to me on 19 November 2013 which is

> reproduced in the email below.

> 

> I immediately ask you to cease and desist from taking any steps

> including giving your consent to any alleged arbitration between me

> and GE India Industrial Private Limited.

> 

> You are being misled as to the correct facts.

> 

> I am a whistle-blower who has filed a corruption writ petition against

> GE India and against its parent company General Electric Company,

> which the Delhi High Court is seized of since February 2012.

> 

> Acting in contempt of court, GE India is trying to use the pretext of

> arbitration to cover up these corruption charges. A copy of the

> petition is enclosed. The entire court record can be downloaded from

> http://seemasapra.blogspot.in/2013/10/court-documents-in-ge-whistleblower.html

> 

> There is no subsisting arbitration clause. The disputes alleged are

> not arbitrable. This attempted arbitration is only an attempt to gag

> me and to cover up corruption, fraud, forgery, bribery, other illegal

> practices and  conspiracy and attempt to murder which are the subject

> matter of Writ Petition Civil 1280/ 2012.

> 

> Your attempting to act in this matter will amount to contempt of

> court, interference with the administration of justice, and

> interference/ intimidation and unlawful influence on a whistleblower

> and a witness.

> 

> Your impartiality is also in serious  doubt because of the suspicious

> timing of your email sent to me. I am also concerned that you have not

> replied to my email sent to you on 21 November 2013.

> 

> I ask you again to cease and desist from your illegal acts.

> 

> Also attached are copies of some applications pending hearing in this

> writ petition and of some other relevant documents. I also point out

> that I have been compelled to point out how more than one judge of the

> Delhi High Court has corruptly attempted to cover up these complaints

> and to target me, Judges like Gita Mittal have falsified court orders

> and records of court proceedings. Therefore a mere perusal of court

> orders in this matter is misleading unless the complete court record

> is studied.

> 

> AZB & Partners/ Nanju Ganpathy have no legal authority to act on

> behalf of GE India in this matter. This issue is also subjudice in the

> Delhi High Court.

> 

> Seema Sapra

> 

> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:

>> All,

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> Last night I stayed in the India International Center (IIC) as a guest

>> of IIC member and ASG Mr A S Chandhiok.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> I am again staying at the IIC tonight.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> I have been poisoned in other places that I have stayed at over the

>> last 3 years, including at the India Habitat Center, at Ambassador

>> hotel and most recently at Ginger hotel- Vivek Vihar in June 2013. Not

>> only did the police facilitate such poisoning but also participated in

>> the attempted cover-up afterwards.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> Delhi police officials are involved in targeting me and in past

>> attempts to murder me.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> I want Z+ security.  There is an enhanced  threat to my life at this

>> time from General Electric,  and from Montek Singh Ahluwalia  because

>> of my whistleblower complaints in WP Civil 1280/ 2012 pending in the

>> Delhi High Court. The threat also emanates from Soli Sorabjee and

>> Raian Karanjawala.  I repeat that Delhi police officers are colluding

>> in targeting me.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> I also attach a document served on me by AZB & Partners on 19 November 2013.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> I will be responding to this document as well as to the following

>> email received by me on 19 November 2013.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> “From: deepak verma [mailto:justicedverma@gmail.com]

>> Sent: 19 November 2013 13:40

>> To: seema.sapra@googlemail.com

>> Cc: nanju.ganpathy@azppartners.com

>> Subject:

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> 19-11-2013,

>> 

>> Dear Sir/Madam,

>> 

>> SUB: ARBITRATION MATTER BETWEEN G.E. INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT. LTD. VS.

>> MS. SEEMA SAPRA BEFORE THE SOLE ARBITRATOR, JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMA,

>> RETD. JUDGE, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> REF:    My letter dated 16-11-2013.

>> 

>>                            I have been appointed as a Sole Arbitrator

>> in the aforesaid matter to resolve the disputes between the parties.

>> In this regard, I have already sent my consent to act as such.

>> 

>>                            I now hereby give you Notice to appear

>> before me on 08-12-2013 Sunday at 11:30 AM at my residence for

>> Preliminary Hearing.

>> 

>>                           Please make it convenient to appear on the

>> aforesaid date at my residence so that Procedural Order could be

>> passed in your presence.

>> 

>>                            For appearance of Parties or their

>> Advocates on DECEMBER, 08’ 2013, SUNDAY AT 11:30 AM, AT MY RESIDENCE,

>> i.e. B-4, Geetanjali Enclave, (G.F.) Main Shivalik Road, New Delhi –

>> 110017.

>> 

>> 

>>                   Sole Arbitrator,

>> 

>> 19-11-2013

>>     Justice Deepak Verma

>> 

>> New Delhi

>>                     (Former Judge)

>> 

>> 

>>                      Supreme Court Of India

>> 

>> To,

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> Ms. Seema Sapra,

>> 

>> G-4, FF,

>> 

>> Jangpura Extension

>> 

>> New Delhi – 110014

>> 

>> Seema.sapra@googlemail.com

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> Mr. N. Ganpathy,

>>                  M/S G.E.India Industrial Private Ltd.

>> 

>> For A.Z.B & Partners

>>    401,402, 4th Floor

>> 

>> Advocates & Solicitors

>>     Aggarwal Millennium Tower,

>> 

>> Plot No. A-8, Sector – 4

>>     E-1,2,3 Netaji Subhash Palace

>> 

>> Noida – 201301 [U.P]

>>    Wazirpur, Delhi.

>> 

>> Nanju.ganpathy@azbpartners.com”

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> I have made complaints of corruption, fraud, forgery, bribery and

>> other criminal offences against General Electric Company and its

>> Indian subsidiaries and against several GE management level staff, GE

>> lawyers and agents.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> These complaints are subjudice before the Delhi High Court in W.P.

>> Civil 1280/ 2012. These complaints are not arbitrable.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> Any attempt to initiate arbitration in this matter or any order passed

>> by Justice Deepak Verma in this matter will inter alia amount to

>> contempt of court, interference with and obstruction of the

>> administration of justice, influencing and intimidation of a protected

>> witness, and inteference with a whistleblower corruption petition

>> pending with the Delhi High Court.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> I will be sending a detailed reply to the letter from AZB and to the

>> email received by me on 19 November 2013 setting forth in detail why

>> this arbitration cannot be intiated and cannot be proceeded with and

>> elaborating on why Justice Deepak Verma must not give his consent for

>> any arbitration.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> Seema Sapra

flyer circulated today to several hundreds of lawyers in the Delhi High Court by Seema Sapra, General Electric whistle-blower

"W.P. (Civil) 1280/ 2012 – Seema Sapra v. General Electric Company & Ors, - a whistleblower corruption case

Thanks to the following judges and lawyers who have/ are facilitating this, I have been and continue to be poisoned:


A K Sikri, Gita Mittal, Shakder, P K Bhasin, Nanju Ganpathy, Zia Mody, Rajiv Nayar, A Sundaram, Najmi Waziri, Chandhiok, Rajiv Mehra, Dayan Krishnan, P K Sharma, Arvind Nigam, etc etc

For example my lungs have been totally destroyed and there is likely other organ damage as well"

Attempt to expose me to pesticides inside the rest-room in Ambience Mall in Gurgaon

I am posting this here because for some unknown reason I am not able to send emails at this time. 

Video added on youtube: 

watch at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQ17_y8T-k8

All, 

I am in Ambience Mall in Gurgaon. I went to the ladies rest-room near the reliance store on the first floor. 

About 10 minutes later, I heard a loud knock on the main door and the female attendant went out and I could hear male voices talking loudly. 

Then the woman attendant returned and knocked on the door of the stall I was in. I asked her what she wanted and she said I was taking too long. i replied that as far as I knew there was no time limit on how long one could take.  

I finished and came out and was combing my hair. Then there was another knock on the rest-room door. The woman attendant opened it. I also went to the door to see who it was. A man was standing there with a pesticide cylinder and sprayer. He intended to spray pesticides in the rest-room when I was inside. 

I immediately objected and recorded videos and took photographs which will be emailed to the Police. 

The male attendant in the adjacent men's rest-room was laughing at me. I recorded him and he tried to hide his face. He then summoned some other men. One of them attempted to threaten me by telling me that I could not record on the premises. 

I told him I was going to make a police report. 

The men including the man with the pesticide container then followed me to the second floor where I went inside the Barista cafe. The men continued to stand outside, they summoned more security guards including a man in a pink shirt,. 

These men dispersed immediately after i sent my email complaint below to the Police at 11.36 am. CCTV recordings can be used to identify these men. 

The pictures and videos will be emailed to the Police. . 

An FIR needs to be registered as this was a clear conspiracy and attempt to poison my lungs while I was inside the rest-room. 

Seema sapra

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Seema Sapra <seema.sapra@googlemail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I am in Ambience Mall in Gurgaon. I was in the toilet a short while
> ago, when a man was sent to the toilet with a pesticide container. He
> intended to spray the toilet while I was inside. I have videos of this
> which I will be emailing shortly.
>
> Seema Sapra